[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Paul Joseph Watson: Bournemouth 1980 Vs 2025

FDA Revokes Emergency Authorization For COVID-19 Vaccines

NATO’s Worst Nightmare Is Happening Right Now in Ukraine - Odessa is Next To Fall?

Why do men lose it when their chicky-poo dies?

Christopher Caldwell: How Immigration Is Erasing Whites, Christians, and the Middle Class

SSRI Connection? Another Trans Shooter, Another Massacre – And They Erased His Video

Something 1/2 THE SIZE of the SUN has Entered our Solar System, and We Have NO CLUE What it is...

Massive Property Tax Fraud Exposed - $5.1 Trillion Bond Scam Will Crash System

Israel Sold American Weapons to Azerbaijan to Kill Armenian Christians

Daily MEMES YouTube Hates | YouTube is Fighting ME all the Way | Making ME Remove Memes | Part 188

New fear unlocked while stuck in highway traffic - Indian truck driver on his phone smashes into

RFK Jr. says the largest tech companies will permit Americans to access their personal health data

I just researched this, and it’s true—MUST SEE!!

Savage invader is disturbed that English people exist in an area he thought had been conquered

Jackson Hole's Parting Advice: Accept Even More Migrants To Offset Demographic Collapse, Or Else

Ecuador Angered! China-built Massive Dam is Tofu-Dreg, Ecuador Demands $400 Million Compensation

UK economy on brink of collapse (Needs IMF Bailout)

How Red Light Unlocks Your Body’s Hidden Fat-Burning Switch

The Mar-a-Lago Accord Confirmed: Miran Brings Trump's Reset To The Fed ($8,000 Gold)

This taboo sex act could save your relationship, expert insists: ‘Catalyst for conversations’

LA Police Bust Burglary Crew Suspected In 92 Residential Heists

Top 10 Jobs AI is Going to Wipe Out

It’s REALLY Happening! The Australian Continent Is Drifting Towards Asia

Broken Germany Discovers BRUTAL Reality

Nuclear War, Trump's New $500 dollar note: Armstrong says gold is going much higher

Scientists unlock 30-year mystery: Rare micronutrient holds key to brain health and cancer defense

City of Fort Wayne proposing changes to food, alcohol requirements for Riverfront Liquor Licenses

Cash Jordan: Migrant MOB BLOCKS Whitehouse… Demands ‘11 Million Illegals’ Stay

Not much going on that I can find today

In Britain, they are secretly preparing for mass deaths


Resistance
See other Resistance Articles

Title: WHAT TO EXPECT, MEANDERING SPECULATIONS
Source: News With Views
URL Source: http://www.newswithviews.com/Stang/alan198.htm
Published: May 3, 2009
Author: Alan Stang
Post Date: 2009-05-03 20:45:49 by echo5sierra
Keywords: None
Views: 468
Comments: 16

For years, I have been speculating about the weapon the conspiracy for world government would use to precipitate the panic that would cause America to demand its own enslavement. When the conspiracy launched the present financial debacle, I thought the question had been answered. As obvious as it was, it had never occurred to me that the conspiracy would choose two such weapons to work in tandem.

But maybe it has. Will they finally succeed in launching the deadly pandemic that has fizzled in several attempts? A pandemic offers many unique elements. When you drop bombs on people, they know they are being attacked. Also, bombs don’t kill everyone. But when you launch a weaponized pandemic, people don’t know that for sure. Sickness happens – even pandemics happen – without criminal encouragement. The Black Death happened by itself. And a pandemic involves everyone.

Imagine people broke and homeless now facing a deadly disease. It is now possible that the Communists who control the Executive Branch may be deliberately trying to provoke a massive, popular reaction they can use to justify martial law and the concentration camps that would be part of it. In this case, they would call it “quarantine,” and uninfected Americans, worried about their children, would applaud when the government puts the sick on the bus.

