[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Tucker Carlson:11/7/2024 "now that Trump is president, i can tell you everything" Fear-Stricken Pharma Big-Wigs Convene Emergency Teleconference to Thwart RFK Jr. Judge strikes down Joe Biden administration program aimed at easing citizenship pathway for some undocumented immigrants CNN faces another defamation lawsuit after appeals court sides with Project Veritas These Hollywood Celebrities Swore They'd Leave America If Trump Won All Talk, No Walk Blaze News original: Border Patrol whistleblower's career on the line after spotlighting trafficking horrors Dems open can of worms by asking about millions of 2020 Biden voters who somehow disappeared in 2024 Deadline: US says Israel failing in aid efforts. What happens now? Kash Patel, Rumored Pick for CIA Chief, Announces Massive Declassification Will Occur Hezbollah unveils ‘Fateh 110’ ballistic missile in targeting Israeli sites Pentagon running low on air-defense missiles as Israel, Ukraine gobble up remaining supplies An Open Letter To Elon Musk Is this why Trump was allowed to win? This Is The Median Home Price In Each US State Alex Soros Shocked That the Incumbent Political Order Is Being Crushed Around The Globe Beverly Hills Lawyer Disbarred Two Years After Admitting He Paid a Ringer to Take the Bar Lumumba: 'I am not guilty, and so I will not proceed as a guilty man.' Lauren Boebert Wins House Election After Switching to More Conservative Colorado District AIPAC Boasts of Influence Over Congress, Ousting 'Eleven Anti-Israel Candidates' Police Searching for 40 Escaped Monkeys After Mass Breakout from South Carolina Research Facility "You Don't Deserve Any Respect!": Steve Bannon Goes Scorched Earth On Democrats On Election Night Livestream Putin's ready to talk now that the mentally ill homosexuals have been brushed aside Trump, the Economy & World War III: Col. Douglas Macgregor Ex-Top Official Catherine Austin Fitts: Inside Trump’s Victory, RFK Jr., and the Deep State 10 Big Losers That Weren't On The Ballot Elon’s first day working for the Federal Government Senior Harris Advisor Deletes X Account As "Massive Scandal" Brews Over $20 Million In Campaign Debt Biden addresses the nation after Trump's election victory Top Foods & Lifestyle Habits To Make New Mitochondria For Longevity | Dr. William L Putin Shocks Israel Envoy In Kremlin With Pro-Palestine Speech | This Happened Next

9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: What became of War?
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Apr 20, 2009
Author: me
Post Date: 2009-04-20 21:38:39 by Critter
Keywords: None
Views: 2966
Comments: 167

Ain't seen that shilly dimwit for a bit. Did he get canned for inferior shilliness?

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

He's going to wear his tongue out. He got lots of wounds here. hehehe

You actually found that witty?

Oui!!

litus  posted on  2009-04-21   10:03:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

He didn't have a whole lot to say about those 660+ engineers and architects who question the 9/11 report. In fact, since it directly and absolutely proved his assertions wrong, it appears he put his tail between his legs and ran off.

No, he hasn't, has he?!

litus  posted on  2009-04-21   10:03:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Why would I overweight what less than 1% of the total of their combined fields have to say versus underweighting the OVERWHELMING majority... Gee 600 out of 100K...

war  posted on  2009-04-21   10:39:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Why would I .........

You're back?

We heard that .gov might have transferred you to Tibet or Mongolia.

Are you on probation?

TwentyTwelve  posted on  2009-04-21   10:46:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

You're back?

No.

We heard that .gov might have transferred you to Tibet or Mongolia.

How many of "you" make a "we"?

Are you on probation?

Never been convicted...

war  posted on  2009-04-21   10:51:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Why would I overweight what less than 1% of the total of their combined fields have to say versus underweighting the OVERWHELMING majority... Gee 600 out of 100K...

Got some firm numbers on that shillster, or are you just pulling that 100K figure out of your ass as usual?

Post some proof that there are 100K engineers and architects who approve of the 9/11 Commission's findings.

I won't hold my breath.

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-04-21   11:54:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

9. To: mininggold (#7)

Quick question...why do you seem so sane here and not so much there...?

For some reason, btw, I am getting blocked from that website here at work and our filter is not that strong...

war posted on 2009-04-17 13:37:10 ET

69.55.11.240/cgi-bin/read...i? ArtNum=261782&Disp=9#C9

Hey war, I thought you said you couldn't access this site, you were getting blocked???

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-04-21   12:31:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

(war) Post some proof that there are 100K engineers and architects who approve of the 9/11 Commission's findings.

