See other Miscellaneous Articles
Title: Drudge Headline: SHOCK: MCCAIN VOLUNTEER ATTACKED AND MUTILATED IN PITTSBURGH
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.drudgereport.com/
Published: Oct 23, 2008
Author: Drudge
Post Date: 2008-10-23 16:14:45 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 8887
Comments: 659
'B' CARVED INTO 20-YEAR OLD WOMAN'S FACE... DEVELOPING...
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-141) not displayed.
.
.
.
#142. To: wadosy (#138)
And exactly how did O arrive at this success? Luck? Ability? $500,000,000 in small contributions from Harlem Negros?
I learned long ago not to get into arguments about what was in other peoples heads. Damned shame you seemed destined to keep trying.
And they write innumerable books; being too vain and distracted for silence: seeking every one after his own elevation, and dodging his emptiness. - T. S. Eliot
ah. that's why you're defending the racist patriarch of 4um. i see.
it's a dirty job, but someone's got to do it... or would you rather we let this doofus logic prevail on this forum?
I see, you're not just plain stupid, you've been taught stupid.
And they write innumerable books; being too vain and distracted for silence: seeking every one after his own elevation, and dodging his emptiness. - T. S. Eliot
you cant answer the question, so you gots to call me names. good enough
Does it occur to anyone here that we are being distracted from something.. The story has sensatioanlistic overtones.. What are we not supposed to see?
Myself, I'd gank your account and start faking confessions from you about cannibalism, but that's not Christine's style.
And they write innumerable books; being too vain and distracted for silence: seeking every one after his own elevation, and dodging his emptiness. - T. S. Eliot
You were asking me to justify what someone else posted. Ever heard the term "Guilt By Association"?
And they write innumerable books; being too vain and distracted for silence: seeking every one after his own elevation, and dodging his emptiness. - T. S. Eliot
you are content with cynicom's logic that says: because i dont hate black people, i hate myself.
Why are you arguing with me about what Cynicom posted?
And they write innumerable books; being too vain and distracted for silence: seeking every one after his own elevation, and dodging his emptiness. - T. S. Eliot
I live in PA and parts of Pittsburgh is a crime ridden dump. It's hard for me to ignore the simplest explanation.
Cuz he hates himself! Snicker.
Freepers: hearts full of hate and cowardice, and skulls full, to quote a favorite saying of one of their favorite cowards, of mush.
what we need here, i guess, is an estimation from you of cynicom's mental ability... you dont seem to see any need to point out his logical inconsistencies, so i guess readers will be excused for assuming you think hatred based on race is okay. i dont really see what other conclusion readers can come to.
I think a reasonable conclusion people can reach is that white guilt is a mental disease and you show all the manifestations of the disorder.
Yes, you caught me. I actually hate my black friends, and only hang out with them because I'm taking notes to eventually be turned over to Cynicom so he can put all our dope-smoking asses in jail. Feel better?
And they write innumerable books; being too vain and distracted for silence: seeking every one after his own elevation, and dodging his emptiness. - T. S. Eliot
ah. since i have not joined the redneck cabal in bashing blacks on the slightest pretext, i hate myself. would you mind explaining the logic behind that?
why are you so reluctant to point out the illogic of cynicom's position, that position being: since i dont hate blacks, i hate myself?
Is everyone who dislikes thugs that bash ATM customers on the head a redneck, in your estimation?
And they write innumerable books; being too vain and distracted for silence: seeking every one after his own elevation, and dodging his emptiness. - T. S. Eliot
nope. but anyone who, after repeated urging to do so, refuses to acknowledge the illogic inherent in cynicom's "white guilt" argument is on shaky ground.
Interesting how you ignore the negro criminal but attack the whites who come to the victim's defense. This, my aged old fool, qualifies you for the white guilter of the day award. Report to the nest for delivery.
Because you lack the ability to differentiate between hating blacks and hating thugs. You apparently equate blacks with thugs and will defend the latter to the great detriment of the former.
