[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The death of Yu Menglong: Political scandal in China (Homo Rape & murder of Actor)

The Pacific Plate Is CRACKING: A Massive Geological Disaster Is Unfolding!

Waste Of The Day: Veterans' Hospital Equipment Is Missing

The Earth Has Been Shaken By 466,742 Earthquakes So Far In 2025

LadyX

Half of the US secret service and every gov't three letter agency wants Trump dead. Tomorrow should be a good show

1963 Chrysler Turbine

3I/ATLAS is Beginning to Reveal What it Truly Is

Deep Intel on the Damning New F-35 Report

CONFIRMED “A 757 did NOT hit the Pentagon on 9/11” says Military witnesses on the scene

NEW: Armed man detained at site of Kirk memorial: Report

$200 Silver Is "VERY ATTAINABLE In Coming Rush" Here's Why - Mike Maloney

Trump’s Project 2025 and Big Tech could put 30% of jobs at risk by 2030

Brigitte Macron is going all the way to a U.S. court to prove she’s actually a woman

China's 'Rocket Artillery 360 Mile Range 990 Pound Warhead

FED's $3.5 Billion Gold Margin Call

France Riots: Battle On Streets Of Paris Intensifies After Macron’s New Move Sparks Renewed Violence

Saudi Arabia Pakistan Defence pact agreement explained | Geopolitical Analysis

Fooling Us Badly With Psyops

The Nobel Prize That Proved Einstein Wrong

Put Castor Oil Here Before Bed – The Results After 7 Days Are Shocking

Sounds Like They're Trying to Get Ghislaine Maxwell out of Prison

Mississippi declared a public health emergency over its infant mortality rate (guess why)

Andy Ngo: ANTIFA is a terrorist organization & Trump will need a lot of help to stop them

America Is Reaching A Boiling Point

The Pandemic Of Fake Psychiatric Diagnoses

This Is How People Actually Use ChatGPT, According To New Research

Texas Man Arrested for Threatening NYC's Mamdani

Man puts down ABC's The View on air

Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka


War, War, War
See other War, War, War Articles

Title: U.S. Soldier Who Killed Herself--After Refusing to Take Part in Torture
Source: Editor and Publisher
URL Source: http://www.editorandpublisher.com/e ... .jsp?vnu_content_id=1003965876
Published: Apr 25, 2009
Author: Greg Mitchell
Post Date: 2009-04-25 08:40:57 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 2187
Comments: 61

U.S. Soldier Who Killed Herself--After Refusing to Take Part in Torture With each new revelation on U.S. torture in Iraq, Afghanistan and Gitmo, I am reminded of the chilling story of Alyssa Peterson.

(April 23, 2009) -- With each new revelation on U.S. torture in Iraq, Afghanistan and Gitmo (and who, knows, probably elsewhere), I am reminded of the chilling story of Alyssa Peterson, who I have written about numerous times in the past three years but now with especially sad relevance. Appalled when ordered to take part in interrogations that, no doubt, involved what we would call torture, she refused, then killed herself a few days later, in September 2003.

Of course, we now know from the torture memos and the U.S. Senate committee probe and various new press reports, that the "Gitmo-izing" of Iraq was happening just at the time Alyssa got swept up in it.

Alyssa Peterson was one of the first female soldiers killed in Iraq. A cover-up, naturally, followed.

Peterson, 27, a Flagstaff, Ariz., native, served with C Company, 311th Military Intelligence BN, 101st Airborne. Peterson was an Arabic-speaking interrogator assigned to the prison at our air base in troubled Tal Afar in northwestern Iraq. According to official records, she died on Sept. 15, 2003, from a "non-hostile weapons discharge."

A "non-hostile weapons discharge" leading to death is not unusual in Iraq, often quite accidental, so this one apparently raised few eyebrows. The Arizona Republic, three days after her death, reported that Army officials "said that a number of possible scenarios are being considered, including Peterson's own weapon discharging, the weapon of another soldier discharging, or the accidental shooting of Peterson by an Iraqi civilian." And that might have ended it right there.

But in this case, a longtime radio and newspaper reporter named Kevin Elston, not satisfied with the public story, decided to probe deeper in 2005, "just on a hunch," he told me in late 2006 (there's a chapter about it in my book on Iraq and the media, "So Wrong for So Long"). He made "hundreds of phone calls" to the military and couldn't get anywhere, so he filed a Freedom of Information Act [FOIA] request. When the documents of the official investigation of her death arrived, they contained bombshell revelations. Here's what the Flagstaff public radio station, KNAU, where Elston then worked, reported:

"Peterson objected to the interrogation techniques used on prisoners. She refused to participate after only two nights working in the unit known as the cage. Army spokespersons for her unit have refused to describe the interrogation techniques Alyssa objected to. They say all records of those techniques have now been destroyed."