Support your claim war.

TwentyTwelve  posted on  2009-04-21   12:46:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Oui!!

After you read your first non-picture book you may feel differently...

war  posted on  2009-04-21   13:15:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Post some proof that there are 100K engineers and architects who approve of the 9/11 Commission's findings.

How many enginners are there?

war  posted on  2009-04-21   13:20:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Post some proof that there are 100K engineers and architects who approve of the 9/11 Commission's findings.

How many enginners are there?

Proof that there are 100K engineers and architects who approve of the 9/11 Commission's findings.

TwentyTwelve  posted on  2009-04-21   13:22:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

The proof is on this thread, moron. There aren't even 600 of them who object to it...

Math is an issue with you?

war  posted on  2009-04-21   13:26:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Math is an issue with you?

Spelling is an issue with you?

TwentyTwelve  posted on  2009-04-21   13:45:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Spelling is an issue with you?

I'll take that for an "obviously Math is an issue"....

war  posted on  2009-04-21   13:52:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

tcm.bloodhorse.com/derby_dozen. asp

Check out the encouraging comments on your colt.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2009-04-21   14:30:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

WIN WILLY!!!!

Shame what happened to Old Fashioned, eh?

war  posted on  2009-04-21   14:54:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Yeah, 40 bucks down the drain on one of my Future Wager tickets.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2009-04-21   15:16:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Any further word on that colt?

war  posted on  2009-04-21   15:29:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

He'll heal and live a long and happy life, but he won't race again. I think he'll become a sire/stud in his next life. I envy him.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2009-04-21   15:32:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Retirement announced for Old Fashioned

Rick Porter, owner of former leading three- year-old Old Fashioned, announced on Tuesday that the colt has been retired.

Old Fashioned underwent surgery Tuesday morning to repair a fractured knee the horse suffered during the running of the $1 million Arkansas Derby at Oaklawn Park last Saturday.

"The surgery went very well this (Tuesday) morning," Porter said in a statement. "Dr. (Larry) Bramlage told me that it would be almost impossible for him to return to anywhere near his level as a racehorse. After my discussion with Dr Bramlage, I decided to retire him. I am not sure if I will stand him myself in Kentucky next year or possibly Florida."

Old Fashioned began 2009 atop the list of Kentucky Derby contenders and solidified his ranking by winning the Southwest Stakes at Oaklawn Park.

However, he lost the Rebel Stakes to Win Willy after having the lead at the top of the stretch. The loss to Papa Clem in the Arkansas Derby came after the favorite set the pace to the stretch in the 1 1/8 mile race.

Larry Jones trained the three-year-old to a career mark of four wins in six starts for $583,280, Jones also conditions Kentucky Derby contender Friesan Fire who is the Louisiana Derby champ.

www.miamiherald.com/sport...racing/story/1000711.html

I'm keeping an eye on Friesan Fire lately.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2009-04-21   15:36:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

That would bother me if not for the fact tnat ANY normal work day makes you shudder...

Every normal work day for me is a wonder, and inspiration and always a lesson in human nature.

Join 2x4 Tuesdays & protect your RKBA.
www.righttokeepandbeararms.com

randge  posted on  2009-04-21   17:13:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

How many enginners are there?

Doesn't matter. What DOES matter is the number of them that have spoken out on the topic and what they have said. There are over 660 that don't believe the 9/11 Commission findings, and feel that there needs to be a full investigation into the events that occured that day.

Many if not most of those engineers (and architects) don't believe that the towers fell as claimed by the official story, and feel that they were brought down by controlled demolition.

Now, find a valid report that lists the number of engineers and architects that DO approve of the 9/11 Commission findings. I don't want you to guess or make up a number, I want an official list of those that agree.

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-04-21   21:28:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I'll take that for an "obviously spelling is an issue"....

TwentyTwelve  posted on  2009-04-21   21:32:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

The proof is on this thread, moron. There aren't even 600 of them who object to it...

Proof? What, your question as to how many engineers are there in the world is supposed to be PROOF? You don't have ANY proof of how many approve of the 9/11 Commission findings, you just made up a number and tried to say there is that many because there MIGHT be that many in the world, and since they haven't publically made a statement concerning their thoughts, well then by gosh they must agree with the official story. What a dishonest cretin you are.

As far as your comment that there aren't even 600 who object to the 9/11 Commission findings, you are a liar, as the proof of that has been posted to you at least twice here on 4um.

Here it is again so that you can't say it wasn't posted, AGAIN.

660+ Engineers and Architects Question the 9/11 Commission Report

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-04-21   21:36:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I'll take that for an "obviously spelling is an issue"....