The program would include vaccinations, which would include the usual poisons. Remember that the 1976 version of the swine flu vaccination killed more people than the disease itself. Recently, the Baxter pharmaceutical company “accidentally” sent weaponized deadly, live H5N1 avian flu virus to eighteen countries, an “accident” that is impossible and was discovered only by a genuine accident. Had it been injected into humans in all those countries, there would have been an instant pandemic for sure. Czech newspapers were talking conspiracy. Now comes word that Baxter will make the vaccine to fight the Mexican flu. What? Yes.

Health Ranger Mike Adams speculates that “for this to have been a natural combination of viral fragments, it means an infected bird from North America would have had to infect pigs in Europe, then be re-infected by those same pigs with an unlikely cross-species mutation that allowed the bird to carry it again, then that bird would have had to fly to Asia and infect pigs there, and those Asian pigs then mutated the virus once again (while preserving the European swine and bird flu elements) to become human transmittable, and then a human would have had to catch that virus from the Asian pigs –in Mexico! – and spread it to others.” Again, this is just one of many possible speculations.

Meanwhile, we have an affirmative action pretend “President” who almost blatantly hates the system he governs. Has there ever been such a critter in world history? Even psychotic exterminators like Stalin, Castro, Hitler and Mao professed to love the countries they governed. But Mr. Big Ears delights in telling dictators who want to destroy us how criminal we are.

The Declaration of Independence is the nation’s birth certificate. It can never be revoked. It says that whenever a government becomes oppressive, “destructive” of the people’s rights, they have the right to “alter or abolish it.” President Tom Jefferson says that every generation the tree of liberty must be altered with the “blood of patriots and tyrants.” Why would there be blood? Because governments don’t want to be abolished. They worship the power and lust for more.

Most of the time, the only way to abolish them is by force. That is why there would be blood. The Declaration says we have that right. President Tom encourages us to use it. Obviously he is talking about usurpation so total that the government is no longer the one the Founding Fathers left us but a totalitarian perversion. In such a case, he says, it is not only the people’s right to throw off such government; it is their duty.

We are very close to that situation now. Is that why people have bought every last round of ammunition in the country and then some? If Americans do as the President suggests, there would be blood, much blood, and death. Are they mentally prepared for that? Are they close to the intolerable desperation in which they have nothing to lose?

Whom would they be shooting at? In the excitement of getting it, I wonder how many people now laden down with ammo have thought about all this. Would they have the heart for it? So far, I have seen no discussion of these historic questions. No one is happier than I am that our people are so heavily armed. Have they taken time to think about the answers?

My hope and my belief are that, after years of exposés about the conspiracy for world government, enough Americans now understand the conspiracy is trying to provoke them to go military – wants them to rebel – providing the government the excuse to suppress them. My prayer is that such a horror never happens.

But we do have the Declaration and we do have authorization, even encouragement, from the President; we do know that political liberty and freedom of speech are being squelched and that we are moving into full blown totalitarian socialist dictatorship. Permanent cancellation of elections would not necessarily be a clue. Stalin had elections. They allow the people to vent. He was always “elected.”

Listening and reading about what could happen, I see a picture emerge. By the way, remember that I do not propose anything. I merely convey what I hear. In fact, I fervently hope none of this comes to pass. I am talking about the people DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano, the Arizona bull dyke, is afraid of; the veterans she fears could become terrorists and who know how to do things. I am listening to them.

Of course the real terrorists are the communazis who run our government and who already lay a heavy hand on the people’s necks. Remember that Lenin created modern terrorism: “Without mercy, without sparing, we will kill our enemies in scores of hundreds. Let them be thousands. . . .” Felix Dzerzhinsky, his secret police chief, said: “We stand for organized terror. . . .” Terror to Lenin did not mean people rising up against the government. It meant government terrorizing people.

I believe there will be a series of incidents. The psychological pressure cooker artificially created on both sides is already too great to contain. As the Seventh Avenue girdle manufacturer once put it, “Something’s got to give.” The danger is that these isolated incidents could get out of control.

