[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Taxpayer Funded Censorship: How Government Is Using Your Tax Dollars To Silence Your Voice

"Terminator" Robot Dog Now Equipped With Amphibious Capabilities

Trump Plans To Use Impoundment To Cut Spending - What Is It?

Mass job losses as major factory owner moves business overseas

Israel kills IDF soldiers in Lebanon to prevent their kidnap

46% of those deaths were occurring on the day of vaccination or within two days

In 2002 the US signed the Hague Invasion Act into law

MUSK is going after WOKE DISNEY!!!

Bondi: Zuckerberg Colluded with Fauci So "They're Not Immune Anymore" from 1st Amendment Lawsuits

Ukrainian eyewitnesses claim factory was annihilated to dust by Putin's superweapon

FBI Director Wray and DHS Secretary Mayorkas have just refused to testify before the Senate...

Government adds 50K jobs monthly for two years. Half were Biden's attempt to mask a market collapse with debt.

You’ve Never Seen THIS Side Of Donald Trump

President Donald Trump Nominates Former Florida Rep. Dr. Dave Weldon as CDC Director

Joe Rogan Tells Josh Brolin His Recent Bell’s Palsy Diagnosis Could Be Linked to mRNA Vaccine

President-elect Donald Trump Nominates Brooke Rollins as Secretary of Agriculture

Trump Taps COVID-Contrarian, Staunch Public Health Critic Makary For FDA

F-35's Cooling Crisis: Design Flaws Fuel $2 Trillion Dilemma For Pentagon

Joe Rogan on Tucker Carlson and Ukraine Aid

Joe Rogan on 62 year-old soldier with one arm, one eye

Jordan Peterson On China's Social Credit Controls

Senator Kennedy Exposes Bad Jusge

Jewish Land Grab

Trump Taps Dr. Marty Makary, Fierce Opponent of COVID Vaccine Mandates, as New FDA Commissioner

Recovering J6 Prisoner James Grant, Tells-All About Bidens J6 Torture Chamber, Needs Immediate Help After Release

AOC: Keeping Men Out Of Womens Bathrooms Is Endangering Women

What Donald Trump Has Said About JFK's Assassination

Horse steals content from Sara Fischer and Sophia Cai and pretends he is the author

Horse steals content from Jonas E. Alexis and claims it as his own.

Trump expected to shake up White House briefing room


Religion
See other Religion Articles

Title: Biblical Pool Uncovered in Jerusalem
Source: LA Times
URL Source: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationw ... 9aug09,1,1584700.story#Scene_1
Published: Aug 9, 2005
Author: Thomas H. Maugh II
Post Date: 2005-08-09 12:07:39 by BTP Holdings
Keywords: Uncovered, Jerusalem, Biblical
Views: 1079
Comments: 87

Biblical Pool Uncovered in Jerusalem

The reservoir served as a gathering place for Jews making pilgrimages and is said in the Gospel of John to be the site where Jesus cured a blind man.

By Thomas H. Maugh II, Times Staff Writer
August 9, 2005

Workers repairing a sewage pipe in the Old City of Jerusalem have discovered the biblical Pool of Siloam, a freshwater reservoir that was a major gathering place for ancient Jews making religious pilgrimages to the city and the reputed site where Jesus cured a man blind from birth, according to the Gospel of John.

The pool was fed by the now famous Hezekiah's Tunnel and is "a much grander affair" than archeologists previously believed, with three tiers of stone stairs allowing easy access to the water, said Hershel Shanks, editor of the Biblical Archaeology Review, which reported the find Monday.

"Scholars have said that there wasn't a Pool of Siloam and that John was using a religious conceit" to illustrate a point, said New Testament scholar James H. Charlesworth of the Princeton Theological Seminary. "Now we have found the Pool of Siloam … exactly where John said it was."

A gospel that was thought to be "pure theology is now shown to be grounded in history," he said.

Religious law required ancient Jews to make a pilgrimage to Jerusalem at least once a year, said archeologist Ronny Reich of the University of Haifa, who excavated the pool. "Jesus was just another pilgrim coming to Jerusalem," he said. "It would be natural to find him there."

The newly discovered pool is less than 200 yards from another Pool of Siloam, this one a reconstruction built between AD 400 and 460 by the Empress Eudocia of Byzantium, who oversaw the rebuilding of several biblical sites.

The site of yet another Pool of Siloam, which predated the version reputedly visited by Jesus, is still unknown.

That first pool was constructed in the 8th century BC by Judean King Hezekiah, who foresaw the likelihood that the Assyrians would lay siege to Jerusalem and knew a safe water supply would be required to survive the attack.

He ordered workers to build a 1,750-foot-long tunnel under the ridge where the City of David was located. The tunnel connected Gihon Spring in the adjacent Kidron Valley to the side of Jerusalem less vulnerable to an attack.

The first Pool of Siloam was the reservoir holding the water brought into the city. It was presumably destroyed in 586 BC when Babylonian King Nebuchadnezzar razed the city.

