See other Immigration Articles
Title: Chris Simcox to challange McCain in the senate primary
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.simcoxforsenate.com/
Published: Apr 21, 2009
Author: Chris Simcox
Post Date: 2009-04-21 18:59:29 by Jethro Tull
Keywords: None
Views: 81
Comments: 7
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Jethro Tull (#0)
Chris assumes that the marxists have a) the sense that God gave a horse and b) any desire whatsoever to actually fight for their freedom. Ask him about 'anchor babies' and see what he says.
Using Microsoft Word: 1- Type in NYC , the place of the first 911 attacks 2- Change the font to 'wingdings' 3- Enlarge the text size to see it better, say 48
I have no idea what he thinks, OTOH I do know what McCain thinks and how he acts. Since 3rd parties register 0.00001% of the voting public, I suppose those living in AZ can choose bet. either of these two in the primary.
Personally, I don't like Simcox. I think he's a scam artist - a fraud. The fence MCDC collected money for was never finished. It still remains less than 25% complete. All personal feelings aside, Simcox has been looking for a compromise with regards to the illegal immigration population since at least December of 2007. Here are a few quotes and links for you to read and judge for yourself where he stands and if you want to support his beliefs. December 2007 The Hard Work of Compromise: America Needs a Comprehensive Immigration Policy
So Simcox v McCain seems to be the classic "lesser of two evils" choice. Thanks for the info, on to Hayworth!
That's exactly what it is. I'm not voting that way ever again.
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams 
#2. To: Jethro Tull (#0)
#3. To: Rotara (#1)
#4. To: Rotara (#1)
#5. To: Jethro Tull (#0)
Yet Simcox agreed with others that society cannot afford the kind of social friction that immigration debates create. "We're all victims of government failure -- in Arizona and in Washington, D.C.," he said. "We need a compromise. And I'm willing to lead that compromise."
Issue Clash: Immigration Simcox Answers Questions: Q: What stance should the U.S. government take regarding the estimated 11 million undocumented immigrants living in the U.S?
A: It is against the law to enter the U.S. without authorization. Anyone discovered to be in the U.S. illegally, who has committed a crime, has stolen someone's identity, or has obtained false documents should be deported and never allowed to reenter the U.S. for any reason. The major problem we have is what to do with the children who were brought into the U.S. illegally. If they have been here since they were a child, they should be allowed to be put on a fast track to gain citizenship. Immediately declaring that the 14th Amendment does not grant automatic birthright citizenship will cut off the magnet that attracts people to take advantage of our charity.
Q: President Obama says longtime undocumented immigrants should have a path to citizenship in the U.S. Do you agree?
A: On a case-by-case basis I would agree that if someone is found to be living in the U.S. illegally, has been gainfully employed, has paid their taxes and has not committed a crime, I feel that we certainly can make an exception. But this will be the last time, and I would only accept that after our borders are secured and illegal immigration is no longer an out of control problem.
Q: Should undocumented immigrants with children born in the U.S. be allowed to stay here?
A: First we must immediately end automatic birthright citizenship, and then proceed on a case-by-case basis. If the child is under the age of 18, then their parents should be allowed to stay in the U.S. to seek citizenship unless they commit a crime. However, if citizenship is not processed before the child turns 18, then the parents must then self-deport.
“They need to be brought out of the shadows. They need to be documented and swear an oath to become a citizen,” he said. “If they do that, then by all means they deserve the opportunity that anyone else has.” ~ Chris Simcox, the American DREAM Act, SB170
We need JD Hayworth to run.
#6. To: mel_living (#5)
#7. To: Jethro Tull (#6)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest