I love this image juxtaposition.

Imagine being an Australian and being completely invaded by the Chinese. Like, literally everything in your country is owned by the Chinese, and they’re building colonies inside your country, because your government legalized selling national resources to foreigners.

Then imagine that while you’re being told that it is racist to complain about your country being sold to the Chinese, your government tells you that unlike the Chinese who came to your country, the Chinese who stayed in China are evil, and you have to go to war with them because the United States has decided that they want to force them to do gay anal sex and have child trannies.

Then, also, there will be much more serious campaigns against racism to stop you from complaining about the Chinese in your own country.

Would you think that was all very reasonable?

RT:

The highly-discussed AUKUS pact between Washington, London and Canberra to arm Australia with a fleet of nuclear submarines is “reckless” and will only expose the country to danger on multiple fronts, Aussie trade unions said.

Since its announcement a week ago, the trilateral deal to provide Australia with nuclear-powered, yet conventionally armed, submarines has faced a wave of international condemnation. France, which lost a hefty $66 billion contract for diesel-electric subs with Canberra because of the move, labeled it “a stab in the back” and recalled its ambassadors from Australia and the US. China blamed Washington, London and Canberra for the “Cold War mentality” as AUKUS is widely seen as an attempt to counter Beijing’s growing influence in the Indo-Pacific. Russia warned that the pact may well end up putting “the entire security architecture in Asia” under threat.

Those criticisms sound pretty reasonable…

Click for Full Text!