Happily, I do not believe that danger is great. Stonewall Jackson and Robert E. Lee should be forgiven for not recognizing soon enough that they faced satanic Communist monsters. Had they known in time, Jackson could perhaps have followed the fleeing Yankees all the way in to Washington after first Manassas, arrested our first Communist President and restored the Union. Lee said after Appomattox that had he known what he confronted soon enough, he would have fought to the last man.

But by now, after more than a century of Communism, after decades of alarms by a small band of tireless watchmen on the walls, I believe this generation of patriots is too knowledgeable to commit suicide by confronting a U.S. military liberated from the restraints of posse comitatus and persuaded by Napolitano that the patriots are “terrorists.” In lieu of such suicide, alternate scenarios are emerging.

One of the strangest posits a scenario in which the administration now is openly Nazi, denying the fundamental rights the Constitution guarantees. Elections are Stalinist charades. Police state controls make rebellion impossible. The judicious period of sober observation President Tom says must pass before a decision is made to “alter or abolish” a government has long since expired.

Suddenly, according to this scenario, the perpetrators begin to disappear. One by one by one, they vanish. There would be no shooting, no violence. One day they would be there, whistling while they work, reveling in confiscation of the people’s wealth, in loading people onto trucks, etc.; the next day they would not.

Of course, the men I hear talking do not mean people like affirmative action pretend “President” Mr. Big Ears. All Americans are united in the fervent hope that the Secret Service will keep him safe; the Obamatrons because they are morons who believe he is the One, the patriots because they want to see him humiliated and imprisoned for his crimes.

The same thing would apply to people like enemy alien chief-of-staff Rahm Emanuel, “the hemorrhoid.” Patriots want him safe for the same reason and he is no doubt too hard to reach, anyway. So, no, the scuttlebutt is not about Rahm. It is about the good folks who must leave the protected federal enclave to implement federal policy, not the police but, rather, the low- to mid-level people who do the confiscating, the speechmaking, the inspecting, the intimidating, etc.

Certainly one thing that inspires uncontrollable fear is uncertainty. Why did So-and-So at the next desk or in the next office disappear? People disappear for many reasons every day. Most of them have not been kidnapped. Maybe they were just fed up. Maybe they took the money and are sitting on a beach in Cancun, soaking up the flu. Maybe next week they will show up. In this case, there are no demands. There is no ransom. There are no anguished telephone calls. There is nothing for Jack Bauer and his loyal band of techies to investigate.

However true that is, the scenario says mere not knowing would inspire panic. So-and-So left his office and never came back. Is he in the Twilight Zone? What would happen were I to go up into the hills to inspect? The famous quote from Alexander Solzhenitsyn would not apply. There would be no bloody corpses, no heads beaten in beneath the stairs. It would be something even more terrifying, more eerie: nothing. It could disrupt the smooth functioning of government, but there would be nothing for the government to attack.

Of course, all of this is mere chatter, just one of the crazy ideas floating in the ether, blowin’ in the wind. Let us devoutly hope it turns out to be nothing.

[Announcement: Alan Stang's radio show, The Sting of Stang, airs from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. Central, M-F, via Republic Broadcasting Network. Call him on the air at (800) 313-9443. To listen, go to republicbroadcasting.org and click on Listen Live. If you can't listen at that time, do so via the archives. I'll be talking about the various manifestations of the conspiracy for world government, its tactics, such as the illegal alien invasion, its purposes and its players, from Jorge W. Boosh on down.]

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: echo5sierra (#0)

The famous quote from Alexander Solzhenitsyn would not apply.

which quote is Alan referring to?

The smooth criminal transition from Bush/Cheney to Obama

christine  posted on  2009-05-03   21:02:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: echo5sierra (#0)

Lee said after Appomattox that had he known what he confronted soon enough, he would have fought to the last man.

"And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?"
-- Alexander Solzhenitsyn

Both men soon realized the folly of their quarter and surrender to the enemy. Learn from history.

Law Enforcement Against Prohibition

IndieTX  posted on  2009-05-03   21:20:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: christine (#1)

American Gulag... Coming Soon
By Alan Stang
6-21-5

It was Alexander Solzhenitsyn, the Russian writer, who made the "gulag archipelago" part of our language. He won the Nobel Prize for the book of that name, lived here in exile and was mentioned in the media almost every day until he made the fateful speech at Harvard, one of many universities founded to spread word of Jesus Christ.

