[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Paul Joseph Watson: Bournemouth 1980 Vs 2025

FDA Revokes Emergency Authorization For COVID-19 Vaccines

NATO’s Worst Nightmare Is Happening Right Now in Ukraine - Odessa is Next To Fall?

Why do men lose it when their chicky-poo dies?

Christopher Caldwell: How Immigration Is Erasing Whites, Christians, and the Middle Class

SSRI Connection? Another Trans Shooter, Another Massacre – And They Erased His Video

Something 1/2 THE SIZE of the SUN has Entered our Solar System, and We Have NO CLUE What it is...

Massive Property Tax Fraud Exposed - $5.1 Trillion Bond Scam Will Crash System

Israel Sold American Weapons to Azerbaijan to Kill Armenian Christians

Daily MEMES YouTube Hates | YouTube is Fighting ME all the Way | Making ME Remove Memes | Part 188

New fear unlocked while stuck in highway traffic - Indian truck driver on his phone smashes into

RFK Jr. says the largest tech companies will permit Americans to access their personal health data

I just researched this, and it’s true—MUST SEE!!

Savage invader is disturbed that English people exist in an area he thought had been conquered

Jackson Hole's Parting Advice: Accept Even More Migrants To Offset Demographic Collapse, Or Else

Ecuador Angered! China-built Massive Dam is Tofu-Dreg, Ecuador Demands $400 Million Compensation

UK economy on brink of collapse (Needs IMF Bailout)

How Red Light Unlocks Your Body’s Hidden Fat-Burning Switch

The Mar-a-Lago Accord Confirmed: Miran Brings Trump's Reset To The Fed ($8,000 Gold)

This taboo sex act could save your relationship, expert insists: ‘Catalyst for conversations’

LA Police Bust Burglary Crew Suspected In 92 Residential Heists

Top 10 Jobs AI is Going to Wipe Out

It’s REALLY Happening! The Australian Continent Is Drifting Towards Asia

Broken Germany Discovers BRUTAL Reality

Nuclear War, Trump's New $500 dollar note: Armstrong says gold is going much higher

Scientists unlock 30-year mystery: Rare micronutrient holds key to brain health and cancer defense

City of Fort Wayne proposing changes to food, alcohol requirements for Riverfront Liquor Licenses

Cash Jordan: Migrant MOB BLOCKS Whitehouse… Demands ‘11 Million Illegals’ Stay

Not much going on that I can find today

In Britain, they are secretly preparing for mass deaths


Resistance
See other Resistance Articles

Title: Jackson Michigan Area Police Receive Several Calls About Residents Carrying Sidearms
Source: Jackson Citizen Patriot
URL Source: http://www.mlive.com/news/jackson/i ... on_area_police_receive_se.html
Published: Apr 27, 2009
Author: Steven Hepker
Post Date: 2009-04-27 15:00:01 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 377
Comments: 20

Monday April 27, 2009, 2:17 PM

An apparent organized flexing of Second Amendment rights last weekend was a bit too Wild West for some local citizens and business owners.

Police and deputies responded to a number of complaints about citizens packing sidearms at restaurants, stores and other public areas.

None of the gun carriers was cited.

Michigan's 2001 shall-issue concealed weapons law greatly increased the number of citizens packing handguns. The public, however, does not notice the guns because they are hidden under clothing.

But a shopper with a handgun on his hip in Target is another matter. Security officers followed the man Saturday and contacted city police.

"One of our officers had contact with the man in the parking lot, and that was the end of it," Lt. Christopher Simpson said. "He was carrying legally."

Blackman Township officers responded to reports of a diner with a handgun in a hip holster at Bob Evans Restaurant on West Avenue, and another with a visible sidearm at Wal-Mart on E. Michigan Avenue.

"We verified they were legitimate side carries," Blackman Township Public Safety Director Jon Johnston said.

While the appearance of citizens carrying weapons is unsettling to some, it also is an expression of freedom.

"Sometimes it is a matter of educating the public that this is a constitutional right," Johnston said. "We do not take enforcement action against those who obey the law."

Sheriff's deputies, meanwhile, were called to Vandercook Lake to check out two suspicious males, each carrying a handgun on his side.

It was a father and son, and the father also was packing two concealed handguns, sheriff's Capt. Kevin Stellingworth said. The father has a concealed-weapons permit.

Stellingworth and Undersheriff Thomas Finco said that citizens who exercise the right to carry guns openly should realize it alarms the public and police.

"It hypes people up to see someone carrying a gun," Finco said. "What people don't realize is it is perfectly legal."

Aside from designated pistol-free areas, such as schools, bars, stadiums, churches and hospitals, most public and private areas in Michigan are open to both concealed weapons and open sidearms.

Stellingworth said law officers and business owners cannot become complacent regarding citizens showing weapons.

Because more citizens are choosing to carry weapons in public, police trainers are addressing that by incorporating scenarios in which officers approach those who could be exercising a right, or are up to no good.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 18.

