[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Tucker Carlson:11/7/2024 "now that Trump is president, i can tell you everything" Fear-Stricken Pharma Big-Wigs Convene Emergency Teleconference to Thwart RFK Jr. Judge strikes down Joe Biden administration program aimed at easing citizenship pathway for some undocumented immigrants CNN faces another defamation lawsuit after appeals court sides with Project Veritas These Hollywood Celebrities Swore They'd Leave America If Trump Won All Talk, No Walk Blaze News original: Border Patrol whistleblower's career on the line after spotlighting trafficking horrors Dems open can of worms by asking about millions of 2020 Biden voters who somehow disappeared in 2024 Deadline: US says Israel failing in aid efforts. What happens now? Kash Patel, Rumored Pick for CIA Chief, Announces Massive Declassification Will Occur Hezbollah unveils ‘Fateh 110’ ballistic missile in targeting Israeli sites Pentagon running low on air-defense missiles as Israel, Ukraine gobble up remaining supplies An Open Letter To Elon Musk Is this why Trump was allowed to win? This Is The Median Home Price In Each US State Alex Soros Shocked That the Incumbent Political Order Is Being Crushed Around The Globe Beverly Hills Lawyer Disbarred Two Years After Admitting He Paid a Ringer to Take the Bar Lumumba: 'I am not guilty, and so I will not proceed as a guilty man.' Lauren Boebert Wins House Election After Switching to More Conservative Colorado District AIPAC Boasts of Influence Over Congress, Ousting 'Eleven Anti-Israel Candidates' Police Searching for 40 Escaped Monkeys After Mass Breakout from South Carolina Research Facility "You Don't Deserve Any Respect!": Steve Bannon Goes Scorched Earth On Democrats On Election Night Livestream Putin's ready to talk now that the mentally ill homosexuals have been brushed aside Trump, the Economy & World War III: Col. Douglas Macgregor Ex-Top Official Catherine Austin Fitts: Inside Trump’s Victory, RFK Jr., and the Deep State 10 Big Losers That Weren't On The Ballot Elon’s first day working for the Federal Government Senior Harris Advisor Deletes X Account As "Massive Scandal" Brews Over $20 Million In Campaign Debt Biden addresses the nation after Trump's election victory Top Foods & Lifestyle Habits To Make New Mitochondria For Longevity | Dr. William L Putin Shocks Israel Envoy In Kremlin With Pro-Palestine Speech | This Happened Next

9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: What became of War?
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Apr 20, 2009
Author: me
Post Date: 2009-04-20 21:38:39 by Critter
Keywords: None
Views: 2962
Comments: 167

Ain't seen that shilly dimwit for a bit. Did he get canned for inferior shilliness?

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

organization that assisted in the 9/11 reports

you mean the joke commission report?

That COMMISSION?

The 9/11 Commission Report: A 571-Page Lie

911Truth.org ::::: The 9/11 Truth Movement

... www.911truth.org, so long as the full source URL (">http://www.911truth. org/article.php?story=20050523112738404 in this case) is posted with the article. ... www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20050523112738404 - 47k - Jan 23, 2007 - Cached -

TwentyTwelve  posted on  2009-04-22   11:22:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

war still believes the .gov Commission Report?

ROTFLMAO

hehehehe!

litus  posted on  2009-04-22   11:22:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Nothing happened to WAR, it goes on forever

Itistoolate  posted on  2009-04-22   11:22:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

organization that assisted in the 9/11 reports

you mean the joke commission report?

That COMMISSION?

The 9/11 Commission: A Play on Nothing in Three Acts

911Truth.o rg ::::: The 9/11 Truth Movement

ACTIVISM RESOURCES. What's happening in US Legislature? Text of bills, roll call votes, full information at www.thomas.gov ... www.911truth.org/article.php?story=2006090610003242 - 38k - Cached -

TwentyTwelve  posted on  2009-04-22   11:22:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

organization that assisted in the 9/11 reports

you mean the joke commission report?

That COMMISSION?

The following Veteran National Security experts were turned away, ignored, or censored by the 9/11 Commission, even though they had direct and relevant information related to the Commission’s investigation:

John M. Cole, Former Veteran Intelligence Operations Specialist; FBI - Mr. Cole worked for 18 years in the FBI’s Counterintelligence Division as an Intelligence Operations specialist, and was in charge of FBI’s foreign intelligence investigations covering India, Pakistan and Afghanistan. Mr. Cole had knowledge of certain activities that directly related to the terror attacks on September 11, 2001. He notified the 9/11 Commission during its investigation, but never received a response. His name and contact information was provided to the Commission as a key witness by other witnesses, but he was never contacted or interviewed.