On June 8th, 1978, Solzhenitsyn told a Harvard audience that "convergence" of the Soviet and American systems was doomed. "Convergence" has of course been one of the main purposes of the conspiracy for world government since the beginning. While he spoke, it was well under way.

Solzhenitsyn also made these telling comments: "As humanism in its development became more and more materialistic, it made itself increasingly accessible to speculation and manipulation at first by socialism and then by communism. So that Karl Marx was able to say in 1844 that communism is naturalized humanism.," Humanism is of course the official government religion of this country. Maybe he didn't know that.

He concluded as follows: "There is a disaster, however, which has already been under way for quite some time. I am referring to the calamity of a despiritualized and irreligious humanistic consciousness. . . . To such consciousness, man is the touchstone in judging and evaluating everything on earth. Imperfect man, who is never free of pride, self-interest, envy, vanity, and dozens of other defects. We . . . have lost the concept of a Supreme Complete Entity which used to restrain our passions and our irresponsibility. We have placed too much hope in political and social reforms, only to find out that we were being deprived of our most precious possession: our spiritual life."

With these remarks, Alexander Solzhenitsyn was confronting and exposing the insane Communist monsters who have usurped control of this country. Before that speech, the Communist media had made him an international celebrity, perhaps because the conspiracy for world government found his revelations about the horrors of the gulag temporarily useful. After that speech, he disappeared from public consciousness like a comet. Today, few Americans can remember his name.

What did Solzhenitsyn say about the gulag? "At what exact point, then, should one resist? When one's belt is taken away. When one is ordered to face into a corner? When one crosses the threshold of one's home? . . . ." The same questions that are bothering you now. Solzhenitsyn bitterly laments the Russian failure to resist:

"And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? . . ."

Apparently, they had no guns. Solzhenitsyn does not mention them. But he believes that axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else they had, could have done the job. He continues:

". . . After all, you knew ahead of time that those bluecaps were out at night for no good purpose. And you could be sure ahead of time that you,d be cracking the skull of a cutthroat. Or what about the Black Maria sitting out there on the street with one lonely chauffeur"what if it had been driven off or its tires spiked? The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!"

One is reminded of "Death Wish," starring the late Charles Bronson. The architect hero was not a terrorist, i.e., he did not kill indiscriminately. He did not kill the innocent. He was mild, even harmless, until the guilty attacked. Then, he brought out the hog leg and went to work. Whenever he did so, the theater audience cheered. Acting alone, he turned New York on its ear. Other inmates, inspired, began to do the same. Criminals were indignant. Didn't these New Yorkers know that packing heat was illegal? Crime fell. Imagine the effect of an epidemic of Bronsons.

That is what Russians should have done, says Solzhenitsyn. Of course, they didn't do it. They "burned in the camps later" lamenting that fact: "If . . . if . . . We didn't love freedom enough. And even more - we had no awareness of the real situation. . . . We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward."

They lost everything because they were too cowardly to act, because they didn't love freedom enough. Of course, they were Russians, not Americans. Instead of SWAT and IRS CID, they had Organs. For centuries, they had lived under tyranny, benevolent or otherwise. They were emerging from that tyranny when the Communists perpetrated their coup by seizing a few buildings in Petrograd. They didn't know what Communism was. They could not look back at what the Communists had done.

They did not have the benefit of more than two centuries of liberty. They did not have the untrammeled American spirit. They did not have thousands of retired Marine Corps snipers who still can stick it in your eye, and other thousands of retired Screaming Eagles who still can bring death from the sky. They did not have the guns. They did not have the .50 caliber rifle. They were not Americans. They had not stood with Stonewall Jackson.

What kind of resistance is Solzhenitsyn talking about? He is clearly not talking about a military unit, not even about a militia or any group at all. He is talking about what we might call leaderless, unorganized resistance, what later in the century, in Vietnam, Americans called "targets of opportunity," the people acting individually, their acts adding up to a devastating whole, a "life wish." There would have been nothing to infiltrate and no leader to kill.