The pool of Jesus' time was built early in the 1st century BC and was destroyed by the future Roman Emperor Titus about AD 70.

The pool was discovered by a repair team excavating a damaged sewer line last fall under the supervision of Eli Shukron of the Israel Antiquities Authority. As soon as Shukron saw two steps uncovered, he stopped the work and called in Reich, who was excavating at the Gihon Spring.

When they saw the steps, Shukron said, "we were 100% sure it was the Siloam Pool."

With winter approaching, the two men had to hurry their excavation so the sewer could be repaired before the rainy season.

As they began digging they uncovered three groups of five stairs each separated by narrow landings. The pool was about 225 feet long, and they unearthed steps on three sides.

They do not yet know how wide and how deep the pool was because they have not finished the excavation. The fourth side lies under a lush garden — filled with figs, pomegranates, cabbages and other fruits — behind a Greek Orthodox Church, and the team has not yet received permission to cut a trench through the garden.

"We need to know how big it is," Charlesworth said. "This may be the most significant and largest miqveh [ritual bath] ever found."

The excavators have been able to date the pool fairly precisely because of two fortunate occurrences that implanted unique artifacts in the pool area.

When ancient workmen were plastering the steps before facing them with stones, they either accidentally or deliberately buried four coins in the plaster. All four are coins of Alexander Jannaeus, a Jewish king who ruled Jerusalem from 103 to 76 BC. That provides the earliest date at which the pool could have been constructed.

Similarly, in the soil in one corner of the pool, they found about a dozen coins dating from the period of the First Jewish Revolt against Rome, which lasted from AD 66 to 70. That indicates the pool had begun to be filled in by that time.

Because the pool sits at one of the lowest spots in Jerusalem, rains flowing down the valley deposited mud into it each winter. It was no longer being cleaned out, so the pool quickly filled with dirt and disappeared, Shanks said.

The story of Jesus and the blind man, as told in John, is well known. Jesus was fleeing the Temple to escape either the priests or an angry crowd when he encountered the man. His disciples asked Jesus who had sinned, the man or his parents, to cause him to be born blind.

Jesus said that neither had sinned, but that the man had been born blind so that God's work might be revealed in him. With that, he spat in the dust to make mud, which he rubbed in the man's eyes before telling him to wash it off in the Pool of Siloam. When the man did so, he was able to see.


Poster Comment:

Holy water network

Archaeologists uncovered an ancient water system outside Jerusalem. Two months of digging at Kibbutz Tzuba ended this week when the rock-hewn conduction network, dating to the time of King Hezekiah in the 8th century B.C.E., was unearthed. Last year the site received world-wide attention with the discovery of a cave said to have been used by John the Baptist and his followers for baptism. It was a monumental enterprise with a vertical shaft, an open horizontal corridor, a flight of stone steps above a tunnel and three external plastered pools, all of which was on a slope above an underground reservoir.

Archaeologists say the new discoveries shed light on why this cave would have been chosen, out of the many thousands in the hills of Judah, for bathing rituals. “What baptizers wanted was a place, distant from nearby villages, large enough to contain groups of people coming to be immersed, and ancient enough so that the cultic side of the rituals was put into a context linking them to the time of the Israelite prophets,” said the dig’s leader, Shimon Gibson.

http://jta.org/brknews.asp?id=153197

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 36.

#1. To: BTP Holdings, *Bereans* (#0)

"Scholars have said that there wasn't a Pool of Siloam and that John was using a religious conceit" to illustrate a point, said New Testament scholar James H. Charlesworth of the Princeton Theological Seminary. "Now we have found the Pool of Siloam 70; exactly where John said it was."

A gospel that was thought to be "pure theology is now shown to be grounded in history," he said.

Fyi...

Starwind  posted on  2005-08-09   16:04:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Starwind (#1)

A gospel that was thought to be "pure theology is now shown to be grounded in history," he said.

I don't think anyone ever disputed certain archaeology or geography of the bible. They wrote about the Red Sea. The Red Sea lies between Egypt and the Arabian penunsula. Therefore everything must be true!

Now if they could just come up with the talking donkeys, living 900 year old men and whales with ample living space and no digestive fluids and I will be converted. That's one soul saved! Surely the eternal kingdom has room for one more on it's gold-paved streets. They would need to change Revelation to state "144,001" souls though, not sure whom I can petition for that change.

Dude Lebowski  posted on  2005-08-09   21:25:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Dude Lebowski, Flintlock (#2)

Now if they could just come up with the talking donkeys,

lol - they have... look in a mirror lately?

Starwind  posted on  2005-08-09   22:13:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Starwind (#7)

look in a mirror lately?

Every day

Starwind, you did a great job of exposing badeye at El Pee. You spotted all the inconsistencies in this posts and proved to everyone he was a fraud

May I suggest you look for similar inconsistencies in your rapture theology?

Flintlock  posted on  2005-08-09   22:38:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Flintlock (#9)

May I suggest you look for similar inconsistencies in your rapture theology?

So, tell me what, precisely, is my rapture theology, and then if would kindly point out my inconsistencies thereby, and I'll address that, sincerely and honestly.