John Vincent, Retired Special Agent, Counterterrorism; FBI - Mr. Vincent worked for the FBI for 27 1/2 years before retiring in 2002. He worked his last 8 years in counterterrorism in the FBI’s Chicago Field Office. Mr. Vincent, along with Robert Wright, exposed inefficiencies within the FBI in working counterterrorism cases, and certain warnings they had tried to pursue prior to the 9/11 attack that were directly related to Al-Qaeda’s financial network and money laundering activities. Although he was granted an interview, the commissioners’ investigators refused to let him provide them with information related to his case and the 9/11 terrorists network; they insisted on limiting the interview to only administrative and irrelevant questions and issues.

Robert Wright, Veteran Special Agent, Counterterrorism; FBI - Mr. Wright is a veteran special agent in the FBI Chicago Field Office Counterterrorism Unit. He had been investigating a suspected terrorist cell for three years, when he was informed in January 2001 that the case was being closed. Agent Wright, along with Mr. Vincent, exposed inefficiencies within the FBI in working counterterrorism cases and certain warnings they’d tried to pursue prior to the 9/11 attack that were directly related to Al-Qaeda’s financial network and money laundering activities. Three months before September 11, Wright wrote a stinging internal memo charging that the FBI was not interested in thwarting a terrorist attack, but rather "was merely gathering intelligence so they would know who to arrest when a terrorist attack occurred." The FBI refused to allow Wright to testify before the 9/11 Commission, however, the Commission did not insist or attempt to subpoena Wright; despite the fact that it had subpoena power.

Sibel Edmonds, Former Language Specialist; FBI - Ms. Edmonds worked for the FBI’s Washington Field Office as a language specialist with Top Secret Clearance performing translations for counterterrorism and counterintelligence operations dealing with Turkey, Iran, and Turkic speaking Central Asian countries. She contacted the 9/11 Commission in May 2003 and requested a meeting to provide them with information directly related to the terrorist attack. The Commission investigators refused to meet with Edmonds and informed her that due to their limited resources and time they were not going to interview all witnesses. She was able to provide the commission with information and documents only after certain 9/11 family members intervened directly. Ms. Edmonds’ testimony was completely censored by the Commission.

Behrooz Sarshar, Former Language Specialist; FBI - Mr. Sarshar worked for the FBI’s Washington Field Office as a language specialist with Top Secret Clearance performing Farsi translations for counterterrorism and counterintelligence operations dealing with Iran and Afghanistan. He had first-hand information of prior specific warning obtained from a reliable informant in April 2001 on the terrorist attacks of September 11. Mr. Sarshar contacted the Commission directly but was refused. He was given an interview with the Commission investigators only after 9/11 family members intervened directly. Mr. Sarshar’s documented testimony was completely omitted from the commission’s final report, despite his case being publicly confirmed by Director Mueller’s Office.

Mike German, Special Agent, Counterterrorism; FBI - Mr. German served sixteen years as an FBI Special Agent and is one of the rare agents credited with actually having prevented acts of terrorism before it became the FBI's number one priority. He contacted the Commission in the spring of 2004, but did not receive a response. In 2002 he reported gross mismanagement in a post 9/11-counterterrorism investigation, which included serious violations of FBI policy and federal law. Mr. German contacted the 9/11 Commission during its investigation and requested that he be given an interview session in order to provide them with certain domestic counterterrorism investigations that he’d pursued. According to Mr. German there were links between certain domestic and international counterterrorism related to the September 11 attacks. The 9/11 Commissioners refused to acknowledge his request and never interviewed him.

Gilbert Graham, Retired Special Agent, Counterintelligence; FBI - Mr. Graham worked for the FBI’s Washington Field Office Counterintelligence Division until 2002. In February 2004 his name and contact information were provided to the Commission as a key witness with information pertinent to the Commission’s investigation. The 9/11 Commission refused to follow up and never contacted Mr. Graham.

Coleen Rowley, Retired Division Counsel; FBI - In May 2002, Coleen Rowley, as the Division Counsel at the FBI Minneapolis Office, blew the whistle on the FBI’s failure to pursue Zacarias Moussaoui’s case prior to 9/11, despite all attempts made by the Minneapolis division counterterrorism agents. She reported that FBI HQ personnel in Washington, D.C., had mishandled and neglected to take action on information provided by her division. Despite her high-profile case the commission chose not to interview Ms. Rowley. According to Ms. Rowley, no one from the FBI Minneapolis Office (several Agents had direct information) was ever asked to provide testimony, information, to the 9/11 Commission.