And they write innumerable books; being too vain and distracted for silence: seeking every one after his own elevation, and dodging his emptiness. - T. S. Eliot
i say again: any of you people who, after repeated urging to do so, refuse to acknowledge the illogic inherent in cynicom's "white guilt" argument is on shaky ground.
The story has sensatioanlistic overtones.. What are we not supposed to see? Excellent point. "We have a winner Johnny, now tell her what she's won!"
"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken
You people?
And they write innumerable books; being too vain and distracted for silence: seeking every one after his own elevation, and dodging his emptiness. - T. S. Eliot
I do believe the "Mother Ship" is calling. Can't you hear it?
"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken
Is the invisible cloaking device up?
Freedom4um is geared towards lovers of and respecters of the First Amendment or, if you will, non PCers. It is time for me to address the issue of "free speech" on Freedom4um. My free speech means that I have 100% control over what I say and everyone else has 0% control over what I say. Now, I understand that there are consequences to exercising my right to free speech, but I still retain 100% control. Free speech means that I have a right to express or spew thoughts and words of preference, love, hate, or anything with which another may disagree. That said, the rules or policies of this forum, which is my private property (see this forum's Mission Statement), are that members can exercise free speech as long as they (1) do not make a specific threat against an identifiable person or target, (2) earnestly debate or discuss the relevant issues that are part and parcel of this forum's reason-to-be. Let me remind you that these are rules for this forum and, as such, do not necessarily apply off of this forum, as public laws should, in most cases, be even less restrictive than private property rules and regulations. Again, free speech on this forum means that people can express their love or hatred for anyone, any group, any race, any culture, or any thing, as long as they adhere to the two contingencies listed above. Everyone else on this forum is similarly at liberty to exercise their free speech right to challenge, debate, argue, or agree with the ideas and speech of another. We will not censor speech as we abhor political correctness and authoritarianism as well as those thought-control and speech-control tyrants who would restrict another's speech. Any limitation on thought and speech constitutes the first level of the destruction of all remaining rights. Afterall, the framers of the Constitution believed that free speech was the most fundamental right to be protected which was the reason that they placed it FIRST in the Bill of Rights. I do not say this lightly, but anyone who cannot handle the content of another's speech may not be suitable for this forum. Such a person may be better suited for a forum whose moderators control and steer the forum's ideas and speech in a given direction. Many people have no concept of what Free Speech and Freedom really mean. Do you?
Do You Know What Freedom Really Means? Freedom4um.com
Ship's Cloak Activated Sir!
"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken
any of you white people who refuse to confront the illogic of cynicom's argument "if they dont hate blacks, they hate themselves" must be racists. at the very least, you dont mind being taken for racists by any casual passerby that reads your threads and watches you kowtowing to this crap.
Abe Foxman paid me 15 bucks to pop Dakmar's tire. Does that mean I'm banned? Would you consider spanking instead?
I don't give a rat's ass what any lurker thinks about my comments. Update: Pittsburgh PD releases artists' sketch of perp who attacked white woman: at least you're honest, which is more than i can say for some.
I get called racist for opposing affirmative action, welfare, crack babies, drive-by shootings, pimps, and purple polyester. Why should any of these things be sacred to either of us?
And they write innumerable books; being too vain and distracted for silence: seeking every one after his own elevation, and dodging his emptiness. - T. S. Eliot
Dak, the founders were racists to these crackpots.
i didnt say they were sacred. based on evidence, i'd say they were bad ideas... especially the purple polyester. but i notice, once again, that you refuse to acknowledge the illogic of cynicom's argument that, if i dont hate blacks, i hate myself. why is that?
Shame on her, shame I say, for dulling his knife blade with her face! Oh the humanity!
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. Once again, because you call anyone who dares point out the disproportionate dysfunction rampant among blacks a racist, yet you revel in ridiculing impoverished whites with your cracks about crackers, or remarks about rednecks, whatever the hell you were babbling about.
