Title: Kathrine Albrecht Interview on SPY CHIPS (RFID) Source:
gcnlive URL Source:[None] Published:May 2, 2009 Author:Kathrine Albrecht Post Date:2009-05-02 19:59:50 by Itistoolate Keywords:None Views:312 Comments:25
~ she does a good job of stating the facts but I wonder sometimes if the public at large is getting this info too late? perhaps time to develop a jamming method for these devices or an RFID of our own that sends back a coded message - "Bugger Off!"
~ tis better to live as your own man, than as a fool in someone elses dream ~
First Off, I want to apologize for the poor video quality, when I heard the Completely Corrupt Bush announcing the Mark of the Beast system, I was in a room that only had a old-school VCR and a well used tape. But the video and what Bush said was clear enough to know what time it is. How appropriate, that on 06/06/06, Bush announces the Biometric Mark of the Beast system. Now the AC Bush speaks of the Biometric IDs for foreign workers, to start with, but this is only the reason given to implement the infrastructure of the Mark. You all know that what starts with one group soon appplies to all. 666 is here. Everyone, feel priviledged that you live in the last days. Prepare, GET YOUR HOUSE IN ORDER!!! STEEL YOUR SPIRIT, MIND, AND BODY. THE TIME IS AT HAND. HEED THE OMEN !!! REBELLION RADIO WILL AIR SOON ON THE FOLLOWING MYSPACE PROFILE:
WASHINGTON The majority of Jewish voters in the US presidential election voted for the Democratic Party's candidate, and now US president-elect, Barack Obama, Wednesday's segmentation of the votes revealed.
According to the data, 78% of the Jewish voters in the US lent their vote to Obama while only 21% voted for his opponent, Republican Senator John McCain.
Back in 2004, for the sake of comparison, 75% of the Jewish vote went to Democratic candidate John Kerry, while US President George W. Bush received just 24% of the votes. The 2000 presidential election saw 82% of the Jewish voters choose the Democrat's Al Gore, a decision believed to be motivated partially because Gore chose Jewish Senator Joe Lieberman as his running mate.
Barack Obama had to fight for the Jewish vote. Initial campaign polling data indicated that 30% of the Jewish votes were McCain's, and the Republicans soon began a smear campaign against Obama in order to widen the gap.
Beginning with mass emails reporting of Obama's supposed Muslim background and culminating in attempts to portray him as pro-Palestinian and link him to known terrorists, the Republicans went on to spend some $2 million on advertisement on television and in various Jewish newspapers in the US, to that effect.
Campaign efforts were aimed at states known for their large Jewish communities, such as Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Nevada. Political sources in Washington, however, denied the Republican's campaign ever overtly targeted the Jewish voters.
Efforts aside, the Jewish vote began swaying in Obama's direction in June. McCain himself may have given the Jewish vote a nudge at his opponent's direction when he chose Alaska Governor Sarah Palin for his running mate.
Palin's conservative views on a variety of social issues, do not coincide with those of the majority of America's Jews.
"We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years.
It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government.
The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries." ~ David Rockefeller, founder of the Trilateral Commission, in an address to a meeting of The Trilateral Commission, in June, 1991.
666 is here. Everyone, feel priviledged that you live in the last days.
~ got hired into a union job once in PA, dark 'n dingy warehouse with a few hundred of us useless eaters binding and packaging legal pads no less .... my union scale starting wage? $6.66 per hour ~ was like rubbing it in my face ~ I thought they were joking, they did not like my laughing, almost lost the interview *LOL* ~ quit 1/2 way through my third night ... was just too damn creepy for me
~ tis better to live as your own man, than as a fool in someone elses dream ~
RFID is not the demon purported here. RFID is a tool used for inventory control, passports, ID cards, and the like. But in everything? Not a chance.
Also will everything in the world be tracked? Can't be done. Think bandwidth. Ever see what happens to broadband cable when too many people get on at the same time? Imagine the bandwidth issues for the tracking that is being suggested in the video. Heck, I use RFID and smart cards every day; mainly my ID badges et al.
Disagree. Bandwidth is not an issue at all. Today's networks and database systems can store, hold, and search petabytes of data. And gathering the initial data is really no challenge. With a sensitive enough RFID antenna and an RFID sticker on your license plate, ever car's movements could be tracked at every major interchange on every highway in the country. And are you happy that ID badges can track employees everywhere they go?
RFID is a tool of empire, and will be used to close what few gaps in our freedoms we had left.
And without these chips, we will not be able to do business at all. But Americans will be told that these items are indispensable and convenient. And they will accept them, like they have every other link in our chains.
ID badge tracking in a workplace is often nesessary. Especially for access control. Tracking across the nation? Yea, bandwidth is an issue. Petabytes of storage is common. Heck my office computers have terrabytes on them, but moving that kind of data in realtime? Hardly. Check out the cost of installing a T3/OC3 to just one location.
Prove that bandwidth is a problem. The data moving from a typical RFID scanner is minuscule, even with hundreds of scans per second. The number of cars moving past a single scanner on a freeway would be in the 15 to 20 per second range, maximum. We're talking kilobytes per second, and only then in extreme cases. A dial up modem could move compressed RFID data.
In the mid-20th century, we didn't have cameras and RFID scanners in the work place. Somehow things still got done properly. Today? Middle class people are scanned, photographed, video-taped, and finger printed where they work, but the upper classes still steal or mismanage billions and get away with it.
Think before you advocate or accept technology.
How does it feel being tracked like a sheep or a cow, Doc?
I'll bet you have a cell phone too.
I don't feel like a sheep. Grins.
And what I carry? Usually I have my:
Blackberry
LG Cell phone with Bluetooth headset
UMPC (OQO-02) with Bluetooth folding keyboard
At least one or even two 16-gigabyte thumb drives
iPod Touch (replaced my HP48GX calculator) does that and more with apps
Smart cards
IDs/badges
Digital wristwatch
One or possibly two 8Gig micro SD cards
Red/Green laser pointer (the green works great for presentations)
And Laptop when needed
Sounds like a lot but all of it fits nicely in my suit pockets and/or briefcase.
(My car even has OnStar. XM, and GPS nav) - I especially like the OnStar. Can be tracked it if it gets stolen and will call emergency if my airbag deploys)
The NSA is already gathering such quantities of data, and the technology for gathering orders of magnitude more information is already available. This will happen, and Mr. and Mrs. America will beg Homeland Security to do it, to protect them against patriots.
Gots to dash. I have a long day tomorrow. Will continue this in the evening if I have time.
It has been interesting. Thank you all for the fine conversation so far. I am not all knowing so I will look into this and ponder your posts. I can be wrong on many things.