Lieutenant Colonel Anthony Shaffer, DIA - Colonel Shaffer provided the Commission with detailed information on intelligence and pre warning information obtained by his unit’s data mining project, Able Danger. The 9/11 commission staff received not one but two briefings on Able Danger from Mr. Shaffer and his former team members, yet did not pursue the case, did not follow up on this documented report and refused to subpoena the relevant files. Mr. Shaffer’s testimony, together with other witnesses who corroborated his testimony and information, were censored by the 9/11 Commissioners and never made it to its final report.

Dick Stoltz, Retired Special Agent; ATF- Mr. Stoltz, a veteran undercover agent with the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms, had played an important role in Operation Diamondback between 1998 and 2001. The sting operation involved a group of Middle Eastern men living in New Jersey who were caught on tape in an ATF weapons sting conspiring to buy millions of dollars of weapons including components for nuclear bombs. The case came to a screeching halt with the arrest of only a handful of suspects in June of 2001 even though there was ample evidence that some of the people who were attempting to buy these weapons had connections with the Taliban, Al Qaeda and Osama Bin Laden himself. The 9/11 Commission refused to contact Agent Stoltz despite all attempts made by several witnesses from the intelligence & Law Enforcement Communities, and the 9/11 Family group, Jersey Moms.

Bogdan Dzakovic, Former Red Team Leader; FAA - Mr. Dzakovic had worked for the Security Division of the Federal Aviation Administration since 1987 as a Special Agent, as a Team Leader in the Federal Air Marshals, and from 1995 until September 11, 2001 was a Team Leader of the Red Team (terrorist team). Mr. Dzakovic had tried for several years prior to the 9-11 attacks to improve aviation security in the face of the ever-increasing terrorist threat. He provided the 9/11 Commission with his testimony and documented reports. His testimony and report to the Commission was completely omitted from the final report.

Linda Lewis, Retired Emergency Programs Specialist; USDA - Ms. Lewis worked for 13 years evaluating and coordinating federal, state and local preparedness for nuclear, radiological and chemical weapons emergencies. Prior to September 11, 2001, she had reported numerous inadequacies and dysfunctions in emergency preparedness, including a culture of intimidation that discouraged federal evaluators from reporting inadequacies in state and local plans and preparedness. USDA officials had thwarted her efforts to bring in terrorism experts to help the agency prepare for attacks on federal buildings, including bio-weapons attacks such as the anthrax attacks of 2001. In vain, she had urged FEMA officials to develop a national emergency communications plan and require interoperability of federally funded emergency communications equipment. In the absence of these preparations, New York City firefighters and police officers were unable to communicate critical information on September 11 at the World Trade Center. Ms. Lewis contacted the Commission and offered to provide information regarding dysfunctional government preparedness, but the Commission never responded.

Mark Burton, Senior Analyst; NSA – Mr. Burton served as an all-source threat analyst in NSA’s Information Assurance Directorate (IAD) for most of his 16-year career. He was the editor of IAD’s premier threat document; the 300+ page ISSO Global Threat Summary, and was an adjunct faculty member at NSA’s National Cryptologic School. He provided dozens of pages of relevant information to the 9/11 Commission, but was completely ignored and never asked to testify.

The above list does not include many others from the intelligence and law enforcement communities who had similarly contacted or reported to the commission but had been either turned away or censored, and of course many others’ who are still working within these agencies and are fearful of making their identities known, due to the relentless pursuit of and retaliation against whistleblowers by government agencies.

About National Security Whistleblowers Coalition

National Security Whistleblowers Coalition (NSWBC), founded in August 2004, is an independent and nonpartisan alliance of whistleblowers who have come forward to address our nation’s security weaknesses; to inform authorities of security vulnerabilities in our intelligence agencies, at nuclear power plants and weapon facilities, in airports, and at our nation’s borders and ports; to uncover government waste, fraud, abuse, and in some cases criminal conduct. The NSWBC is dedicated to aiding national security whistleblowers through a variety of methods, including advocacy of governmental and legal reform, educating the public concerning whistleblowing activity, provision of comfort and fellowship to national security whistleblowers suffering retaliation and other harms, and working with other public interest organizations to affect goals defined in the NSWBC mission statement. For more on NSWBC visit www.nswbc.org

© Copyright 2006 National Security Whistleblowers Coalition

http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=2006090610003242

TwentyTwelve  posted on  2009-04-22   11:24:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Which proves what? Mental institutions still exist. Psychopaths still exist that existed before 9/11 too. You have made no point numbskull, but yet you think you have.