#1. To: Brian S (#0)

Because more citizens are choosing to carry weapons in public, police trainers are addressing that by incorporating scenarios in which officers approach those who could be exercising a right, or are up to no good.

Visibility is increasing!!

Police admit it is a right!!

Training scenarios change to accommodate open carriers!!

Good news, friends...

echo5sierra  posted on  2009-04-27   15:26:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: echo5sierra, Brian S, all (#1)

I believe that we have an open-carry bill proposed here in TX.

Lod  posted on  2009-04-27   15:32:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: lodwick (#2) (Edited)

I believe that we have an open-carry bill proposed here in TX.

I thought you already had that right..

Refinersfire  posted on  2009-04-27   15:53:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Refinersfire (#3)

I thought you already had that right..

We do, under the Constitution, but in Texas, the state constitution says the legislature has the power to regulate the wearing of arms to prevent crime.

Gag

echo5sierra  posted on  2009-04-27   16:00:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: echo5sierra (#6)

That takes Texas off of my, move to list.. Thanks, I think, for the update..

Refinersfire  posted on  2009-04-27   16:16:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Refinersfire (#9)

That takes Texas off of my, move to list.. Thanks, I think, for the update..

Wyoming is an "Open Carry" State - no permits, no nothing. Just strap on the ol' Hawg Leg and take a stroll.

Oregon, where I currently live, is a "Shall Issue" State, but no Open Carry.

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-04-28   2:03:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Original_Intent (#15)

Oregon, where I currently live, is a "Shall Issue" State, but no Open Carry.

Are you sure about that?

Check Opencarry.org. They have maps that can tell you for sure. You might be surprised.

echo5sierra  posted on  2009-04-28   11:08:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 18.

#19. To: echo5sierra (#18)

I just jogged quickly through the 50 States and...

State Constitution There is NO provision for the right to keep and bear arms in the Minnesota Constitution. Holy crap - I had no idea ! Even ND and Idiots Out Wandering Around (iowa) include a Constitutional protection at the State level. With that bulls#it 5-4 decision recently by the Supreme 'Roos, it's going to boil down to certain States imo.

Sovereignty resolution draws fears of secession (http://bozemandailychronicle.com/articles/2009/04/23/news/10resolution.txtsuccession)

By DANIEL PERSON Chronicle Staff Writer

HELENA - Whether a resolution debated on the House floor Wednesday was a call for secession or an affirmation of the U.S. Constitution depended on who was doing the talking at any given moment.

House Resolution 3, sponsored by Rep. Michael More, R-Gallatin Gateway, was a sweeping statement on state rights.

“For those of you who would like the abbreviated version, here it is: The right to govern is derived from the consent of the governed. That is what this resolution is all about,” More said.

Among other things, the resolution states that “any acts of Congress that abridge protected individual freedoms are not law and are void” and “every state has a right to ignore or reject all unwarranted assumptions of power by other entities within its boundaries.”

Knowing the charges were coming, More said the resolution was not about seceding from the union, only an affirmation of the rights granted by the Constitution.

But those charges came anyway from several Democrats.

Pointing to the last line of the resolution, which states that Montana’s contract with the United States should be considered broken if Congress passes a law breaching the “reservations” of the resolution, Rep. Mike Menahan, D-Helena, said, “If this isn’t groundwork for seceding from the union, I don’t know what is.”

Rep. Franke Wilmer, D-Bozeman, said Texas Gov. Rick Perry had just signed a similar resolution in his state before speaking to a rally at which chants of “secession” arose.

“We don’t serve the Constitution of our government by passing anti-government resolutions like this,” Wilmer said.

Many Republicans countered there was nothing anti-American about the resolution.

“There is no revolution. There are some very angry people about the overreaching of government,” said Rep. Ed Butcher, R-Winifred. “This is very pro-government, because government is of and by the people,”

Yet some Republicans didn’t shirk at the thought of secession.

“This is a federal government be-good stick,” said Rep. Krayton Kerns, R-Laurel. “Now there is talk of secession. (The resolution) isn’t saying that. But that is the big stick in the room that we have to occasionally display.

“This is a shot across the bow that says, ‘Hey, don’t forget about us out here,’” Kerns said.

Rep. Robyn Driscoll, D-Billings, said such shots could lead to dangerous places.

“Buried in this resolution is the same confrontational language and ideals that the Freemen and Timothy McVeigh stood for,” she said. “This resolution sends us down a similar path as the Freemen.”

Some wanted the 35-minute debate to continue, but the House voted to close the debate.

The resolution failed on a 50-50 vote. All 50 Republicans voted for the resolution. All 50 Democrats voted against.

Daniel Person can be reached at dperson@dailychronicle.com.

As a recovering repubican, I'm still thankful everyday I never acquired the pathology of the commie RATS. I'm finally just an American now. America will be never more if the bass turds aren't stopped very soon. Voila ! Flu Pandemic !!

Rotara  posted on  2009-04-28 11:27:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 18.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]