Hell, war can't even spell "engineer" never mind count how many there are that approve of the 9/11 Commission findings...

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-04-21   21:37:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

As far as your comment that there aren't even 600 who object to the 9/11 Commission findings, you are a liar, as the proof of that has been posted to you at least twice here on 4um.

Here it is again so that you can't say it wasn't posted, AGAIN.

that makes three times; I saw the other two times you posted them to war (not including the different link I also posted to war concerning another architects and engineers group).

litus  posted on  2009-04-21   21:38:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

that makes three times; I saw the other two times you posted them to war (not including the different link I also posted to war concerning another architects and engineers group).

It's like someone going around telling people that there aren't really 12 eggs in a dozen, even after being shown countless times how many there are in a box.

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-04-21   21:43:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

It's like someone going around telling people that there aren't really 12 eggs in a dozen, even after being shown countless times how many there are in a box.

It goes way beyond a denial problem.

litus  posted on  2009-04-21   21:44:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Here it is again so that you can't say it wasn't posted, AGAIN.

660+ Engineers and Architects Question the 9/11 Commission Report

War just keeps ignoring this!

TwentyTwelve  posted on  2009-04-21   21:45:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Here it is again so that you can't say it wasn't posted, AGAIN.

660+ Engineers and Architects Question the 9/11 Commission Report

War just keeps ignoring this!

why would that be do you suppose??

litus  posted on  2009-04-21   21:48:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

It's like someone going around telling people that there aren't really 12 eggs in a dozen, even after being shown countless times how many there are in a box.

It goes way beyond a denial problem.

hmmm...

"Way beyond denial" is a strong indication of possible mental damage and/or severe psychological disorders.

TwentyTwelve  posted on  2009-04-21   21:51:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

"Way beyond denial" is a strong indication of possible mental damage and/or severe psychological disorders.

I agree. Maybe he's smokin' sumpin.

litus  posted on  2009-04-21   21:51:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

"What we are faced with is a lie of such proportions that even to suggest it makes one subject to ridicule and scorn. Who could have done such a terrible thing? Certainly not our government or military. Rogue elements in the intelligence agencies? I have no idea.

But I do know that the official explanation doesn't hold water. An open, honest re-opening of the case is in order. A near majority of Americans agrees with this view. Let us keep pressing for an honest investigation."

- David A. Johnson

Just off the top of the list: 660+ Engineers and Architects Question the 9/11 Commission Report

Richard Gage, AIA, Architect – Member, American Institute of Architects. A practicing Architect for 20 years who has worked on most types of building construction including numerous fire-proofed steel-framed buildings. Founding member of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. Speech at Sonoma State University 4/20/07:

"Another 2006 poll by Scripps Howard, Ohio University, which found that a shocking 16% believe that the World Trade Center's Twin Towers were brought down by explosives. Unfortunately, my research has also concluded that this is true. Tonight I will present to you the very clear evidence that all three World Trade Center high-rise buildings, the Twin Towers and Building 7 were destroyed not by fire as our government has told us, but by controlled demolition with explosives." http://ae911truth.org/aboutus.php

David A. Johnson, B.Arch, MCP (City Planning), PhD (Regional Planning), F.AICP – Internationally recognized architect and city and regional planner. Professor Emeritus, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Tennessee. Former Professor and Chair of the Planning Departments at Syracuse University and Ball State University. Elected Fellow, American Institute of Certified Planners (2004). Past President of the Fulbright Association of the United States. Recipient of five Fulbright Scholarships for continued education in Cyprus, India, Thailand, and the Soviet Union. Directed educational projects in Brazil and Portugal. Active in reconstruction efforts in Bosnia and bicommunal peace-making in Cyprus. Former professional planner on the staffs of the Washington National Capital Planning Commission and the Regional Plan Association of New York. Former editorial board member of the Journal of the American Planning Association. Author of numerous journal articles on urban and regional planning theory and history. Author of Planning the Great Metropolis (1996). Co-author of The TVA Regional Planning and Development Program (2005). Contributing author to Two Centuries of American Planning (1988). Statement in support of Architects and Engineers petition:

"I was dubious of the official explanations from the outset. You see, as a professional city planner in New York, I knew those buildings and their design. I attended and participated in the hearings at the New York City Hall when the buildings were first proposed. I argued for the buildings on the basis that the interior core represented a way of internalizing the cost of mass transit, which in our system is almost impossible to finance through public bond issues.

So I was well aware of the strength of the core with its steel columns, surrounding the elevators, and stairwells. I should also mention that with a degree in architecture and instruction in steel design (my Yale professor had worked on the Empire State Building) I was and am no novice in structural design.