According to the official report on her death released the following year, she had earlier been "reprimanded" for showing "empathy" for the prisoners. One of the most moving parts of that report is: "She said that she did not know how to be two people; she ... could not be one person in the cage and another outside the wire."

Peterson was then assigned to the base gate, where she monitored Iraqi guards, and sent to suicide prevention training. "But on the night of September 15th, 2003, Army investigators concluded she shot and killed herself with her service rifle," the documents disclose.

A notebook she had been writing was found next to her body. Its contents were redacted in the official report.

The Army talked to some of Peterson's colleagues. Asked to summarize their comments, Elston told me: "The reactions to the suicide were that she was having a difficult time separating her personal feelings from her professional duties. That was the consistent point in the testimonies, that she objected to the interrogation techniques, without describing what those techniques were."

Elston said that the documents also refer to a suicide note found on her body, which suggested that she found it ironic that suicide prevention training had taught her how to commit suicide. He filed another FOIA request for a copy of the actual note.

Peterson, a devout Mormon, had graduated from Flagstaff High School and earned a psychology degree from Northern Arizona University on a military scholarship. She was trained in interrogation techniques at Fort Huachuca in Arizona, and was sent to the Middle East in 2003.

A report in The Arizona Daily Sun of Flagstaff -- three years after Alyssa's death -- revealed that Spc. Peterson's mother, Bobbi Peterson, reached at her home in northern Arizona, said that neither she nor her husband Richard had received any official documents that contained information outlined in Elston's report.

In other words: Like the press and the public, even the parents had been kept in the dark.

Tomorrow I will write about Kayla Williams, a woman who served with Alyssa, and talked to her about her problems shortly before she killed herself, and also took part in torture interrogations. She observed the punching of detainees and was forced to take part in one particular tactic: prisoners were stripped naked, and when they took off their blindfolds the first thing they saw was Kayla. She opted out, but survived, and is haunted years later.

Here's what Williams told Soledad O'Brien of CNN : "I was asked to assist. And what I saw was that individuals who were doing interrogations had slipped over a line and were really doing things that were inappropriate. There were prisoners that were burned with lit cigarettes."

All of this only gains relevance in light of the current debate over whether those who were "just following orders" in torture routines should be held accountable today. * Greg Mitchell's latest book is "Why Obama Won." His previous book on Iraq and the media was "So Wrong for So Long." He is editor of Editor & Publisher.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 13.

#1. To: Ada, All (#0)

The wrong person died.

The ones that need to die are the ones that willingly, and joyfully, tortured people, including women and children. No one held a gun to their head and forced them to do this. Blaming the chain of command is a cop out. NO ONE is forced to obey unlawful orders. The nazis didn't get away with that bullshit "defense" at Nuremberg, and they wont get away with it now.

So, I still dont care what happens to our soldiers, because they were all in on it, from private up to general.

If I found out today that they were all wiped out, I wouldn't shed a tear, because they are no better than the nazis were. In short, fuck 'em.

.

PSUSA  posted on  2009-04-25   9:15:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: PSUSA (#1)

The nazis didn't get away with that bullshit "defense" at Nuremberg, and they wont get away with it now.

The Nazis were tortured for their BS confessions. Especially those concerning the Holocaust. I never thought I would see the Nazis in a good light, but the more I learn the more I realize they weren't the monsters we were led to believe they were.

RickyJ  posted on  2009-04-25   9:28:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: RickyJ (#2) (Edited)

The Nazis were tortured for their BS confessions. Especially those concerning the Holocaust. I never thought I would see the Nazis in a good light, but the more I learn the more I realize they weren't the monsters we were led to believe they were.

They also murdered civilians as reprisals. They also murdered people in Russia that originally greeted them as liberators.

I agree, sometimes I think the nazis were right, about wanting to deport the jews. But they weren't little angels either.

.

PSUSA  posted on  2009-04-25   9:36:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: PSUSA (#3) (Edited)

The Nazis were tortured for their BS confessions. Especially those concerning the Holocaust. I never thought I would see the Nazis in a good light, but the more I learn the more I realize they weren't the monsters we were led to believe they were.

They also murdered civilians as reprisals. They also murdered people in Russia that originally greeted them as liberators.

Yes, they did. Many Ukranians were happy to see the Germans arrive in somewhat that same way that many Iraqis greeted the American incursion into Mesopotamia. In neither case did the architects of those invasions have the interests of their subject peoples at heart. The rest is history.

Having met a spoken with veterans and a few real nazis who sitnessed those events, I know that most of them didn't participate in any more mayhem or butchery than was required of them as soldiers. But all of them, the party member at least, were infected by moral blindness that was endemic in their time. The elites, large and small, rode that wave to its inevitable conclusion.