And they write innumerable books; being too vain and distracted for silence: seeking every one after his own elevation, and dodging his emptiness. - T. S. Eliot
why are you unable to acknowledge the illogic of cynicom's argument?
Funny her eye isn't swollen. I really wouldn't put anything past the Bush Syndicate.
"Satan / Cheney in "08"
Comments (182 - 659) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latestyou're frustrated by the success of a person that you hate because of the color of his skin.
#143. To: wadosy (#140)
(Edited)
in other words, you cant explain the old man's logic.
#144. To: Dakmar (#141)
Bashing ATM customers on the head is a sign of success? Maybe you should examine your own logic.
#145. To: Dakmar (#143)
Ilearned long ago not to get into arguments about what was in other peoples heads.
#146. To: wadosy (#144)
that's why you're defending the racist patriarch of 4um.
#147. To: Dakmar (#146)
#148. To: Jethro Tull, wadosy, bluegrass, lodwick, noone222, TwentyTwelve (#142)
#149. To: wadosy (#145)
or would you rather we let this doofus logic prevail on this forum?
#150. To: wadosy (#147)
you cant answer the question, so you gots to call me names.
#151. To: Dakmar (#149)
#152. To: wadosy (#151)
#153. To: Lady X (#148)
#154. To: Dakmar (#152)
Why are you arguing with me about what Cynicom posted?
#155. To: Dakmar (#150)
(Edited)
Why are you arguing with me about what Cynicom posted?
#156. To: wadosy (#155)
i dont really see what other conclusion readers can come to.
#157. To: wadosy (#155)
so i guess readers will be excused for assuming you think hatred based on race is okay.
#158. To: Jethro Tull (#156)
(Edited)
I think a reasonable conclusion people can reach is that white guilt is a mental disease and you show all the manifestations of the disorder.
#159. To: Dakmar (#157)
#160. To: wadosy (#158)
since i have not joined the redneck cabal in bashing blacks on the slightest pretext,
#161. To: Dakmar (#160)
(Edited)
Is everyone who dislikes thugs that bash ATM customers on the head a redneck, in your estimation?
#162. To: wadosy (#158)
#163. To: wadosy (#159)
why are you so reluctant to point out the illogic of cynicom's position, that position being: since i dont hate blacks, i hate myself?
#164. To: Dakmar (#163)
#165. To: Lady X (#148)
Does it occur to anyone here that we are being distracted from something..
#166. To: wadosy (#164)
any of you people
#167. To: Jethro Tull, wadosy (#162)
Interesting how you ignore the negro criminal but attack the whites who come to the victim's defense. This, my aged old fool, qualifies you for the white guilter of the day award. Report to the nest for delivery.
#168. To: Original_Intent (#167)
#169. To: wadosy (#116)
so you're saying this site is geared towards racists
#170. To: Jethro Tull (#168)
#171. To: Dakmar (#166)
You people?
#172. To: christine, Dakmar (#169)
(1) do not make a specific threat against an identifiable person or target
Mike Flaherty: Yeah, it's been there a long time. I wish I knew which corner.
My Man Godfrey (1936)
#173. To: wadosy (#171)
at the very least, you dont mind being taken for racists by any casual passerby that reads your threads
-Schweizerische Schuetzenzeitung (Swiss Shooting Federation) April, 1941
#174. To: X-15 (#173)
#175. To: wadosy (#171)
at the very least, you dont mind being taken for racists by any casual passerby that reads your threads and watches you kowtowing to this crap
#176. To: Dakmar (#175)
#177. To: Dakmar (#175)
(Edited)
I get called racist for opposing affirmative action, welfare, crack babies, drive-by shootings, pimps, and purple polyester. Why should any of these things be sacred to either of us?
#178. To: Cynicom (#41)
If they do it will be the fault of the young lady that somehow attacked the innocent young man.
Lord Acton
#179. To: wadosy (#177)
(Edited)
#180. To: Dakmar (#179)
#181. To: wadosy (#68)
.
.
.