When I saw the rapid collapse of the towers, I knew that they could not come down the way they did without explosives and the severing of core columns at the base. The spewing of debris from the towers where the planes entered also could not have occurred simply with just a structural collapse. Something else was happening to make this occur.

Moreover, the symmetrical collapse is strong evidence of a controlled demolition. A building falling from asymmetrical structural failure would not collapse so neatly, nor so rapidly, as you have pointed out.

What we are faced with is a lie of such proportions that even to suggest it makes one subject to ridicule and scorn. Who could have done such a terrible thing? Certainly not our government or military. Rogue elements in the intelligence agencies? I have no idea.

But I do know that the official explanation doesn't hold water. An open, honest re-opening of the case is in order. A near majority of Americans agrees with this view. Let us keep pressing for an honest investigation." http://www.ae911truth.org

H. Theodore Elden, Jr., B.Arch, AIA – Practicing licensed architect in West Virginia for over 25 years. Now retired. Graduate of Carnegie Mellon University. Member, American Institute of Architects, West Virginia Chapter. Appointed Member of West Virginia State Board of Architects. Former Member, National Council of Architectural Registration Boards (NCARB), and Member, National Committee, Intern Development Program for Architects (IDP). Professional photographer. Letter to American Institute of Architects 11/26/06:

"The primary duty of registered professionals is to protect the public safety. Professionals' intelligence, knowledge and experience provide a delicate connection between science and fact. ...

9-11 was a tragic event for our country, quickly “solved” by our government and propagated by our media, leading our country into fear, anguish, anger, war and unrestrained spending.

Have we, as building professionals, been hoodwinked? Who should better understand the collapse of the World Trade Towers than those in our profession, possibly with the consultation of demolition experts?

As I and millions have reviewed the events of that day, it seems much of the cover story is not true and impossible. As the nation is confused on the reality of that day, have we been making bad decisions ever since?

My web site collects salient information that isolates the demise of the World Trade Towers – linking many experienced, dedicated and articulate technical analysis that show clearly that the World Trade Towers were destroyed by internal explosives and not "fires from the airlines". ...

After hundreds of hours of research, and thousands of dollars purchasing materials and information, this letter outlines my most salient, articulate examples of things that architects should investigate. If I err slightly in any single item, that does not discount this letter. On the contrary, even if only part of these accusations are true, they should be investigated." http://www.abodia.com/911

Join 2x4 Tuesdays & protect your RKBA.
www.righttokeepandbeararms.com

randge  posted on  2009-04-21   21:58:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Just off the top of the list: 660+ Engineers and Architects Question the 9/11 Commission Report

That website has an incredible list of highly distinguished experts and professionals who people like war are trying to belittle and silence.

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-04-21   22:04:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Former Lurker is on bozo...is he still trying to post to me?

As far as your comment that there aren't even 600 who object to the 9/11 Commission findings, you are a liar, as the proof of that has been posted to you at least twice here on 4um.

Tell your fellow Moonie here that the comment referred to "engineers" and not "engineers and architects".

war  posted on  2009-04-22   9:55:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

There are 125K enginners in the professional organization that assisted both FEMA and NIST in the 9/11 report. Furtermore, that same organization, used the 9/11 report to formulate standards that would try to immunize buildings from the type of damage and catastrophe that occurred on 9/11.

Based upon the silliness that I have seen out of you Moonbats, I really do not expect you to see how stupid it is to point to barely 600 out of 125THOUSAND...

war  posted on  2009-04-22   10:00:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Thanks...

war  posted on  2009-04-22   10:04:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I'll take that for an "obviously spelling is an issue"....

Fine...I can't spell and you can't understand how not even 600 out of 125THOUSAND is nothing...

Agreed?

war  posted on  2009-04-22   10:05:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Tell your fellow Moonie here that the comment referred to "engineers" and not "engineers and architects".

War, that's not what I recall. You used engineers, architects, police, firemen...in your demand to produce even one group...

You were provided two groups of engineers and architects (one by me, whereupon you then made additional demands of that group), and the reposting now 3 times by FormerLurker....

litus  posted on  2009-04-22   10:24:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

You used engineers, architects, police, firemen...in your demand to produce even one group...

Apples and oranges Moonbat...there is not ONE professional organization that existed prior to 9/11 that has proclaimed the attack anything other than what it was.

Moonbats congregating thereafter most certainly does not qualify.

war  posted on  2009-04-22   10:43:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Comments (71 - 167) not displayed.

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]