Scottie Pippen includes 5-year-old in lawsuit, claims she vandalized mansion with crayons

Source: https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nba/scottie-pippen-includes-5-year-old-in-lawsuit-claims-she-vandalized-mansion-with-crayons/ar-AACcJz3?ocid=spartanntp
Published: May 31, 2019
Author: Jason Owens
Post Date: 2019-06-01 10:34:22 by BTP Holdings
Views: 43

Scottie Pippen includes 5-year-old in lawsuit, claims she vandalized mansion with crayons

Jason Owens 17 hrs ago

© Provided by Oath Inc. Scottie Pippen has named a five-year-old girl in a lawsuit claiming she damaged his house with crayons, (Getty)

Last year, NBA Hall of Famer Scottie Pippen sued a couple who rented his South Florida mansion, claiming they caused $110,000 in damage while renting it.

Now he’s added their five-year-old daughter to the legal fight, claiming the child defaced the Fort Lauderdale home with crayons and markers.

The defendants in the lawsuit are comedian Lindsay Glazer Woloshin, aka The Alphabitch, and her husband Jacob Woloshin. Lindsay is also an attorney.

Pippen cites animal urine, stolen utensils in suit

According to the lawsuit, the couple allowed pets to urinate inside the house, damaged countless cabinets and drawers, stole utensils and missed payments on the house they agreed to rent for $30,000 a month when they moved in after their home was damaged by Hurricane Irma.

An update to the lawsuit obtained by the Miami Herald shows that Pippen has now named the daughter in the case and faulted the couple for their “failure as parents.”

Damage via “markers, crayons”

From the lawsuit:

47. At all times material hereto, Defendants Woloshin and Glazer were both the natural and custodial parents of their minor child, D.M.

48. At all times material hereto, Woloshin and Glazer were charged with custody over D.M., and relatedly, responsibility for her conduct.

49. While Defendants were tenants in the Property, they permitted D.M. to deface certain elements of the Property with markers, crayons and/ or cause damage of similar nature.

50. As a direct and proximate result of property damage, and Defendants failure as parents, Plaintiff was damaged in the nature of repair costs.

Click for Full Text!


Poster Comment:

Too much for words.

Post Comment   Private Reply