.and the .gov shills existed before 911.

TwentyTwelve  posted on  2009-04-22   11:25:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

JOKE 9/11 COMMISSION

The following Veteran National Security experts were turned away, ignored, or censored by the 9/11 Commission, even though they had direct and relevant information related to the Commission’s investigation:...

litus  posted on  2009-04-22   11:26:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Which proves what?

That no professional society of engineers or architects has disputed the 9/11 reports... 1

war  posted on  2009-04-22   12:25:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Your demands were met, and met again.

No they weren't. The target has not been moved.

But I don;t expect that to stop you from stomping your feet and holding your breath,

war  posted on  2009-04-22   12:26:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Mr. Cole had knowledge of certain activities that directly related to the terror attacks on September 11, 2001.

According to you Moonbats it was an inside job...how could it be a terror attack?

war  posted on  2009-04-22   12:27:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Coleen Rowley, Retired Division Counsel; FBI - In May 2002, Coleen Rowley, as the Division Counsel at the FBI Minneapolis Office, blew the whistle on the FBI’s failure to pursue Zacarias Moussaoui’s case prior to 9/11, despite all attempts made by the Minneapolis division counterterrorism agents. She reported that FBI HQ personnel in Washington, D.C., had mishandled and neglected to take action on information provided by her division. Despite her high-profile case the commission chose not to interview Ms. Rowley. According to Ms. Rowley, no one from the FBI Minneapolis Office (several Agents had direct information) was ever asked to provide testimony, information, to the 9/11 Commission.

You, yourself have ssaid that the planes were simply a diversion.

war  posted on  2009-04-22   12:28:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

You, yourself have ssaid that the planes were simply a diversion.

Of course they were. They camoflauged the sounds of explosions, as well as much of the other visual signs from the controlled demolition.

It wasn't an "either or" event.

They both happened.

Duh.

litus  posted on  2009-04-22   12:58:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Former Lurker is on bozo...is he still trying to post to me?

What a brave thing to do little man, hide behind the filter yet continue to spread your venom and lies here on this forum. It's awfully funny you respond directly to me at times when you wish to launch insults and lies, yet totally ignore my posts when I post proof and facts which you claim doesn't exist.

You're just a little weasle playing a little game here. The game is called trolling.

Tell your fellow Moonie here that the comment referred to "engineers" and not "engineers and architects".

Somebody tell war that he is lying. In post 42 war responds to TwentyTwelves' post 41...

#41. To: war, Former_Lurker (#40)

Post some proof that there are 100K engineers and architects who approve of the 9/11 Commission's findings.

How many enginners are there?

Proof that there are 100K engineers and architects who approve of the 9/11 Commission's findings.

TwentyTwelve posted on 2009-04-21 13:22:27 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

#42. To: TwentyTwelve (#41)

The proof is on this thread, moron. There aren't even 600 of them who object to it...

Math is an issue with you?

war posted on 2009-04-21 13:26:09 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

He didn't have a whole lot to say about those 660+ engineers and architects who question the 9/11 report. In fact, since it directly and absolutely proved his assertions wrong, it appears he put his tail between his legs and ran off.

It's obvious that war is playing a dishonest little game here. He asks people for a hard count of how many engineers and architects oppose the official 9/11 story (on another thread), is shown the answer twice on that thread, then claims that he never saw the information..

THEN he makes up a number, claims that there are that many who side with the government story, with ZERO proof of the number he fabricated and ZERO evidence that number of people would side with the government story.

Then he tries to play word games as to whether he was talking about apples, oranges, or apples and oranges.

It's obvious that war is enjoying trolling this forum.

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-04-22   13:22:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

According to you Moonbats it was an inside job...how could it be a terror attack?

You love to twist words around don't you shillster...

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-04-22   13:24:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

There are 125K enginners in the professional organization that assisted both FEMA and NIST in the 9/11 report.

Prove it. And what exactly is an enginner anyways? Does he sweep the floor for ENGINEERS?

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-04-22   13:28:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Then he tries to play word games as to whether he was talking about apples, oranges, or apples and oranges.

It's obvious that war is enjoying trolling this forum.

