[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

1963 Chrysler Turbine

3I/ATLAS is Beginning to Reveal What it Truly Is

Deep Intel on the Damning New F-35 Report

CONFIRMED “A 757 did NOT hit the Pentagon on 9/11” says Military witnesses on the scene

NEW: Armed man detained at site of Kirk memorial: Report

$200 Silver Is "VERY ATTAINABLE In Coming Rush" Here's Why - Mike Maloney

Trump’s Project 2025 and Big Tech could put 30% of jobs at risk by 2030

Brigitte Macron is going all the way to a U.S. court to prove she’s actually a woman

China's 'Rocket Artillery 360 Mile Range 990 Pound Warhead

FED's $3.5 Billion Gold Margin Call

France Riots: Battle On Streets Of Paris Intensifies After Macron’s New Move Sparks Renewed Violence

Saudi Arabia Pakistan Defence pact agreement explained | Geopolitical Analysis

Fooling Us Badly With Psyops

The Nobel Prize That Proved Einstein Wrong

Put Castor Oil Here Before Bed – The Results After 7 Days Are Shocking

Sounds Like They're Trying to Get Ghislaine Maxwell out of Prison

Mississippi declared a public health emergency over its infant mortality rate (guess why)

Andy Ngo: ANTIFA is a terrorist organization & Trump will need a lot of help to stop them

America Is Reaching A Boiling Point

The Pandemic Of Fake Psychiatric Diagnoses

This Is How People Actually Use ChatGPT, According To New Research

Texas Man Arrested for Threatening NYC's Mamdani

Man puts down ABC's The View on air

Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka

My Answer To a Liberal Professor. We both See Collapse But..

Cash Jordan: “Set Them Free”... Mob STORMS ICE HQ, Gets CRUSHED By ‘Deportation Battalion’’

Call The Exterminator: Signs Demanding Violence Against Republicans Posted In DC

Crazy Conspiracy Theorist Asks Questions About Vaccines

New owner of CBS coordinated with former Israeli military chief to counter the country's critics,

BEST VIDEO - Questions Concerning Charlie Kirk,


War, War, War
See other War, War, War Articles

Title: WHY WE FIGHT U.S. Troops Die For Rapists
Source: Uexpress
URL Source: http://www.uexpress.com/tedrall/?uc_full_date=20090507
Published: May 7, 2009
Author: Ted Rall
Post Date: 2009-05-07 20:05:04 by bush_is_a_moonie
Keywords: None
Views: 744
Comments: 27

American soldiers serving in Vietnam wondered what they were fighting for. U.S. troops in Afghanistan don't have that problem. They know exactly what they're fighting for: rapists.

After President Obama's coming "Afghan surge" there will be 72,000 soldiers in Afghanistan. Their primary mission is to prevent Afghans from overthrowing the unpopular regime of Hamid Karzai, the former oil consultant installed by George W. Bush when the U.S. occupation began nearly eight years ago.

America's media repeatedly claimed that Afghan women would be better off under the U.S.-supported Northern Alliance puppet government headed by Karzai than under the Taliban. But when I went to Afghanistan and asked women what they thought, they had a different story. The defeat of the Taliban brought about the collapse of law and order, making life even more dangerous, especially for women. "Under the Taliban," a woman told me, "I watched rapists being executed. Now I see them in the government."

The Afghan women's rights group RAWA has repeatedly told anyone willing to listen that there hasn't been much improvement for women and girls since the U.S. occupation began in 2001. But no one--least of all left-of-center Americans eager to embrace the Afghan war--has wanted to hear what they had to say. "Most women still wear the all-encompassing burqa through fear of attack and social pressure, a third of women in Kabul do not leave the house, forbidden from doing so by the male members of the family, and it is still almost impossible for women to get a divorce," reported The Sunday Herald in 2005.

Liberal Democrats who cling to Afghanistan as "the good war" the U.S. should be fighting are being forced to confront the ugly truth about their ally. Karzai has signed a law that states that "women cannot leave the house without their husbands' permission, that they can only seek work, education or visit the doctor with their husbands' permission, and that they cannot refuse their husband sex," reported the British newspaper The Guardian on March 31st.

The Shiite Personal Status act applies only to devotees of the Shia branch of Islam, which account for between 10 and 20 percent of the population. How can a secular democratic state have different laws depending on a citizen's faith? The answer is: It can't. Afghanistan isn't secular or democratic. The "new" Afghanistan's constitution is based on Sharia law--exactly as it was under the Taliban. But the U.S. media has purposefully failed to report the icky truth about our ally.

The new law requires women to have sex with their husbands at least once every four days unless they are sick or menstruating. "Obedience, readiness for intercourse and not leaving the house without the permission of the husband are the duties of the wife," reads the law of a nation ostensibly invaded by U.S. troops in part to liberate Afghan women. "As long as the husband is not traveling, he has the right to have sexual intercourse with his wife every fourth night," it says.

Afghan Senator Humaira Namati calls the rape bill "worse than during the Taliban" and said it was rammed through parliament without debate. "Anyone who spoke out was accused of being against Islam," she said. Several hundred women protesting the law on the streets of Kabul were viciously assaulted by men as police stood back and watched.

