THE BOTTOM LINE
Whats at stake here is nothing less than whether the future of the United States, and perhaps even of the world, will be democracy, or else fascism. Thats a lot.
Obama, in his trade-deals, aims to culminate the American aristocracys victory. If he wins all his trade-deals, then the Obama Library and the other Obama-operations will become enormous with the billions pouring in, even as hell go down in history as perhaps the worst President, probably (due to those trade-agreements) worse even than George W. Bush, or Harding, or Buchanan, or Grant, and with a far lengthier catastrophic result trailing after his Presidency, because those trade-deals will be very long-term catastrophes, which might end up destroying the hopes for democracy, not just internationally, but also nationally here in the U.S. The approval and resulting largesse from Americas aristocracy doesnt come cheap, these days.
The American aristocracy has spent billions for these deals since 1953, and now they demand their trillions on that investment. Obama aims to give them the orgasms of power and money that theyve been investing in, during many decades. This has been a lengthy rape, and theyll be very grateful to Obama if he delivers this climax of it, to them handing to them the world, as it were, on a golden platter, reeking from corruption, which is the sweetest smell they know, and which is by far the most profitable of all fragrances, in their nostrils, as they inhale it deep, and receive from it, this jolt, of sheer joy.
Alfred de Zayas is the U.N.s Special Rapporteur on Promotion of a Democratic and Equitable World Order, which is the U.N.s official who speaks for the global institution regarding current issues that are of concern to the achievement of the U.N.s founding objectives. A report in Britains
Guardian on 4 May 2015, titled
UN Calls for Suspension of TTIP Talks, quoted him as saying that the reason why the U.S.-EU negotiations must be suspended is that, We dont want a dystopian future in which corporations and not democratically elected governments call the shots. But the international aristocrats do want that. De Zayas, the institutionalized spokesperson for the vision of FDR and of RGT, spoke for the great progressive leaders who were committed to the defeat of fascism. However, Obama, the Clintons, all Republicans, and most of the leadership around the world, are now again within the fascist camp.
In the long view of history, this matter is, on the global level, a continuation of WW II between democracy versus fascism; but, on the purely American national level, it is a continuation of the American Revolutionary War between democracy and aristocracy. Either way, what had been thought to have been a decisive victory for democracy has turned out to have been not so decisive after all; and the aristocratic, fascistic, forces have regrouped, and, at least
up till June 12th, appeared to be heading for victory. But, this time, if they win, it might be final, because it truly would be a global victory for the aristocracy, and a global defeat for the public everywhere. This is what de Zayas warned of as a dystopian future in which corporations and not democratically elected governments call the shots.
This is a global war, which has been waged since at least 1954, and Obama is aiming to negotiate the surrender of FDR and the Allies who had won WW II. But theyd be surrendering to him. One might call it WW II, round 2. But its also The American Counter-Revolution. By either name, its the same war, and the earlier victories for democracy are on the line, to be determined now, by our generation or, perhaps, only by the aristocrats in our generation (if those few people will be its winners). If they win it, then what could a round 3, or an American counter-counter-revolution, conceivably be like or would it be simply inconceivable? Or, perhaps, just inconceivably violent? All the worlds a prison might sound peaceful for the aristocracy, who would be luxuriously outside those prison-walls in their own gated compounds, and far from earshot of the explosions within; but, for the global public, what would there be left to lose in a global revolution?
The aristocracy already own almost everything. (And
here is another way of looking at this.) Thats not enough for them, but maybe it will finally become too much for everybody else. This type of global warming could thus become a global conflagration, even before the environmental one destroys everything.
This is not biblical-doomsday stuff, at all. In fact, any doomsday that could actually come, wouldnt be at all mythological. Myths are designed to misinform people. Science is designed to inform them. One wont find out what the real threats are, by reading myths. Myths are shaped by the aristocracy, to control the public. Myths helped cause todays problems; theyre no solution to the problems. Theyre part of the problems. Myths are propaganda. They do their jobs, for the deceivers, who generate them.
Rest of the article HERE