See other History Articles
Title: Who really orchestrated the OKC bombing?
Source:
judicial-inc.biz
URL Source: http://judicial-inc.biz/Oklahoma_City_Bomb.htm
Published: May 7, 2009
Author: judicial-inc.biz
Post Date: 2009-05-07 16:22:39 by Itistoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 1349
Comments: 15
judicial-inc.biz/Oklahoma_City_Bomb.htm Whose M.O. is this, and who benefits?
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 15.
#7. To: Itistoolate (#0)
BTW, I do realize that Waco occured prior to the OKC bombing, it's just that the bombing was an extension of the insanity prevalent in the rush to bring about sweeping changes in federal police power. Waco was a symptom rather than a cause or an effect. In fact, the government insists that McVeigh mentioned he did what he did BECAUSE of Waco. How convenient, where not only does it give them "reason" to "investigate" militias and those who are (or were) vocal about the Waco Massacre, but it causes people to distrust anyone who sees Waco as an act of tyranny, rather than the end result of a crazed cult leader. It's obvious that there were cutting charges and multiple explosive devices in the OKC building from witness reports and forensic evidence. The fact that those facts have been covered up, and those who had first hand knowledge of those facts have been brutally murdered, indicates who was REALLY behind the bombing.
Yup. I don't believe that a home made ANFO bomb could sit in a parked and moving truck for hours without the fuel oil and the fertilizer separating, and if it detonated at all the yield would have been unsatisfactory for any task other than blowing a stump directly beneath it. The apparent acceptance of that fairie tale, that a low velocity ANFO bomb could bring down the facade, never mind those rear columns is a testament to the collective stupidity and/or cowardice of the "sit on mah ass and wait for mah check" American people. I'd bet that it would take many tons of TNT to destroy the building from that distance, and without tamping the charges to direct the blast. And they never explained how columns in row C and row A could be cut without damaging those in row B. Their answer? "Uh, *the General is an unAmerican kook!" _________________________ *the General being Brigadier General Benton K. Partin, U. S. Air Force, retired, an expert in reflective wave technology. In order to try and make a monkey out of him they set up a simulation, and all they had to do was A) change to higher grade explosives and B) eliminate the truck the second time so the axle wouldn't wind up in the crater twice thereby proving that something stinks with the govt story, and C) not have a bldg in the way when they damaged a few columns with their simulation. The funniest part was that the simulation was conducted by a demolitions expert who would be out of business and have to leave the country to get work if he didn't deliver the desired visual effect for the dummies. A truly objective scientific experiment would have been conducted by a Canadian or some other expert who isn't completely dependent on a license or funding or contracts from the US Govt, it would have involved a Ryder truck and an ANFO bomb that was pre-mixed by hand and had ample time to separate. Of course they couldn't risk a bomb not detonating at all, and they sure couldn't risk that happening more than once! They had sensors monitoring the shock wave to the columns on the first blast with a truck, and they claim that the computer was damaged and no readings were measured. Well, I call bullshit on that. They claimed that to avoid revealing the very low blast force they measured when a truck body and a freshly mixed ANFO bomb were detonated. So, that warranted the upgrade of the explosive to a commercial grade that was guaranteed to detonate and produce much greater force, removal of the truck to maximize the blast and produce enough pressure to impress the audience of GED grads with no scientific clue, and to remove the possibility of the axle staying behind in the crater again which it did not do in the OKC blast. (Would any surprise anyone that a low yield farm bomb doesn't produce enough pressure to launch a heavy truck differential and axle into space? And, if that happened twice on camera who would have credibility, them or the General?) So, they hired a dutiful lackey to substitute ingredients and eliminate problematical factors in order to perfect a bomb of that type instead of duplicating the OKC explosion, and they proved that they'll lie about anything as often as needed for as long as necessary to maintain plausible deniability in the weak, pliable minds of people who are no longer educated well enough to see the obvious deception. Those who would mock the scientific method when such a horrible crime has been committed are just goddam evil. And, that's something else the people are just too damned stupid to see.
you could be talking about 911.
There are no replies to Comment # 15. End Trace Mode for Comment # 15.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#8. To: FormerLurker (#7)
It's obvious that there were cutting charges and multiple explosive devices in the OKC building from witness reports and forensic evidence. The fact that those facts have been covered up, and those who had first hand knowledge of those facts have been brutally murdered, indicates who was REALLY behind the bombing.
#15. To: HOUNDDAWG (#8)
Replies to Comment # 15.