Update: Judge Orders Texas Father to Pay $5,000 a Month So His Ex- Wife Can “Transition” Son James Into a Girl Named “Luna”
By Cristina Laila
Published August 13, 2020 at 8:23pm
This is a heartbreaking update.
A Dallas judge this week issued an order allowing Anne Georgulas power over her 8-year-old son James Younger’s medical decisions.
As previously reported, the mother of 8-year-old James wanted to start the boy on puberty blockers and eventually cross-sex hormones.
The boy’s father, Jeffrey Younger vowed to keep fighting to protect his son after a jury last year ruled against him in his court case to save his son James from gender “transition".
The crazed mother, Dr. Anne Georgulas was to continue the chemical castration of their son to transition James Younger into “Luna.”
Dr. Georgulas actually admitted in court that she is not the biological mother of James and his twin brother Jude. She used in- vitro fertilization with a donor egg.
Texas Governor Gregg Abbott announced last fall that the Texas Attorney General’s Office and the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services were looking into the horrific case involving James Younger and his abusive mother who is working to castrate her son.
A video of James Younger when he was only 3 years old surfaced revealing that his mother put dresses on him and painted his fingernails when the child was just an infant!
The abuse from the mother all started because James liked a toy from the movie ‘Frozen’ meant for little girls. It is totally normal for little boys to play with girls toys; it does not mean they want to be castrated and ‘transition’ into a girl.
When asked if he was a boy or a girl, James, then only 3 years old answered, “girl.” He said his mom told him he’s a girl.
Now Jeffrey Younger is being forced to pay his ex-wife $5,000 a month to pay for his son’s “transition” and counseling in addition to a $10,000 retainer required by the counselor.
Judge Mary Brown issued the order without a proper hearing.
Poster Comment:
You must ask this one question, Is this kid living in a bubble and has no contact with other children?
#1: Lod To: BTP Holdings (#0)
Lod posted on 2020-08-15 09:42:45 Reply Private Reply
#2: BTP Holdings To: Lod (#1)
I would think so.
In this case the mother was dressing her son like a girl and telling him he was a girl. So who do you think needs a head shrinker? ;)
BTP Holdings posted on 2020-08-15 10:06:57 Reply Private Reply
#3: Bill D Berger To: BTP Holdings (#0)
So then what right does she have to psychologically screw this kid up for life?
When asked if he was a boy or a girl, James, then only 3 years old answered, “girl.” He said his mom told him he’s a girl.
I'm guessing the "mom" coerced him into saying that.
Now Jeffrey Younger is being forced to pay his ex-wife $5,000 a month to pay for his son’s “transition” and counseling in addition to a $10,000 retainer required by the counselor.
This is bullshit! Why does the father have to pay any of that?
Anytime you have a woman judge in a child custody case they always side with the mother.
Apparently, he's not totally against his son's being a girl...he has said to jut wait until the kid is older, not turn him into a girl at 8 years old.
Where's Gov. Abbot on this?
Bill D Berger posted on 2020-08-15 14:54:35 Reply Private Reply
#4: BTP Holdings To: Bill D Berger, Lod (#3)
Oh, that's right. This is going on in Texas.
Gov. Abbott seems more concerned with convening a new Constitutional Convention. If that were to happen we might end up with a government none of us want or need. :-/
BTP Holdings posted on 2020-08-15 15:04:29 Reply Private Reply
#5: Bill D Berger To: BTP Holdings (#4)
Those are never good. Unless it means Texas is seceding from the Union.
Bill D Berger posted on 2020-08-15 15:09:59 Reply Private Reply
#6: BTP Holdings To: Bill D Berger (#5)
I'm afraid that would be impossible now since the corporate UNITED STATES OF AMERICA supercedes anything the founders ever thought would come to pass in the way of secession.
The individual States are now sub-divisions of the Corporation and are prohibited from secession.
We must remember the original secession in 1861 occurred over States Rights.
Slavery was not an issue until Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, and that only freed slaves in the rebellious states. ;)
BTP Holdings posted on 2020-08-15 15:41:07 Reply Private Reply