The Siren Song of War

Source: https://original.antiwar.com/rep-john-j-duncan-jr/2025/12/11/the-siren-song-of-war/
Published: 2025-12-13
Author: Horse
Post Date: 2025-12-13 07:43:55 by Horse
Views: 63

by Rep. John J. Duncan, Jr. | Republican 2nd congressional district Tn 

In October of 2002, I shocked many in my Congressional District and beyond by voting against giving President George W. Bush authorization to use military force in Iraq.

The night before that vote, my older sister told me a Knoxville television station had conducted a poll which found that in its viewing area 74 percent were for the war, 9 percent were against, and 17 percent were undecided.

When I pushed the button at about 3:00 the next day to cast that vote, I wondered if I might be ending my political career. My vote was so highly publicized that it was clearly the most unpopular thing I had ever done.

However, after three or four years and much to my amazement, that vote became the most popular of the more than 16,000 I cast during my 30 years in the U.S. House.

Unfortunately, the Authorization to Use Military Force (AUMF) that the Congress passed then is once again relevant because President Trump and his advisers seem to think it gives them authority to go to war in Venezuela without the declaration by Congress called for in our Constitution.

When we went to war in Iraq in 2003, Saddam Hussein’s total military budget was about 2/10 of one percent of ours. Venezuela’s is even less. Neither of those two countries were or are capable of attacking us in any serious way. Neither has even threatened to do so.

Two polls in late November by CBS News/YouGov and Reuters/Ipsos both showed that about 70 percent of the American people were opposed to going to war in Venezuela, and probably most of the other 30 percent did not really want such a war but just did not want to oppose President Trump.

While the overwhelming majority of the American people do not want more dangerous illegal drugs coming into this Country, far more drugs are coming from China and Mexico and various other places. If we take action against Venezuela, which country is next?

Just before we went to war against Iraq, U.S. News & World Report had a story headlined “Why The Rush To War?” We should be asking the same thing today.

I believe it is because most leaders around the world, and especially U. S. Presidents, realize they can’t really control the economy, but they have much more power over foreign policy and gravitate to it. They, their closest advisers, and military leaders seem to feel much more powerful and important if they can be seen as preparing for, threatening or even being involved in some war.

They all want to think of themselves or be seen as modern day Winston Churchills. Remember President Clinton’s Secretary of State, Madeline Albright, who famously said “What’s the point of having this superb military if you can’t use it?”

Too many of our leaders are far too eager to go to war. Some have been so eager they have even lied about it. Presidents Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt both promised in their campaigns of 1916 and 1940 that they would not be sending American boys to fight on foreign battlefields.

And all leaders seem to believe and promise that their wars will be quick and victorious. Remember the promises about the “cakewalk” in Iraq?

They always greatly exaggerate the threats and vastly underestimate the costs. Both Presidents Bush made Saddam Hussein sound like the second coming of Hitler and talked about his “elite” troops. Then those same troops sometimes were shown surrendering to American camera crews or even empty tanks. Netanyahu has been crying for more than 30 years that Iran would have nuclear weapons within months.

In 2002, Lawrence Lindsey, a Harvard Professor who was President Bush’s main economic advisor, told the Wall Street Journal that a war with Iraq would cost $200 billion or more. He was fired a short time later.

When the Administration found that I was one of the very few Republicans who might oppose that war, I was called to the White House and put into a small secure room with then National Security Advisor, Condoleezza Rice, and the Director and Deputy Director of the CIA. Among several questions that I asked that day was how much it would cost.

Dr. Rice said it would cost about 50 or 60 billion, and “we will get some of that back from our allies.” Now, all these very unnecessary wars have cost us many trillions that we did not have. The creation of all this money has caused almost everything to cost about 10 times more than they would have if we had stayed home. Think about pickup trucks that have now reached $100,000 and average size homes that now reach $1,000,000 or more.

And thinking about eagerness to go to war, I doubt we have ever had a Secretary of Defense who has done less in the military but is more eager to use it than Pete Hegseth. He seems to always be trying to prove that he is super jock, macho man, gung-ho patriot, great warrior.

He makes me think about what President Eisenhower, who spent his career in the Army, once told his Chief of Staff, Gen. Andrew Goodpaster: “God help the Nation when it has a President who doesn’t know as much about the military as I do.” (or Secretary of War). quoted in the book “Ike’s Bluff” by Evan Thomas.

Eisenhower also said in a radio address from London sometime after World War II: “I think that people want peace so much that one of these days governments had better get out of the way and let them have it.”

Finally, I wish President Trump would occasionally re-read these great words from his own Inaugural Address: “We will measure our success not only by the battles we win but also by the wars we end, or perhaps more importantly, the wars we never get into.”

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Israel’s Biggest Con Trick: Hiding the True Numbers It Has Killed in Gaza
Israel has penned us all into a 'debate', one entirely divorced from reality, that relates only to those killed directly by its bombs and gunfire – not the genocide it is waging by other means


The biggest con trick Israel has managed to pull off over the past two years is imposing entirely phoney parameters on a “debate” in the West about the credibility of the death toll in Gaza, now officially standing at just over 70,000.