Starwind  posted on  2005-08-09   22:41:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Starwind (#10)

So, tell me what, precisely, is my rapture theology,

You do believe in "the rapture", right?

Flintlock  posted on  2005-08-09   22:50:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Flintlock (#12)

You do believe in "the rapture", right?

And what is "the rapture" about which you believe my theology to be inconsistent?

Starwind  posted on  2005-08-09   23:16:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Starwind (#18)

I asked a simple question and wanted a yes or no answer.

It me try again, do you believe in the rapture?

Here's another question (again, yes, or no, please):

Do you believe Muslims worship the Devil, Satan?

Flintlock  posted on  2005-08-09   23:21:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Flintlock (#21)

May I suggest you look for similar inconsistencies in your rapture theology?

I asked a simple question and wanted a yes or no answer. It me try again, do you believe in the rapture?

As you very well know, you first asserted my rapture theology was inconsistent. I asked how so, and I said I'd give you an honest answer, depending on what you thought those inconsistencies were.

Now instead of you explaining the inconsistencies in my rapture theology, you've backed tracked to asking me if I believe in the rapture. Seemingly now, you're not quite as sure as you thought what my theology was.

Yes, I believe in what the bible describes as "the rapture" in 1Thes 4:16-17. Now what about that is inconsistent?

Starwind  posted on  2005-08-09   23:34:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Starwind (#24)

Yes, I believe in what the bible describes as "the rapture" in 1Thes 4:16-17. Now what about that is inconsistent?

OK, so why don't Catholics, and Eastern Orthodox Churches believe in it?

And what about Muslims, are they Devil worshipers?

Flintlock  posted on  2005-08-09   23:38:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: Flintlock (#25)

OK, so why don't Catholics, and Eastern Orthodox Churches believe in it? And what about Muslims, are they Devil worshipers?

lol - get them on this thread and ask them what they believe. Don't expect me to speak for them. I speak for myself, what I believe.

We seem to be pretty far afield now from your initial assertions about my theologcal inconsistencies, to what others do or do not believe.

Starwind  posted on  2005-08-09   23:44:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: Starwind (#26)

We seem to be pretty far afield now from your initial assertions about my theologcal inconsistencies, to what others do or do not believe.

Not at all, you're avoiding the question. The facts are that you and the rest of the rapture crowd are establishing doctrine on one single scripture (1Thes 4:16-17).

This is a violation of a Biblical Principle:

Gen 41:32 "And the dream was repeated to Pharaoh twice because the thing is established by God, and God will shortly bring it to pass.

Deut 17:6"Whoever is deserving of death shall be put to death on the testimony of two or three witnesses; he shall not be put to death on the testimony of one witness.

Cor 13:1 This will be the third time I am coming to you."By the mouth of two or three witnesses every word shall be established."

1Thes 4:16-17 the only scripture that even suggests that believers will be "raptured" (caught up together with them in the clouds)

Outside of a small minority of believers in this county, nobody else believes it.

Now, what about Muslims.

Flintlock  posted on  2005-08-09   23:58:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Flintlock (#28)

Not at all, you're avoiding the question. The facts are that you and the rest of the rapture crowd are establishing doctrine on one single scripture (1Thes 4: 16-17).

You still don't know what I believe. You first asserted my theology was inconsistent, then you had to ask if I believed at all, and now you're again assuming you know something of my theology and that it also conforms to the "rapture crowd" whoever they are. Where was all that insight a few posts back?

I don't know what the "rapture crowd" believes, and no, 1 thes 4:16-17 isn't the only scripture, though it is the one from which "the rapure" term comes, there are others from which the doctrine draws as well.

Outside of a small minority of believers in this county, nobody else believes it.

Outside of an even smaller minority still, nobody else seems to belive in the entire bible - most decide to leave out the parts they find inconvenient and in conflict with what they want to believe. Those who choose to disbelieve the rapture choose to ignore Paul's clear teaching on it 1 Thes 4 and 1 Cor 15, and Jesus initially spoke of a similar event in Matt 24:37-42.

Starwind  posted on  2005-08-10   0:16:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Starwind (#34)

Those who choose to disbelieve the rapture choose to ignore Paul's clear teaching on it

Now I understand.

You're right and everybody else is wrong; including some Orthodox Churches with well over 1500 years of history and study.

They didn't figure it out after studying the Bible for 1500 years but you and the Schofield/Moody crowd did in an afternoon.

It makes perfect sense.

Flintlock  posted on  2005-08-10   0:36:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 36.

#38. To: Flintlock (#36)

You're right and everybody else is wrong; including some Orthodox Churches with well over 1500 years of history and study.

I believe the bible is right as written, and I don't know what everybody else thinks.

They didn't figure it out after studying the Bible for 1500 years but you and the Schofield/Moody crowd did in an afternoon.

I'm not with the Scofield/Moody crowd (though I recognize how utterly dependent you are upon labels and hyperbole to defend your viewpoint).

Starwind  posted on  2005-08-10 00:46:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 36.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]