Title: Oops!, BBC was half an hour too early reporting on WTC7 collapse Source:
BBC URL Source:http://BBC Published:Feb 26, 2007 Author:BBC Post Date:2007-02-26 09:16:39 by RickyJ Ping List:*9-11*Subscribe to *9-11* Keywords:None Views:7197 Comments:123
The questions have been asked, but the trolls and paid shills never answer. Instead they begin blabbing lies about some completely different aspect of 9/11. Anything to get you to stop asking that question:
Since it takes weeks to prepare a building for a controlled demolition, and since demolition experts agree that WTC7 was a very simple controlled demolition, then the govt must have been involved in 9/11. Can you deny this?
(WTC1 and WTC2 were also demolished explosive devices, but not in the usual way; the arching of exploding projectiles as the buildings fell at almost the rate of free fall, the pools of molten steel still burning weeks later, the evidence of the use of thermite, the seismic spikes BEFORE the building debris hit the ground, the evidence of squibs, the many eyewitness reports of explosions heard BEFORE the towers fell; all point to planted explosives too, but not in the usual controlled way - the towers were meant to be more spectacular).
BTW, did you know that the fall of WTC7 has only been shown once on television? MSM refuses to show people how it fell, because it is so obvious a controlled demolition. Most Americans don't even know about WTC7.
Victory means exit strategy, and it’s important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is. ~George W. Bush (About the quote: Speaking on the war in Kosovo.)
They know it's a lie but they are too frightened to challenge Jewish/Zionist political power, period.
When it comes down to where the rubber meets the road, YOU'RE EXACTLY RIGHT!!!
That the whole world puts up with this shit is almost beyond belief...
No matter how noble the objectives of a government; if it blurs decency and kindness, cheapens human life, and breeds ill will and suspicion - it is an EVIL government. Eric Hoffer
Yes it is very amazing. They are caught on live TV saying that the Salomon building (WTC7) had collapsed as they are showing a live shot of the reporter with the WTC 7 building still standing behind her talking about the collapse of WTC 7. It would be funny if it weren't such a crime. Heads should roll for this. If this doesn't wake the sheeple up then nothing will. I think this video could do it though. It can't be any more plain than this video that WTC 7 was a controlled demolition and that major media outlets say what they are told to say.
God is always good! "It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02]
It would be funny if it weren't such a crime. Heads should roll for this. If this doesn't wake the sheeple up then nothing will. I think this video could do it though. It can't be any more plain than this video that WTC 7 was a controlled demolition.
Since it takes weeks to prepare a building for a controlled demolition, and since demolition experts agree that WTC7 was a very simple controlled demolition, then the govt must have been involved in 9/11. Can you deny this?
Well apparently your side's own demolition expert, Mr Jowenko, denies this. He said in that video that has been posted on FD4UM numerous times in the last week or so that WTC7 could have been prepped for demolition in only hours. Can you deny this?
(WTC1 and WTC2 were also demolished explosive devices, but not in the usual way; the arching of exploding projectiles as the buildings fell at almost the rate of free fall, the pools of molten steel still burning weeks later, the evidence of the use of thermite, the seismic spikes BEFORE the building debris hit the ground, the evidence of squibs, the many eyewitness reports of explosions heard BEFORE the towers fell; all point to planted explosives too, but not in the usual controlled way - the towers were meant to be more spectacular).
And isn't it ironic that Mr Jowenko also states that WTC1 and WTC2 were clearly NOT controlled demolitions. But don't let that fact get in the way of a good conspiracy, robin.
That the whole world puts up with this shit is almost beyond belief...
In fact I don't believe it.
All falsehood "contains within it the seeds of its own destruction"
The whole world is "whispering behind their hands" about 9/11.
What are the odds that a recently heavily insured landlord with the largest real estate boondoggle in NYC, and which was also the most expensive demolition project ever proposed (2 billion alone for the scaffolding) would have three steel-framed high rises collapse into their own footprints as a result of three fires?? The odds are simply incalculable because it was impossible.
What are the odds that govt and Israeli shills and others who are loyal to their paychecks would lie like Hell to try and make the lead balloon fly?
Well, unlike the collapses there is plenty of evidence that shills will be true to their natures. If the official story was that witchcraft was the culprit then there would be voice over videos saying "Look at those demonic flames licking the interior. They aren't like any flames ever seen before, and the buildings definitely collapsed because of the raging witch fires, just as we were told to believe."
I still get it. I kind of figured this morning when I first saw it that it might not last long so I got a downloaded a copy. I am going to burn it to DVDs and start handing them out. This video is the wakeup call America and Britain needs. This is not only proof that 9/11 was an inside job, it is also proof that the media is a totally controlled mouthpiece for the real perpetrators of 9/11.
God is always good! "It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02]
Click here to download it in AVI format. You will then need a AVI to DVD converter to convert to the format used for playback on DVD players. I'm not sure if there are any free ones out there. I use WinAVI Video Converter but it is not free.
God is always good! "It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02]
What you should do, is take your sorry ass to a strip mine, and watch how they demolish huge piles of dirt to extract ore. See how long it takes them to set up.
Then go talk to some people who detonated large buildings in Las Vegas. Hotels are demolished nearly every day there, and you'd have no shortage of information. Buildings sit empty for months as people prep them for demolition.
You are one of two things BAC. You're either incredibly fucking stupid, or you're the biggest fucking liar on the planet. Which is it?
Just...Damn! The dumb broad was standing there with the fucking building right behind her, all 47 stories of it, saying that WTC7 had already collapsed! That was a glass window, NOT a green screen, behind her! Then the feed from NYC to the BBC in London cuts out right before building 7 actually DOES fall. UnFucking believable.
"First I'm gonna bother everybody I meet, and then I'll probably go home and get drunk."
Everyone should send that video to their local news affiliates to see what they think.
To me, it could be any one number of things that could have went wrong though. If the newscast was being edited for content, there is usually an 8 minute delay on some broadcasts, and in the event of a terror attack, could be upwards of a half hour in some cases.
HOWEVER... This doesn't look like the typical newscast. This looks a lot like a plant. 6 years have gone by, and this is the first we've seen or heard of it? Surely SOMEONE in the UK during 9-11, might have noticed this, and sent it on to the people of the US. Galloway who came under fire over his 9-11 commentary would have LOVED to have been able to cite something such as this.
I'm skeptical, but if this is legit, I doubt it would even make the news here.
#41. To: RickyJ, BeAChooser, robin, HOUNDDAWG, IndieTX, Jethro Tull, All (#7)
On the day 9-11 happened I was watching CNN. It was early afternoon here so it was early evening on the East Coast.
What was weird though is they were trying to figure out what happened, and the woman reporter said she just got information that Afganistan had something to do with it, and bombs were flying in Kabul. She said something like, "Now we will switch to our correspondent in Kabul..." and then there was a reporter standing on a street there, and he was saying bombs were flying in the background, that something was going on, possibly retaliation for the attacks earlier in the day in NYC and DC. Then they switched back to the woman reporter in the states, and then back to him, and he then said something like, "Nevermind, these bombs are the result of a civil war in this country." And that was the end of that.
I wondered what that was all about, why they just so happened to have a CNN reporter in Kabul, and why a few minutes later he said nevermind about the bombs.
BeAChooser, do you have any kind of explanation for that? I thought it was odd.
Gone for me now too. AJ was talking about this on his show today. Apparently at least two of them have been taken down today. They are going to get a bunch more up there and on YouTube.
Sure it's just a honest oversight, I mean why would anyone want this video pulled from public view???
I had a feeling when I saw it this morning that is wasn't going to last long. The BBC probably said they were violating their copyright or something and demanded it be taken down.
God is always good! "It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02]
"I remember getting a call from the DHS commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain this BBC video wildfire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of MSM credibility, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and we watched the video disappear."
God is always good! "It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02]
