The only good thing I can say about Trump’s foreign policy is that he hasn’t started another huge ass war for Jews yet.

zion don will have his war no matter how many die.

zion don will have his war no matter how many die.

You really think so fool?

Trump is, in fact, trying to END the war in Afghanistan. But he says Taliban is hard to deal with.

He got rid of the war hawk John Bolton and that bodes well for not starting a war with Iran. That was Bolton's number one priority since he is an Uber-Neocon and wanted to start a war with Iran to benefit Israel. ;)

Well, you're citing Infostormer -- excellent! I go it one better by never listening to their BS. Get this -- the other Stormer wisely says it's not going to bother handling the "Biden/Trump/Ukraine/Impeachment Story" because of its horrible banality and inanity:

dailystormer.name/daily-s...ement-on-future-coverage- of-the-biden-trump-ukraine-impeachment-story/

Trump also said some things about Venezuela being evil or whatever.

WATCH: President Trump Is The First U.S. President To Address Religious Freedom at U.N. - YouTube, 16.25 minutes | Published on Sep 23, 2019 by FOX 10 Phoenix

Notes: Iran, Iraq: Iran backed militias, China, South America: Nicaragua and Venezuela - religious persecution accusations; funds - freedom of religion, religious freedom, religious liberty

President of Colombia: We've had 'immigration shock' from Venezuela - YouTube, 11.25 minutes | Published on Sep 24, 2019 by Fox Business

President of Colombia Ivan Duque discusses immigration policy, Venezuela [Notes: 1.4 million Venezuelans fleeing impoverishment and Maduro "dictatorship" - allegedly "sponsoring" and "harboring terrorists" there ; @ 1:54, "the Inter-American Treaty of Reciprocal Assistance that was voted yesterday"]

Reminder: America does not have unlimited Asylum/Refugee capacity. Those numbers are supposed to be a portion of our total legal immigration per year, set by law -- not in addition to that legislated maximum total. Rather than the UN and our State Department being tasked with investigating various allegations of government persecution to approve or deny asylum/refuge applications on an individual basis, this is likely to go in the direction of auto-approving every claim of fleeing religious persecution (even flase claims) from whatever accused countries have been listed as persecutors of religion(s). Military actions of humanitarian intervention in those countries might possibly be implemented after a certain number of claims have been registered, even if all of the accumulated claims are false.

In the UN address (at 6:56 and 11:56), 80% of the world is said to be suffering loss of religious freedom from state-sponsored persecution, terrorists and criminals -- which indicates that the standard of persecutorial governement for asylum/refuge claims is being expanded to include charges against others as religious persecutors (those who would be considered either criminal or terrorist persecutors of religion but not as part of the nation's government or sponsored by it). At 12:04, President Trump says: "No matter the case, America will always be a voice for victims of religious persecution everywhere. No matter where you go, you have a place in the United States of America."

I think he means well but America and Europe combined just don't have the means to shelter and sustain mass influxes of arrivals 24/7/365 from 80% of the world's countries. This sounded almost like a promo-speech for the UN's Global Migration Pact (that America didn't agree to sign), as if it was influentially produced by Open Borders Agendists. Supportive opinions for Israel's border wall as a necessary Defense would probably be increased worldwide by this announcemnt but America's border wall would probably be denigrated henceforth as an "immorality" much more than it has been already. Instead of making America more vulnerable to Asylum-shopping fraud, all America actually needed to do more responsibly is affirm that it would thoroughly investigate the veracity of every persecution claim, call for the UN to do that also, and audit the accused nations to suspend, reduce, or cancel the foreign aid America sends them but they shouldn't get if the persecutorial government charges are true. If they aren't using the foreign aid to adequately police religious persecution criminals and terrorizers and to provide more domestic violence shelters in the country if needed, they should have to account for every penny of the foreign aid they spent elsewhere.

loss of religious freedom from state-sponsored persecution

This has been going on for a very long time. At least since the Puritans fled England because of religious persecution there.

There could be other incidents that I am not familiar with or which the meningitis has caused me to lose the memory of them. ;)

He got rid of the war hawk John Bolton and that bodes well for not starting a war with Iran. That was Bolton's number one priority since he is an Uber-Neocon and wanted to start a war with Iran to benefit Israel. ;)

you are the biggest fool of all, zion don replaces zion bolton with a zion jew.

loss of religious freedom from state-sponsored persecution

This has been going on for a very long time. At least since the Puritans fled England because of religious persecution there.

There could be other incidents that I am not familiar with or which the meningitis has caused me to lose the memory of them. ;)

Cui bono now? The UN has turned it into a world scale profiteering enterprise. Claims against "favored nations" would likely tend to get overlooked and the veracity of claims against lesser valued nations would likely tend to be rubber stamped as valid.

Cui bono now? The UN has turned it into a world scale profiteering enterprise. Claims against "favored nations" would likely tend to get overlooked and the veracity of claims against lesser valued nations would likely tend to be rubber stamped as valid.

Touché. Indeed the U.N. has turned into a for profit enterprise. Most "favored nations" just might end up with the short end of the stick. ;)

Most "favored nations" just might end up with the short end of the stick. ;)

Nations of the West would probably be expected to "do more" to settle the allegedly presecuted there and "poorer countries" exempted from doing anything but providing the UN & Comrades with a steady flow of "asylum seekers".