See other (s)Elections Articles
Title: Was the 4um Hijacked by the McCain's Losers? I think So
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Nov 4, 2008
Author: Me
Post Date: 2008-11-04 11:27:21 by a vast rightwing conspirator
Keywords: None
Views: 4016
Comments: 172
It's quite sad, actually, because the late McCainism on proud display at the 4um leaves the impression of a bunch of half-witted, hateful losers well... showing themselves as half-witted losers for the world to see and throw up. Yes, I know, 'it makes no difference', 'it's all the same', 'it's 'them' who do these terrible things to poor 'us'' which, dear losers, it's just loser B.S. Last night, I watched some of the losers abandoning all decency and competing to say the more vile things about Obama's dead grandmother - that's where the 'world throwing up when noticing you' part comes from. You should be quite proud of yourself and make sure that you keep congratulating each other for your brilliant wits and moral fibers because no one else will. Just to clarify. I am not saying that everyone who posts at this site is a despicable loser. The despicable losers may, in fact, be a small minority but, as far as I can see, they are the ones who are squealing and screaming and, possibly, keeping other decent persons away from this site. For the record, I find Christine as a most decent person, even if she doesn't always agree with me and there are others with whom I don't always agree but who are decent. Personally, I have no problems with disagreements but I also understand that no human (like myself) can have a meaningful dialogue or debate with pigs or chimps or McCain lovers (like the current frequent squealers) who claim that they are not McCain lovers. It would be great if some of them could evolve and improve.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-56) not displayed.
.
.
.
#57. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#47)
Such a stunt; such a typical whitey. uh..both of those comments were in reference to obama's 'throwing grandma under the bus' when he referred to her as a typical white woman and admitted (in his book) to trying to distance himself from his white half. no one's allowed to joke, huh?
A man is none the less a slave because he is allowed to choose a new master once in a term of years. — Lysander Spooner
Patagonia? The Mariana Trench would be better. What pisses me off about this election is that no matter who wins, one group of people that I despise will be happy. If Obama wins, the scum over at DU will be ecstatic. If McCain wins, the mental retardates at Free Republic will be celebrating. I guess my only consolation is that one camp or the other will be unhappy with one of the outcomes.
Sorry. I'm not going into Absurdistan with you right now. Maybe later.
lol
A man is none the less a slave because he is allowed to choose a new master once in a term of years. — Lysander Spooner
Ah...I think he posts at the Collective.
Yes, let's talk decency. freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/re...? ArtNum=89946&Disp=25#C25 Like the man said about the middle name, that it was given by someone who never expected him to go into politics. My name can also be written M. Joseph McCarthy, so, do you think I am scary to commies? Should I also go out and kill doctors who circumcise baby boys to revenge my involuntarily destroyed body part? Shit girl, why, that made me look positively Jewish, oh my, or dear me. And let's not forget those fucking Catholic priests who baptize babies, I hate the thought of a fucking dirtbag jihad minded member of a blood cult run to worship a dirtbag shit out onto the ground named Jesus by his whore mom Mary, the prostitute bitch make me angry, KILL FUCKING CHRISTIANS KILL!!!! Are you starting to fucking get a clue, huh? Any fucking brain cells firing yet? HELLO McFLY!!!! HELLO!!!!!!!
That sounds like Noriega's "Dignity Battalions" Just a bunch of stealing thugs
It's the second mouse that gets the cheese
Every four years, I always hope that both sides will cancel each other out like matter/anti-matter. That's hope I can believe in.
Before the neocons drummed up propaganda on the issue, how many people in America honestly gave a damn about whether Ossetia was part of Georgia or Russia, or were even aware of its existence? As for the Wall Street jump, firms like Goldman Sachs own both candidates and can count on their support for future bailouts. When Bush, Nancy and Barney walked hand in hand to dole out the trillion dollars, Obama and McCain were right behind them. Whoever is elected, Goldman Sachs will be the real winner.
The joke is on them. The DUers and Freepers think they're one another's opposites, when in fact one's a pink hog, the other a piebald hog, and they're both wallowing at different ends of the same mudhole. A few months ago this site was in danger of turning into DU lite. Now it's looking to become Free Republic lite.
These were the kids who sat in the 1st seat, 1st row and tattled to the teacher when she came back from a smoke break. Weasels. He wouldn't have lasted a week in Brooklyn. May his children be offered to Obama at the altar of white slavery.
The day the poor woman dies? Yes, I guess so. It is very, very funny.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
Humor is hate, comrade.
Well, they are counting the votes in Guam which went Boosh two to one on 2004, Barack Obama is winning there, big. It is a good omen. I predict the pundits call it Obama when the MidWest polls close at around 8 PM back there time.
A lot of mixed race people resent one side or the other of their families. It's their way of overdoing it in identifying with the other (usually "minority") side. Which makes you wonder how much BHO really mourned his grandmother's death. Probably not much, but getting all choked up talking about it can win votes.
I think with Ms. C at the helm, we're ok. It takes a lot to get banned from here. It takes nothing to get banned at the other two places.
I was talking about the posters, not the management.
