When I saw this 4,000-word hate screed against pro-Trump and anti-hoax site The Gateway Pundit on the front of Reuters, it brought back memories of when I was constantly in the media, with every single Jew calling for my silencing.
I was of course banned from everything. All the way. I’ve managed to maintain an astonishingly large readership despite this, but they’ve stopped talking about me because there really isn’t any other way to censor me and anything they write about me is likely to be part of a psychological operation I’ve done against them.
But TGP is still sort of not totally banned. I’m not sure about the extent of the censorship against them, but you’re definitely still allowed to share links on Facebook (you can’t even share my links in private messages on Facebook, lol).
But they probably want to shut down TGP completely – just take it offline. They couldn’t do this to me, because my sysop has a Q level clearance. But as we saw with Parler, a major site with millions of dollars from the Mercers wasn’t capable of dealing with an AWS ban.
The Reuters piece is written by Peter Eisler and Jason Szep, both of whom I would assume are Jewish. But TGP won’t say “these Jews are coming for us,” which puts them in a much weaker position. If you start just talking nonstop about Jews, they will sort of back off of you in public, because they really don’t like writing “the site claims that a Jewish conspiracy for which no evidence exists is trying to silence them…” when anyone can look at the byline and see obviously Jewish names.
Then they might accidentally run across an infographic like this:
Basically, the whole censorship media beat has been replaced with non-Jews because so many people were saying “these people are all Jewish.”
Related: Hunt for the Great White Speech Criminal: Glenn Greenwald has Written the Defining Article of 2021
Again, the article is 4,000 words long.
But this is the abstract:
The Gateway Pundit, which started as a tiny opinion blog, saw readership surge to nearly 50 million views a month as it amplified Donald Trump’s false stolen-election claims. Reuters documented the impact: 25 election workers targeted by more than 100 violent threats or hostile messages citing the Pundit.
So the basic claim is that people read the site and get angry and therefore speech that makes people angry shouldn’t be allowed.
That’s the whole story. They just go through and say that people read stories on TGP about politicians and then sent them mean emails.
They actually include emails: