What is it like to live in a society where you are so afraid you have to carry around a loaded gun?

Source: https://www.quora.com/
Published: Jun 25, 2019
Author: Douglas Lockhart and Charles Reed
Post Date: 2019-10-26 15:59:43 by BTP Holdings
Views: 418

What is it like to live in a society where you are so afraid you have to carry around a loaded gun?

Douglas Lockhart, Cyber Security Analyst (2018-present)
Updated Jun 25 · Upvoted by Christopher Siano, 30+ years as a firearms instructor. and Charles Reed, 45 years working on firearms.

Allow me to answer with a little story: A Connecticut State Police Trooper pulled over an old 1955 Cadillac for a faulty taillight. When the officer approached the car, he noticed a little old lady behind the wheel.

The police officer asked the old lady for her license, registration, and insurance cards; however, when she opened up her pocketbook to retrieve those cards, to his surprise he noticed a concealed weapon carry permit.

The trooper took all the documents, looked them over and said. "Mrs. Smith, I see you have a concealed weapon permit. Do you have a gun with you?"

Very sweetly and proudly the little old lady replied, " oh, yes officer, I have a Smith & Wesson 38 caliber pistol right here in my bag. Do you wish to see it?" And before he could reply, the old lady opened her handbag under his nose and sure enough, he immediately recognized the distinctive snub barrel of a Smith & Wesson 38.

Kind of taken aback, as a matter of formality he cautiously asked her, "do you have any other guns with you?"

To which the old lady boasted, " I also have a 357 magnum in my glove compartment", opening its cover and revealing its huge barrel.

The officer, flabbergasted, found himself then asking before any further thought on his part, but not really expecting anything more: "anything else?"

To which she replied, "why, yes, I also have a 44 magnum in my console, and a Mossberg 500 12 gauge shotgun in the trunk."

As you can imagine, at this point the police officer was at a total loss as to why an old lady would have in her possession such an arsenal of weapons, so thinking she was a bit crazy, he bent over, looked her in the eyes, and asked, "Lady, may I ask you what you are afraid of?"

To which the old lady locked eyes with the officer and calmly answered, "Not a damn thing!"

Now, let me ask YOU a question. What’s it like to live in a country where much of the population are so naive, brainwashed and gullible as to believe that their Government can protect them, when only a few moments rational reflection should make it plain that it’s a physical impossibility?

Post Comment   Private Reply

#1: Darkwing    To: BTP Holdings (#0)

I have carried for 25 years. When asked: "are you expecting trouble", I answer: "If I was expecting trouble, I would be carrying my shot gun".

Darkwing posted on 2019-10-27 09:36:16   Reply   Private Reply


#2: Luke The Spook    To: BTP Holdings (#0)

Warren v District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 (D.C. Ct. of Ap. 1981).

Typical of cases enunciating the non-responsibility of the police for protecting individual citizens is Warren v District of Columbia in which three rape victims sued the city and its police department under the following facts: Two of the victims were upstairs when they heard the other being attacked by men who had broken in downstairs. Half an hour having passed and their roommate's screams having ceased, they assumed the police must have arrived in response to their repeated phone calls.

In fact their calls had somehow been lost in the shuffle while the roommate was being beaten into silent acquiesence. So when the roommates went downstairs to see to her, as the court's opinion graphically describes it, "For the next fourteen hours the women were held captive, raped, robbed, beaten, forced to commit sexual acts upon each other, and made to submit to the sexual demands" of their attackers.

Having set out these facts, the court promptly exonerated the District of Columbia and its police, as was clearly required by

[the] fundamental principle of American law that a government and its agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police protection, to any individual citizen.

Luke The Spook posted on 2019-10-27 10:20:16   Reply   Private Reply


#3: Luke The Spook    To: BTP Holdings (#0)

Q. "Why do you carry a gun?"

A. Because a cop's too heavy

Luke The Spook posted on 2019-10-27 10:21:48   Reply   Private Reply


#4: BTP Holdings    To: Luke The Spook (#2)

Having set out these facts, the court promptly exonerated the District of Columbia and its police, as was clearly required by

[the] fundamental principle of American law that a government and its agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police protection, to any individual citizen.

This is very true.

The police have no duty to the individual citizen, only to the public at large. ;)

BTP Holdings posted on 2019-10-27 12:05:40   Reply   Private Reply