Completely obvious.

litus  posted on  2009-04-22   13:31:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

They camoflauged the sounds of explosions...

ROFLMAO...hold on, hold on...I need to make popcorn...

war  posted on  2009-04-22   13:50:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Completely obvious.

ALWAYS milk a laugh...

war  posted on  2009-04-22   13:50:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

IS FL trying to post to me still? He does know he's on filter?

war  posted on  2009-04-22   13:51:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

They both happened.

Chuckles...and if the hijakings were somehow thwarted...what was "Plan B"?

war  posted on  2009-04-22   13:52:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

IS FL trying to post to me still? He does know he's on filter?

As FL pointed out, that only happens after you demand he post information to you...then, back he goes onto your filter.

litus  posted on  2009-04-22   13:54:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

IS FL trying to post to me still? He does know he's on filter?

Hey troll, I know that you read my posts and more than likely don't really have me on bozo. Why would you have me on bozo, is it that I made your little head hurt with so many facts that you can't or don't want to understand?

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-04-22   13:55:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Why would you have me on bozo, is it that I made your little head hurt with so many facts that you can't or don't want to understand?

lolol!

litus  posted on  2009-04-22   13:56:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

if the hijakings were somehow thwarted...what was "Plan B"?

Don't you remember, they "were" in PA?

Where's the remains of the Plane??

Some believe it was taken out via missile.

You're too easy, war.

litus  posted on  2009-04-22   13:58:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I last posted to him on 4/14 as I saw that post PRIOR to signing in...before that I hadn't posted to him in 2 weeks.

When I am signed in...I cannot see his posts...thanks to the "CHECK PING" function here...I don't have to wade through nonsense...so, if I am not signed in, I sign in first and then hit check pings...

Regardless, it doesn;t matter whether it's you, FL, Jonsie or whomever...you coninutally ignore reality...you raise faux or meaningless objections - as this latest one is...as if I wouldn't realize that a fringe group of architects and engineers who banded together for the sole purpose of being Moonbats and whom all of YOU Moonies cite here, banded together for the purpose of being...wait for it...Moonbats...

war  posted on  2009-04-22   14:00:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Where are the remains of the AirTran plane that caught fire and crashed into the Everglades?

war  posted on  2009-04-22   14:03:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

DEBUNKING THE 911 OMISSION REPORT:

The following Veteran National Security experts were turned away, ignored, or censored by the 9/11 Commission, even though they had direct and relevant information related to the Commission’s investigation:

John M. Cole, Former Veteran Intelligence Operations Specialist; FBI - Mr. Cole worked for 18 years in the FBI’s Counterintelligence Division as an Intelligence Operations specialist, and was in charge of FBI’s foreign intelligence investigations covering India, Pakistan and Afghanistan. Mr. Cole had knowledge of certain activities that directly related to the terror attacks on September 11, 2001. He notified the 9/11 Commission during its investigation, but never received a response. His name and contact information was provided to the Commission as a key witness by other witnesses, but he was never contacted or interviewed.

John Vincent, Retired Special Agent, Counterterrorism; FBI - Mr. Vincent worked for the FBI for 27 1/2 years before retiring in 2002. He worked his last 8 years in counterterrorism in the FBI’s Chicago Field Office. Mr. Vincent, along with Robert Wright, exposed inefficiencies within the FBI in working counterterrorism cases, and certain warnings they had tried to pursue prior to the 9/11 attack that were directly related to Al-Qaeda’s financial network and money laundering activities. Although he was granted an interview, the commissioners’ investigators refused to let him provide them with information related to his case and the 9/11 terrorists network; they insisted on limiting the interview to only administrative and irrelevant questions and issues.

Robert Wright, Veteran Special Agent, Counterterrorism; FBI - Mr. Wright is a veteran special agent in the FBI Chicago Field Office Counterterrorism Unit. He had been investigating a suspected terrorist cell for three years, when he was informed in January 2001 that the case was being closed. Agent Wright, along with Mr. Vincent, exposed inefficiencies within the FBI in working counterterrorism cases and certain warnings they’d tried to pursue prior to the 9/11 attack that were directly related to Al-Qaeda’s financial network and money laundering activities. Three months before September 11, Wright wrote a stinging internal memo charging that the FBI was not interested in thwarting a terrorist attack, but rather "was merely gathering intelligence so they would know who to arrest when a terrorist attack occurred." The FBI refused to allow Wright to testify before the 9/11 Commission, however, the Commission did not insist or attempt to subpoena Wright; despite the fact that it had subpoena power.