By then, the Russian people had the moral right to do whatever they could get away with, like the German people under Hitler, like anyone living under a totalitarian dictatorship. The dictators had cancelled the law, which is a contractual agreement, so the people who had been defrauded no longer were required to perform. If you sign a contract to buy a house, and the owner refuses to vacate, you don't need to make payments.

Of course, nothing I have said so far has any application here. Not at all. In fact, do not"do not"do not even contemplate doing what Solzhenitsyn says he and his fellow Russians should have done. After all, have not our Communist media utterly discredited him? I recall it simply because I am a history buff and it is interesting history. This is nothing more than a book review.

Certainly, I am not suggesting anything. It would be presumptuous to tell you what to do. Your own principles and circumstances will guide you. As Frank "The Chairman" Sinatra, warbled, "I did it my way!" And to paraphrase the liberaloid mantra, "If it feels right, do it."

A word should be said about Romans 13. For many years, pulpit pansies in the pay of the powers that would like to be have preached that Romans 13 teaches unconditional obedience to government. Whatever government does, according to this teaching, we have to endure it, because God has installed government for good.

Yes, He has, but since the men who run government are men, the chance is great that they will go bad. That is why God did the job Himself, through His judges, until His children demanded a king. Through Samuel, He warned them what a king would do. He would eat out their substance, etc. When stiff-necked Israelites would not yield, He gave them Saul. Guess what? God was"is"right. Scripture is full of cases of government run amok. When that happens, God sends someone to overthrow it.

King Jabin, the government, was oppressing the people. Jael lulled Sisera, his commanding general, to sleep and then nailed that old boy to the ground with a spike through his temples. Scripture says Jael is "blessed above women." The children of Israel sang about her in celebration of her exploit.

Eglon, king of Moab, oppressed the people. Ehud parked a knife in his belly. His majesty was so fat his belly closed around the knife, so that for a while the coroner couldn't find the cause of death until crime scene investigators showed him the weapon. Scripture says Ehud was a deliverer whom the Lord had raised up.

Wasn't Paul a notorious jailbird? Wasn't Peter? Wasn't Jesus a criminal? He must have been, according to today's pansy preachers, because the government"the Sanhedrin and the Romans"said He was. Didn't He destroy property and use violence when He kicked the moneychangers out? Didn't He break the law Himself?

If you preach that the government can do no wrong and must be obeyed blindly whatever it does, that is where you must wind up. Romans 13 means that you must obey and defer to government as long as it does what God installed it to do. When government stops doing what God installed it to do"stops clearly and incontrovertibly"your obedience is no longer required. Weren't our Founding Fathers criminals?

Is God a Nazi? That is the question. If you subscribe to the preaching of today's pansy preachers, you believe He is. You believe you must obey Hitler because he is the government. You believe you must defer to whatever crimes the government commits because of what some pansy preacher says about Romans 13.

So you see, pal, the fact that you may put your collar on backward or have three first names, etc., cuts you no slack here. And by the way, those pansy preachers revere Martin Luther King, Jr. Wasn't King in the Birmingham jail when he wrote his famous letter from Birmingham jail (if he wrote it)?

Wasn't he there because he defied the government? Which governments does Romans 13 say we must obey? Regular readers will also remember that today's Christianity has been infiltrated from top to bottom by Communists, starting even before World War II. Could that be the reason today's pansy preachers pervert Romans 13? Are they deliberately trying to neutralize the faithful?

The gulag is coming, tovarish. What will you do? ===

"Published originally at EtherZone.com : republication allowed with this notice and hyperlink intact."

Alan Stang has been a network radio talk show host and was one of Mike Wallace's first writers. He was a senior writer for American Opinion magazine and has lectured around the world for more than 30 years. He is also the author of ten books. Go to www.stangbooks.com to read about Alan Stang's blockbuster new novel, He, about the greatest hero of all time, Jesus Christ.