It is not just that we have been endlessly bogged down in rows about whether Gaza’s medical authorities can be trusted, or how many of the dead are Hamas fighters. (Despite Israeli disinformation campaigns, the Israeli military itself believes more than 80 per cent of the dead are civilians.)

Or even that these “debates” always ignore the fact that, early on, Israel wrecked Gaza’s capacity to count its dead by destroying the enclave’s governmental offices and its hospitals. The 70,000 figure is likely to be a drastic under-estimate.

No, the biggest con trick is that Israel has successfully penned us all into a “debate”, one entirely divorced from reality, that relates only to those killed directly by its bombs and gunfire.

The truth is that far, far larger numbers of people in Gaza have been actively killed by Israel not through these direct means but through what statisticians refer to as “indirect” methods.

These people were killed by Israel destroying their homes and leaving them with no shelter. By Israel destroying their water and electricity supplies and their sanitation systems. By Israel levelling their hospitals. By Israel starving them. By Israel creating the perfect conditions for disease to spread. The list of ways Israel is killing people in Gaza goes on and on.

Imagine your own societies levelled in the way Gaza has been.

How long would your elderly parents survive in this hellscape?

How well would your diabetic child fare, or your sister with asthma, or your brother with cancer?

How well would you cope with catching pneumonia, or even a common cold, if you hadn’t had more than one small meal a day for months on end?

https://original.antiwar.com/cook/2025/12/11/israels-biggest-con-trick-hiding-the-true-numbers-it-has-killed-in-gaza/

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Report: Trump To Appoint US General To Lead Gaza International Stabilization Force

by Dave De Camp, antiwar.com

It's unclear if the international force will materialize, as countries are hesitant to participate.

President Trump is planning to appoint a two-star US general to lead the international force that may be deployed to Gaza under the US ceasefire deal, Axios reported on Thursday, a step that would mark a significant escalation of US involvement in the Palestinian territory, which has been destroyed by Israel.

https://news.antiwar.com/2025/12/11/report-trump-to-appoint-us-general-to-lead-gaza-international-stabilization-force/

Post Comment   Private Reply

#1: Horse    To: Horse (#0)

Rising maternal malnutrition in Gaza drives up newborn mortality

 

The number of newborns who died at birth in Gaza has increased by 75 percent, according to new data by the United Nations Children's Fund (Unicef).

Between July and September, an average of 47 baby deaths were recorded each month, almost double the monthly average of 27 in 2022.

Data also showed that in 2022, prior to Israel's genocidal war on Gaza, an average of 250 babies per month – 5 percent – were born underweight. That figure has risen sharply, to roughly 460 low birth-weight babies each month.

Children born underweight (less than 2.5 kilograms) are 20 times more likely to die than those born at a healthy weight.

Data presented by Unicef on Tuesday shows that 38 percent of pregnant women screened were diagnosed with acute malnutrition, with the agency admitting at least 8,300 pregnant and breastfeeding women for treatment in October alone.

Health officials in Gaza have previously warned that Israeli-driven starvation in the besieged enclave is putting pregnant women and their babies at severe risk, with premature births and low birth-weight deliveries on the rise.

UNICEF'S communications manager, Tess Ingram, said most newborns in Gaza are either dying in neonatal intensive care units or surviving only to face malnutrition and potentially "lifelong health complications".

"In Gaza’s hospitals, I met newborn babies weighing less than one kilogram, their tiny chests heaving with effort just to stay alive," Ingram said. 

She described the pattern of malnourished mothers giving birth to underweight or premature babies as "unmistakable".

"This domino effect, from mother to child, should have been prevented," Ingram added, noting that the cycle of suffering "could have been prevented, if international humanitarian law had been respected"

https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/rising-maternal-malnutrition-gaza-drives-up-newborn-mortality

Horse posted on 2025-12-13 07:45:04   Reply   Private Reply


#2: Horse    To: Horse (#1)

Israel preparing largest ever act of archeological cleansing in West Bank

Alon Arad, +972magazine.com

While residents of Sebastia, a Palestinian village north of Nablus in the occupied West Bank, huddled for an emergency meeting to discuss a new Israeli plan to seize significant parts of their village under the pretext of “developing” its archaeological site, Israeli archaeologists gathered in Boston for the 125th annual conference of the American Society of Overseas Research (ASOR).

Formerly the American School of Oriental Research, ASOR replaced the meaning of the letter “O” in its name in 2021 to ostensibly signal a shift away from archaeology’s colonial legacy and toward research based in equal partnership with local populations. For Israeli archaeologists, however, that shift appears largely cosmetic: As they attended the prestigious conference — their main arena for cultivating ties with the global academic community — their government was busy using archaeology as a tool for continued colonial control over Palestinians.

On Nov. 19, Israel’s Civil Administration announced plans to expropriate 550 of Sebastia’s private plots — approximately 1,800 dunams (450 acres) of land that have been central to the village’s livelihood, cultural heritage, and identity for centuries. Residents say the project will devastate local agriculture, including destroying some 3,000 olive trees, some of which are hundreds of years old.

https://www.972mag.com/sebastia-archeological-cleansing-west-bank/

Horse posted on 2025-12-13 07:46:21   Reply   Private Reply