Sibel Edmonds, Former Language Specialist; FBI - Ms. Edmonds worked for the FBI’s Washington Field Office as a language specialist with Top Secret Clearance performing translations for counterterrorism and counterintelligence operations dealing with Turkey, Iran, and Turkic speaking Central Asian countries. She contacted the 9/11 Commission in May 2003 and requested a meeting to provide them with information directly related to the terrorist attack. The Commission investigators refused to meet with Edmonds and informed her that due to their limited resources and time they were not going to interview all witnesses. She was able to provide the commission with information and documents only after certain 9/11 family members intervened directly. Ms. Edmonds’ testimony was completely censored by the Commission.

Behrooz Sarshar, Former Language Specialist; FBI - Mr. Sarshar worked for the FBI’s Washington Field Office as a language specialist with Top Secret Clearance performing Farsi translations for counterterrorism and counterintelligence operations dealing with Iran and Afghanistan. He had first- hand information of prior specific warning obtained from a reliable informant in April 2001 on the terrorist attacks of September 11. Mr. Sarshar contacted the Commission directly but was refused. He was given an interview with the Commission investigators only after 9/11 family members intervened directly. Mr. Sarshar’s documented testimony was completely omitted from the commission’s final report, despite his case being publicly confirmed by Director Mueller’s Office.

Mike German, Special Agent, Counterterrorism; FBI - Mr. German served sixteen years as an FBI Special Agent and is one of the rare agents credited with actually having prevented acts of terrorism before it became the FBI's number one priority. He contacted the Commission in the spring of 2004, but did not receive a response. In 2002 he reported gross mismanagement in a post 9/11- counterterrorism investigation, which included serious violations of FBI policy and federal law. Mr. German contacted the 9/11 Commission during its investigation and requested that he be given an interview session in order to provide them with certain domestic counterterrorism investigations that he’d pursued. According to Mr. German there were links between certain domestic and international counterterrorism related to the September 11 attacks. The 9/11 Commissioners refused to acknowledge his request and never interviewed him.

Gilbert Graham, Retired Special Agent, Counterintelligence; FBI - Mr. Graham worked for the FBI’s Washington Field Office Counterintelligence Division until 2002. In February 2004 his name and contact information were provided to the Commission as a key witness with information pertinent to the Commission’s investigation. The 9/11 Commission refused to follow up and never contacted Mr. Graham.

Coleen Rowley, Retired Division Counsel; FBI - In May 2002, Coleen Rowley, as the Division Counsel at the FBI Minneapolis Office, blew the whistle on the FBI’s failure to pursue Zacarias Moussaoui’s case prior to 9/11, despite all attempts made by the Minneapolis division counterterrorism agents. She reported that FBI HQ personnel in Washington, D.C., had mishandled and neglected to take action on information provided by her division. Despite her high-profile case the commission chose not to interview Ms. Rowley. According to Ms. Rowley, no one from the FBI Minneapolis Office (several Agents had direct information) was ever asked to provide testimony, information, to the 9/11 Commission.

Lieutenant Colonel Anthony Shaffer, DIA - Colonel Shaffer provided the Commission with detailed information on intelligence and pre warning information obtained by his unit’s data mining project, Able Danger. The 9/11 commission staff received not one but two briefings on Able Danger from Mr. Shaffer and his former team members, yet did not pursue the case, did not follow up on this documented report and refused to subpoena the relevant files. Mr. Shaffer’s testimony, together with other witnesses who corroborated his testimony and information, were censored by the 9/11 Commissioners and never made it to its final report.

Dick Stoltz, Retired Special Agent; ATF- Mr. Stoltz, a veteran undercover agent with the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms, had played an important role in Operation Diamondback between 1998 and 2001. The sting operation involved a group of Middle Eastern men living in New Jersey who were caught on tape in an ATF weapons sting conspiring to buy millions of dollars of weapons including components for nuclear bombs. The case came to a screeching halt with the arrest of only a handful of suspects in June of 2001 even though there was ample evidence that some of the people who were attempting to buy these weapons had connections with the Taliban, Al Qaeda and Osama Bin Laden himself. The 9/11 Commission refused to contact Agent Stoltz despite all attempts made by several witnesses from the intelligence & Law Enforcement Communities, and the 9/11 Family group, Jersey Moms.

