See other Religion Articles
Title: Details surrounding current Hate Crimes legislation in Congress: Adds “sexual orientation” and “gender identity” as protected classes
Source:
Tennessee Eagle Forum
URL Source: http://www.votervoice.net/Core.aspx ... CULTURE%3den-us%3aAPP%3dGAC%24
Published: Apr 25, 2009
Author: United States Congress - HR 1913 IH
Post Date: 2009-04-25 03:06:12 by HAPPY2BME-4UM
Keywords: HATE CRIMES, HOMOSEXUAL, LESBIAN, CONGRESS
Views: 390
Comments: 19
Details surrounding current Hate Crimes legislation in Congress:
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 8.
#5. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#0)
E-Alerts: http://www.truthtellers.org/index.html * 27 Apr 09 - Demand 'Yes' or 'No' on Pedophile-Protecting Hate Bill! * 27 Apr 09 - Pike, Evangelical Leaders Plot Hate Bill Strategy * 25 Apr 09 - Don't Give Pedophiles Hate Bill Protection! * 23 Apr 09 - Hate Bill Passes Judiciary, With Pedophiles Protected! http://www.truthtellers.org/alerts/hatebillpassesjudic.htm HATE BILL PASSES JUDICIARY, WITH PEDOPHILES PROTECTED! Liberals Refuse to Exclude Gay Pedophiles from Federal Protection! By Rev. Ted Pike In a shocking conclusion to the second day of hearings on the federal hate crimes bill, HR 1913, House Judiciary Democrats rejected the final amendment of Rep. Steve King (R, IA). He insisted that "sexual orientation" in the bill specifically be defined as not including pedophiles. Rep. Tammy Baldwin (D, WI) objected, saying King's amendment was "unnecessary and inflammatory." She asserted that "sexual orientation," as defined by the Hate Crimes Statistics Act of 1990, means consensual heterosexual or homosexual sex. That definition, she claimed, is sufficient to exclude pedophiles. Before any Republicans could respond in support King's bold and essential amendment, Judiciary Chairman Conyers cut off debate, calling for an immediate vote, which upheld Baldwin. When Republicans objected, Conyers said he had not noticed them wanting to debate Baldwin's position, an absurd, unbelievable lie! The truth is that a large percentage of homosexuals, especially males, are actual or potential pedophiles. From at least the time of the ancient Greeks, their ultimate sexual quarry has been underage boys who "consent" to have sex with them. (In homosexual jargon, gay men are "chicken hawks," boys "chickens.") Boy prostitution is an enormous part of the gay scene in large cities, especially under pro-homosexual mayors who often instruct the police to look the other way. The liberals promoting HR 1913 are determined, at all costs, to protect the entire homosexual community as the primary beneficiaries of the hate bill. As we saw today, they were terrified of allowing Republicans to fragment federal protection of homosexuals into "protected versus unprotected" members. Such fragmentation would destroy their hate bill, dedicated to special protection of all homosexuals, regardless of degree of perversion. They do not want the pedophile members of NAMBLA (the North American Man-Boy Love Association) to be deprived of the same perks and protection under federal law enjoyed by "respectable" homosexuals who cohabit only with adults. Homosexuals as a specific "class" must remain inviolate. On the other hand, "straight" pedophiles who have heterosexual sex with little girls would remain without specially protected status, punishable under conventional law. Rep. Gohmert in his remarks during the last several minutes of the hearing protested the committee's highhandedness of not allowing the distinction in the bill between child-molesting homosexuals and "law-abiding" ones. He reiterated that "sexual orientation" can have the widest possible connotations within the term "homosexuality." Yet Judiciary liberals rejected such demand for specificity. They voted to pass the hate bill with such built-in ambiguity concerning sexual orientation so that any homosexual can claim special protection for his aberrant brand of perversion. Because the framers of this bill refuse to exclude homosexual pedophiles from protection under it, they include them. Because a pedophile is a lawbreaker, this bill gives special protection to criminals. Clearly, the House Judiciary Committee has now sent a powerful message that all deviant brands of homosexuality are welcome on the federal hate crimes bandwagon. No homosexual, whether he be into sado-masochism, bestiality, transvestism, necrophilia (sex with the dead), or pedophilia, should consider himself outside special protection. An irate Gohmert now predicts that any parent who physically assaults a homosexual pedophile attacking his or her child will become a federal hate criminal. Any young man who hits back against a homosexual hitting on him will become guilty of the "hate crime" of "bias-motivated assault." Surely, if the hate bill threat has not moved you to pick up your phone and protest to Congress, the fact of HR 1913's implicit protection of all deviant members of the gay community, including pedophiles, should cause you to react with outrage. Had enough? Call 1-877-851-6437 toll free or 1-202-225-3121 toll and tell your members of Congress: "Please don't vote for Rep. Conyers' hate crimes bill, HR 1913. It gives special protection to homosexuals, including those who are pedophiles. Hate laws have taken away free speech in Canada and many European countries." Watch the dynamic 10-minute educational video How to Kill the Hate Bills at http://www.truthtellers.org which explains how the two hate bills, HR256 and HR262, end freedom. Please tell the offices of members of Congress to watch it! Also at http://www.truthtellers.org, watch our gripping 82-minute documentary Hate Laws: Making Criminals of Christians. Let the Anti-Defamation League teach you how they have saddled 45 states with hate laws capable of persecuting Christians, and spearhead attempts to pass the federal hate crimes bill: http://www.adl.org/99hatecrime/intro.asp. TALK SHOW HOSTS: Interview Rev. Ted Pike on this subject. Call (503) 631-3808. http://www.truthtellers.org/alerts/hatebillpassesjudic.htm Sex with Children by Talmud Rules Using young children for sex (including homosexual sex) is not forbidden by the Talmud Sages, provided the child is young enough. ... http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/america_2.html ------------ Noachide Judges and Courts will Replace the Existing Court System of Each Country "Upon seizing the reins of government, the new Noachide leaders will move quickly to implement a full agenda of reform. ... Jewish courts ... will be granted full legal sovereignty over Jewish citizens within each country, who will no longer be subject to the authority of gentile courts. The pre-existing Noachide judges and courts will replace the existing court system of each country, and the legal code will be drastically rewritten to conform to halacha...." http://www.cephas-library.com/nw...ts_will_replace_ours.html http://www.aztlan.net/metzitzah_b_peh.htm Jewish Rabbis Give Baby Boys Herpes via Circumcision http://www.aztlan.net/metzitzah_b_peh.htm [The problem of how to protect perverts and Judaism solved.] The National Prayer Network's Homepage Ted Pike Discuss the Hate Bill Threat! ... Watch: Hate Laws: Making Criminals of Christians (82-minute video) ... http://www.truthtellers.org Obama [ http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=96074&Disp=58#C58 ] has declared that America is not a Christian nation anymore. Well, SOMEONE had to set the stage for the battle at hand. Christ is King of Israel, and Christians are the Israelitic race [and America is our Promised Land: http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=93210&Disp=3#C3 ]
Where did this concept originate from ? Who is responsible for it ?
In one word. God.
How did He get the news to us ? Was there a memo I missed ?
There are no replies to Comment # 8. End Trace Mode for Comment # 8.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
23 Apr 09 
#6. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#5)
America is our Promised Land
#7. To: Rotara (#6)
Where did this concept originate from ? Who is responsible for it ?
#8. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#7)
In one word. God.
Replies to Comment # 8.