If you would like him to address your group, please email what you have in mind. He is a regular columnist for Ether Zone.

Alan Stang can be reached at:feedback@stangbooks.com We invite you to visit his website at:www.stangbooks.com

Published in the June 17, 2005 issue of Ether Zone. Copyright © 1997 - 2005 Ether Zone. http://www.etherzone.com/2005/stang061705.shtml

Law Enforcement Against Prohibition

IndieTX  posted on  2009-05-03   21:22:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: redpanther (#3)

ping

Law Enforcement Against Prohibition

IndieTX  posted on  2009-05-03   21:23:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: christine (#1)

which quote is Alan referring to?

I think it's one in which govenment functionaries wondered whether they would be able (alive) to return home to their families at the end of a work day...after a day of oppressing the common folk...

"The 'uniter' has brought the entire world together - to despise and deride us." lodwick

Bub  posted on  2009-05-03   21:23:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: IndieTX (#2)

thank you. i have not read his book, but i have read that quote before.

The smooth criminal transition from Bush/Cheney to Obama

christine  posted on  2009-05-03   21:24:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: IndieTX, christine (#3)

Well done, Indie.

Deasy  posted on  2009-05-03   21:31:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: IndieTX, ehco5sierra (#3)

outstanding Stang!

They did not have the benefit of more than two centuries of liberty. They did not have the untrammeled American spirit. They did not have thousands of retired Marine Corps snipers who still can stick it in your eye, and other thousands of retired Screaming Eagles who still can bring death from the sky. They did not have the guns. They did not have the .50 caliber rifle. They were not Americans. They had not stood with Stonewall Jackson.

one can only hope that there is still untrammeled American spirit.

The smooth criminal transition from Bush/Cheney to Obama

christine  posted on  2009-05-03   21:31:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: christine (#8)

one can only hope that there is still untrammeled American spirit.

If you had been at the Lexington Green on April 19th, you would have seen that spirit. It is alive and well, hovering in the trees, waiting for the right time.

echo5sierra  posted on  2009-05-03   21:45:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: echo5sierra (#9)

You were there? Tell us more about it.

Deasy  posted on  2009-05-03   21:48:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Deasy (#10)

It was as close as I could think of to standing on hallowed ground. Standing on the green, raising your right hand and linking yourself inexorably to the men who died on that piece of land was overpowering. It felt real and pure, so different from the compromises of daily life. I feel like I am being eaten by piranhas sometimes, and that weekend was a call from the past of pure principles and uncompromising behavior.

In Braveheart, Robert the Bruce envies William Wallace's ability to lead and not compromise. His father derides Wallace's pure appeal. I felt like Robert The Bruce, wishing we could lead with the pure uncompromising light that those eight men exhibited when they gave their lives for freedom. They showed the most powerful army in the world that they were not invincible, and that the common man could shake his guns in the tyrant's face.

Simply put, I felt a strong connection to the past, to our roots, to where we came from. I felt powerful, and emboldened to stand in the face of the enemy.

I felt like a free man.

echo5sierra  posted on  2009-05-03   23:12:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: echo5sierra, HOUNDDAWG, christine (#11)

Post of the year. Did you read my essay on the Overmountain Men?

Deasy  posted on  2009-05-03   23:19:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: echo5sierra (#11)

how many people were there?

The smooth criminal transition from Bush/Cheney to Obama

christine  posted on  2009-05-03   23:24:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: christine (#13)

how many people were there?

There were about 500 people there. If you look at the oath keepers site, you will see the picture of two Marines in Oath keepers shirts. I am the left half of the mystery Marine duo, but my face is blotted out.

echo5sierra  posted on  2009-05-04   0:57:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: echo5sierra (#14)

If you look at the oath keepers site

have you a link?

The smooth criminal transition from Bush/Cheney to Obama

christine  posted on  2009-05-04   11:47:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: christine (#15)

have you a link?

http://www.oath-keepers.net

http://www.oathkeepers.blogspot.com

echo5sierra  posted on  2009-05-04   22:11:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]