Bogdan Dzakovic, Former Red Team Leader; FAA - Mr. Dzakovic had worked for the Security Division of the Federal Aviation Administration since 1987 as a Special Agent, as a Team Leader in the Federal Air Marshals, and from 1995 until September 11, 2001 was a Team Leader of the Red Team (terrorist team). Mr. Dzakovic had tried for several years prior to the 9-11 attacks to improve aviation security in the face of the ever-increasing terrorist threat. He provided the 9/11 Commission with his testimony and documented reports. His testimony and report to the Commission was completely omitted from the final report.

Linda Lewis, Retired Emergency Programs Specialist; USDA - Ms. Lewis worked for 13 years evaluating and coordinating federal, state and local preparedness for nuclear, radiological and chemical weapons emergencies. Prior to September 11, 2001, she had reported numerous inadequacies and dysfunctions in emergency preparedness, including a culture of intimidation that discouraged federal evaluators from reporting inadequacies in state and local plans and preparedness. USDA officials had thwarted her efforts to bring in terrorism experts to help the agency prepare for attacks on federal buildings, including bio-weapons attacks such as the anthrax attacks of 2001. In vain, she had urged FEMA officials to develop a national emergency communications plan and require interoperability of federally funded emergency communications equipment. In the absence of these preparations, New York City firefighters and police officers were unable to communicate critical information on September 11 at the World Trade Center. Ms. Lewis contacted the Commission and offered to provide information regarding dysfunctional government preparedness, but the Commission never responded.

Mark Burton, Senior Analyst; NSA – Mr. Burton served as an all-source threat analyst in NSA’s Information Assurance Directorate (IAD) for most of his 16- year career. He was the editor of IAD’s premier threat document; the 300+ page ISSO Global Threat Summary, and was an adjunct faculty member at NSA’s National Cryptologic School. He provided dozens of pages of relevant information to the 9/11 Commission, but was completely ignored and never asked to testify.

The above list does not include many others from the intelligence and law enforcement communities who had similarly contacted or reported to the commission but had been either turned away or censored, and of course many others’ who are still working within these agencies and are fearful of making their identities known, due to the relentless pursuit of and retaliation against whistleblowers by government agencies.

CREDIBLE CRITICS OF THE OFFICIAL ACCOUNT OF 9/11

Twenty-five U.S. Military Officers Challenge Official Account of 9/11 – Official Account of 9/11 “Impossible”, “A Bunch of Hogwash”, “Total B.S.”, “Ludicrous”, “A Well-Organized Cover-up”, “A White-Washed Farce” Jan. 14, 2008 PDF Version Article on OpEdNews

Eight U.S. State Department Veterans Challenge the Official Account of 9/11 – Official Account of 9/11 "Flawed", "Absurd", "Totally Inadequate", "a Cover-up" Jan. 5, 2008 PDF Version Article on OpEdNews

Seven Senior Federal Engineers and Scientists Call for New 9/11 Investigation – Official Account of 9/11 "Impossible", "Hogwash", "Fatally Flawed" Dec. 13, 2007 PDF Version Article on OpEdNews

Eight Senior Republican Administration Appointees Challenge Official Account of 9/11 – "Not Possible", "a Whitewash", "False" Dec. 4, 2007 PDF Version Article on OpEdNews

Seven CIA Veterans Challenge 9/11 Commission Report – Official Account of 9/11 a "Joke" and a "Cover-up" Sep. 23, 2007 PDF Version Article on OpEdNews

That's a few of the 170 senior military/intelligence/governement challengers. Add them to the 660 architects and engineeers, 190 pilots/aviation professionals, 370 professors and 290 survivors/family members who challenge the government account.

How you can continue to believe the 911 Omission report is beyond me.

abraxas  posted on  2009-04-22   14:13:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Where are the remains of the AirTran plane that caught fire and crashed into the Everglades?

That happened on 9/11?

Wow....I was beginning to suspect you might be changing the subject, again.

litus  posted on  2009-04-22   14:17:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Well Trollmeister you never cease to amuse. At this point between two or three threads you have managed to use virtually all of the Twenty Five Ways to Suppress The Truth: The Rules of Disinformation .

For any objective observer there can be little doubt that all you are doing is acting as a low paid, marginal IQ, government Trollbot. At no point have you added any substantive data which is not countered by multiple sources showing it to be false.

You cite "hunnerts of thousands" even gazillions of people who support the official lies and yet when it comes down to brass tacks you cite the same discredited sources over and over and over and over again. Of course mixed in with personal attacks and avoiding responding to any actual data presented.

You are engaging over and over and over and over again in disinformation tactics.