In fairness to the responsible male legislators, they did add a provision to protect Shiite women from "dead bed": Afghan men have to put out "at least once every four months."

Karzai signed legalized rape into law in order to appease right-wing legislators in an election year. After international criticism, however, he began backpedaling with the lamest of all possible reasons: he didn't read the bill before he was for it.

"I was not aware of what I had signed," Afghan parliamentarian Sabrina Saqib said Karzai told her. The legislation "has so many articles," Karzai told CNN. "Now I have instructed, in consultation with clergy of the country, that the law be revised and any article that is not in keeping with the Afghan constitution and Islamic Sharia must be removed from this law."

As Karzai BSes for the cameras, hundreds of Afghan women languish in prisons around the country. Their crime? They're teen brides, some as young as 10, who ran away from much older husbands who purchased them. "In President Hamid Karzai's Afghanistan, women are still imprisoned for running away from home," reports The Sunday Herald.

Nice theocracy you got there, Mullah Karzai.

Remember this column the next time you watch a flag-draped coffin returning from Afghanistan. The young man inside that box didn't die for nothing. He died to protect rapists.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 23.

#12. To: bush_is_a_moonie (#0)

It doesn't matter. We will lose. The taliban will win. No one in recent history has ever taken that country. There is a reason for that. That reason is: they dont know the meaning of the word "quit". They will fight until we are either gone, or everyone is dead. I look for many more coffins arriving at Dover.

.

PSUSA  posted on  2009-05-08   10:04:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: PSUSA (#12)

I look for many more coffins arriving at Dover.

Gee, I know this will sound harsh, but about those coffins arriving at Dover? The more that arrive the quicker the stream of out of work "volunteers" will dry up, thus decreasing the expansion of the American empire. So, put me in the column of not giving a siht about how many come back feet first.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2009-05-08   10:11:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Jethro Tull (#13)

I dont consider that to be harsh.

I don't care either, and I make no bones about it. Pun not intended. We only murdered over a million of them in Afghanistan and Iraq, so excuse me if I dont shed any tears when the payback comes. "Our" soldiers are idiots at best, voluntary murderers at worst.

I also look for Iraq to heat up again. They are probably sitting back, biding their time, organizing, rearming, training, waiting for the best opportunity to strike, when we start pulling out. Then they'll hit "us".

.

PSUSA  posted on  2009-05-08   10:41:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: PSUSA (#14)

We only murdered over a million of them in Afghanistan and Iraq, so excuse me if I dont shed any tears when the payback comes. "Our" soldiers are idiots at best, voluntary murderers at worst.

I can understand why you feel that way, but think about it. How many of our soldiers are over there not because they wanted to be mercenaries for this rotten empire, but because they simply wanted to make a living of some kind, any kind? How many of our soldiers are over there because their only choice was to either join the military or end up homeless and living on the streets?

It's not right that we've done so much damage to the rest of the world. But our soldiers don't deserve the brunt of the retaliation against our empire. The oligarchs who own this empire deserve it, but they'll never experience it. Some poor bastard from Nowhereville, USA who couldn't find a job of any kind to save his life will be the one to suffer. And then when they come home in a box, their family will suffer too. And for what? The unbridled greed and arrogance of the oligarchs.

It's a truly miserable situation, to my mind this is the kind of crap that eventually results in a popular uprising and revolution. It's a pattern that has played out many times before. Sure, the oligarchs have much more control and power and ability to suppress popular rage than they did a hundred years ago, but that only serves to build up the pressure before the final revolt. Right now it sucks to be us. Mark my words, the day will come when it will REALLY suck to be them...

Elliott Jackalope  posted on  2009-05-08   17:56:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Elliott Jackalope (#18)

We don't see eye to eye on this one.

I dont excuse this because someone needed a job. There's no difference between this and someone that chooses to be a mafia hitman or a freelance murderer for hire. There's good money in that too.

But giving them the benefit of the doubt, the people that enlisted didn't do their homework. .

PSUSA  posted on  2009-05-08   18:26:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: PSUSA (#19)

But giving them the benefit of the doubt, the people that enlisted didn't do their homework. .

It's not usually reasonable to expect them to have done so.

Youth isn't wasted on the young; they need it to survive their stupidity.

Many moons ago I almost joined out of (what I now know was misguided) a sense of patriotism. My folks talked me out of it, which was their job, and for which I am thankful.

Prefrontal Vortex  posted on  2009-05-10   8:58:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 23.

#24. To: Prefrontal Vortex (#23)

It's not usually reasonable to expect them to have done so.

This is true. Perhaps I was too harsh on them. I was young and dumb too.

I remember back then that I thought war was "cool". I loved war movies. Especially ones involving fighter planes. Even now I could probably ID any fighter past or present except for WW1. It took a while until I realized that it wasn't a video game, 3 lives for a quarter.

Your parents may have saved your life.

.

PSUSA  posted on  2009-05-10 09:46:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 23.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]