The same sort of attitudes that were common among the people in Germany at that time are current in our own country. There's subservience to authority and an uncritical acceptance to the myths that nurture it that grows like a bad weed. But I still love this country, because there is a streak of stiff-necked independence in the air here that chafes at being told what to do and think. There's a "screw you, jack" attitude that you don't see in Europe that isn't dependent on trade unionism or narrow group interest. I believe that, in the long run, the idea that we have Rights for their own sake will be much more difficult if not impossible to stamp out.

randge  posted on  2009-04-25   11:27:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: randge (#6) (Edited)

But I still love this country,

Same here, and for the same reasons you list. We're a minority, but we're growing. I hope... But I am a little selective on just who I decide to love.

This might sound like melodramatic BS, but IMHO the minority here are what is keeping the so-called "elites" plans from being carried out. They are the ones worthy of loyalty.

But if we allow ourselves to be disarmed, the planet dies. They have to disarm us. They have no choice, they must have a monopoly on using force. And that, IMO, will be their undoing.

.

PSUSA  posted on  2009-04-25   11:38:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: PSUSA, randage, Rotara, TooConservative (#7) (Edited)

"But I still love this country, because there is a streak of stiff-necked independence in the air here that chafes at being told what to do and think."

I'm going to argue that America is no better than anywhere else. We've failed to demonstrate that in any way, shape or form since around 1812. In fact, we'd better start asking ourselves what is buried in our culture that permits us to be enslaved, while calling others slaves. It's the worst hypocrisy in the history of the human race.

Deasy  posted on  2009-04-25   11:41:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Deasy (#8)

I'm going to argue that America is no better than anywhere else.

Since I have never crossed a border, I will rely on those that have. And they have universally said that they were always glad to come back, because as bad as we think we have it now, others have it much worse.

PSUSA  posted on  2009-04-25   11:43:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: PSUSA (#9)

We live in a colonial empire, with all of the benefits. Are you proud to have relative prosperity and a higher standard of living when it depends on slavery and the exploitation of the world's natural resources?

Deasy  posted on  2009-04-25   11:46:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Deasy (#10) (Edited)

Nope. We dont exploit the worlds resources, we exploit people. That involves exploiting (read: stealing) their resources but there is so much more to that.

I am not proud of anything this country has done. I loathe this country and this entire world system. My pride is in the minority, the so-called "nobodies". We the minority had the country stolen from us because we made the mistake of believing that everyone else is as straightforward and as honest as we are.

We can rebuild on that minority. But IMO we need a crash of the current system first.

.

PSUSA  posted on  2009-04-25   12:02:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: PSUSA (#11) (Edited)

Nope. We dont exploit the worlds resources, we exploit people.

The people whose land is raped by our consumption are definitely exploited, no question about that. That doesn't mean we're not exploiting the world's natural resources, as well.

My question is why we do we think we're special in any way. We had a good Declaration of Independence. Our Articles of Confederacy were excellent. Things went downhill with the Constitution, and especially its amendments.

Here we have one of the world's most centrally planned economic systems yet we dare to interfere overseas with the pretext of liberating the citizens of foreign countries.

What we're really doing is heisting their pools of natural resources and their labor.

A system based on exploitation collapses when potential "growth" is limited. The world is freeing itself from the power we have exerted over them. This is an interesting time in history especially for that reason.

What is it about our system that permitted this to happen in the first place? If we're hell bent to "restore" what eventually led to what we have now, it will only recur. We started out our history based on opposition to empire, and then we became one almost overnight.

Deasy  posted on  2009-04-25   12:12:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Deasy (#12)

The people whose land is raped by our consumption are definitely exploited, no question about that. That doesn't mean we're not exploiting the world's natural resources, as well.

My question is why we do we think we're special in any way. We had a good Declaration of Independence. Our Articles of Confederacy were excellent. Things went downhill with the Constitution, and especially its amendments.

Here we have one of the world's most centrally planned economic systems yet we dare to interfere overseas with the pretext of liberating the citizens of foreign countries.

What we're really doing is heisting their pools of natural resources and their labor.

A system based on exploitation collapses when potential "growth" is limited. The world is freeing itself from the power we have exerted over them. This is an interesting time in history especially for that reason.

Amen.

I believe that we never live up to the ideal, represented by the DoI, etc. We gave up instead of striving for that ideal. Scripture says we are here to be overcomers. Instead most are quitters. We had a good start, but just like the Church, that good start went downhill fast.

This is an interesting time in history

The Chinese consider that to be a curse ;)

Ah well, we're all long for the ride, like it or not.

.

PSUSA  posted on  2009-04-25   12:18:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 13.

#14. To: PSUSA (#13)

I'm getting at something here. Our so-called liberty, which we thought we had won in the revolution, failed to last more than a generation. The very philosophical foundations on which we built this political system must have been flawed.

Deasy  posted on  2009-04-25 12:22:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 13.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]