In your current post we have:

3. Create rumor mongers. Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method which works especially well with a silent press, because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such 'arguable rumors'. If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a 'wild rumor' from a 'bunch of kids on the Internet' which can have no basis in fact.

4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent's argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.

5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary 'attack the messenger' ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as 'kooks', 'right-wing', 'liberal', 'left-wing', 'terrorists', 'conspiracy buffs', 'radicals', 'militia', 'racists', 'religious fanatics', 'sexual deviates', and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.

8. Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority and present your argument with enough 'jargon' and 'minutia' to illustrate you are 'one who knows', and simply say it isn't so without discussing issues or demonstrating concretely why or citing sources.

9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues except with denials they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.

Example: 'Nothing you say makes any sense. Your logic is idiotic. Your facts nonexistent. Better go back to the drawing board and try again.'

Proper response: 'You are avoiding the issue with disinformation tactics. You evade the issues with your own form of nonsense while others, perhaps more intelligent than you pretend to be, have no trouble with the material. Why do you refuse to address the issues by use of such disinformation tactics (rule 9 - play dumb)?'

13. Alice in Wonderland Logic. Avoid discussion of the issues by reasoning backwards or with an apparent deductive logic which forbears any actual material fact.

17. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can 'argue' with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.

Not bad. You managed to include a total of 7 fallacies in one short paragraph. Way to go!

"I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is Mass Psychology...It's importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda...Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated." Bertrand Russel, Eugenicist and Logician

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-04-22   14:23:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

This was already posted to me today and on this thread and you Moonies wonder why I find you clueless...

war  posted on  2009-04-22   14:27:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

You cite "hunnerts of thousands" even gazillions of people who support the official lies and yet when it comes down to brass tacks you cite the same discredited sources over and over and over and over again.

How has the ASCE been discredited?

war  posted on  2009-04-22   14:28:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Oops! Forgot to include you in the ping list.

"I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is Mass Psychology...It's importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda...Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated." Bertrand Russel, Eugenicist and Logician

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-04-22   14:39:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Twenty Five Ways to Suppress The Truth: The Rules of Disinformation

17. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can 'argue' with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.

And invoking authority is not proof. Data, valid observations, is proof. Slinging names around of organizations that are political in nature, and dependent on government good will for towing the Party Line, is not proof. It is an argument based only upon authority.

Check of Proof: Replace ASCE in your argument with the Donut Dunkers Society and it loses all of its weight. Therefore we can conclude it is an argument based only upon an Appeal To Misleading Authority.

"I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is Mass Psychology...It's importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda...Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated." Bertrand Russel, Eugenicist and Logician

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-04-22   14:41:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Oops!!! You forgot to answer my question.

How has the ASCE been discredited?

war  posted on  2009-04-22   14:41:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

You wrote: ... when it comes down to brass tacks you cite the same discredited sources over and over and over and over again.

WAR: How has the ASCE been discredited?

war  posted on  2009-04-22   14:42:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Not bad. You managed to include a total of 7 fallacies in one short paragraph. Way to go!

What's he trying to do is get as many of them as possible in one post.

: )

litus  posted on  2009-04-22   14:45:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I think he did set a record. Heretofore the most I've seen, saving BAC, is 3 or 4.

He's definitely well trained in disinformation tactics.

"I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is Mass Psychology...It's importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda...Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated." Bertrand Russel, Eugenicist and Logician

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-04-22   14:48:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

This was already posted to me today and on this thread and you Moonies wonder why I find you clueless...

It's obvious that you don't bother to read any information that contradicts your government consipiracy theory, no matter who posts or whom defies the government charade. You ignore what you cannot intellectually argue.

Clueless is continuing to cheerleader without offering any data beyond the Omission report to back up your claims. You prefer to digress to insults because you have no intellectual argument to substantiate your claims.

You learned well on LP to divert from the subject matter with insults, but that sort of lame diversion doesn't work so well at 4um.

abraxas  posted on  2009-04-22   14:54:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

It's obvious that you don't bother to read any information that contradicts your government consipiracy theory...

What is obvious is that you have your head up your ass and you can't understand twhy the flashlight you ahve in your hand isn't helping.

Helpful Hint: I commented on some specifics contained in what you accuse me of not reading.

war  posted on  2009-04-22   15:00:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

He's definitely well trained in disinformation tactics.

I agree.

litus  posted on  2009-04-22   15:00:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Comments (120 - 167) not displayed.

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]