Liberals Attacking Palins Children Published on August 31, 2008 By Island Dog In Democrat This is coming from the same people who accuse the GOP of being "liars" and "smear merchants". From Newsbusters: As I reported earlier, the scurrilous claim that McCain vice presidential pick Governor Sarah Palin faked her pregnancy with a Down's Syndrome child is beginning to spread among the lowest of the nutrooters. Now, the unhinged, smear site DemocraticUnderground.com has boosted this lie to their front pages. Naturally, since these hate sites feed into each other, the spurious source of the DU story is another DailyKos story like the one I earlier reported upon. Pile this on top of the low blow from TV's Alan Colmes who claims that Palin didn't practice proper prenatal care before she had the baby with Down's Syndrome, blaming the Mother for her disabled child. Well, the lefties don't know a low road they won't take. (Colmes' site has crashed right now, but this is the address if it ever comes back: http://www.alan.com/2008/08/30/did-palin- take-proper-pre-natal-care/) Liberals really know how to lose elections.
La Douche. Perhaps the tragic passing of TOOT will give O more time to take care of his illegal immigrant auntie Zatooie in Boston?
http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi? ArtNum=90111&Disp=11#C11
A man is none the less a slave because he is allowed to choose a new master once in a term of years. — Lysander Spooner
My bad. Seven cylinders and no coffee.
further, your continuing to paint anyone who is not an obama supporter/worshipper as a mccain supporter/lover is guileful. the majority of 4um's members are against both. you know that. What do you expect from a deep cover lying commie traitor ? ? ?
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
And his brother living on a buck a month in Odingaland.
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
Christine, I stated that I believe that the majority of this site's contributors are not terrible or despicable people. This is the quote: "Just to clarify. I am not saying that everyone who posts at this site is a despicable loser. The despicable losers may, in fact, be a small minority but, as far as I can see, they are the ones who are squealing and screaming and, possibly, keeping other decent persons away from this site." What I observed was the the despicable few tend to be a little bit hyper-active and they leave the impression that almost everyone who is a 4um fan is a terrible person, which is not true. It also happens that some of the more sensitive, decent or non-despicable contributors pack their bags, leaving the terrible ones behind. You know that this is happening. No? Contributors like these managed to destroy the once interesting site that LibertyForum was and turned LibertyPost into the joke that it appears to be today.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
Name names.
Vast... I no longer post to you because you have done your share of chasing people away, and that goes way back to Ron Paul. Endless carping about Paul losing got tiresome to many people, especially when you offered nothing constructive for the 4um. Not a thing did you offer, just as now. Read your post above. Childish at the best. Since I have been here you have never offered anything to support 4um, not a thing. Endless childish attacking gets tiresome and boring, people leave.
My friend, I don't B.S. So, here are some names that come to mind, and I didn't try very hard. Robin who left because she couldn't stand YOU. Aristides who didn't find it worth mingling with the squealers. Dr. Penguinite who, I believe, shows up every now and then but not as often as he used to. These are the 3 that came to mind. There may be others. Are you happy now? Oh, just to clarify: I don't exactly agree with Robin's or Aristide's views. I probably agree with Pinguinite's a lot even though he was in the camp that thought that Ron Paul should have used some clever maneuvering to hijack the GOP nomination. But, all of the above are decent people and they understand that there is a difference between strongly disagreeing with someone and attempting to attack the opponent rather than debate over the disagreement.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
Fuck her She's a lefty who pretended to be a Libertarian until she showed her true colors as a RAT...just like you
It's the second mouse that gets the cheese
She's a lefty who pretended to be a Libertarian until she showed her true colors as a RAT...just like you Thank you for perfectly illustrating my point.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
Hilarious!!!! Robin did a political 180 and has spent the last few weeks manning a phone bank for Obingo. She no longer stands for freedom. Aristides, likewise, hopped in the Obama tank and lost all credibility. His ego doesn't permit the second tier status he earned. Neil is the king of poor judgement and his 2nd amendment argument was poorly received here. So, what is it we've lost? Two PILES and one expat. You're a pisser :P
Vast has no point. It was clear long ago that Vast was a closet queen. I cannot recall ever reading anything original nor profound from Vast that ever elicited any interest. It has always been childish partisan carping. To my mind Vast exhibits a total absence of ability to think on his or her own, whichever.
Like JT said she no longer stands for freedom, so fuck her and fuck you too Now go ping anybody you want, you little twerp hall monitor It's the second mouse that gets the cheese
Bless your heart, my friend :) May you see the light and turn your back to the dark side, one of these days, soon.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
Some former Ron Paul supporters turned out to be closet leftists and now support Obama. Others turned out to be closet neocons and now support McCain. And the difference is what? Freeperville vs. DU? Screw them both - Ron Paul had the good sense and integrity to refuse to endorse either candidate instead of pulling a Buchanan and backing the neocon in the race, or a Paul Craig Roberts and backing the liberal.
Don't worry, and do not be alarmed. I have nothing against you. I only used your valuable contribution as an exhibit to illustrate a point I was making to someone else. So, it has nothing to do with you.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
You seem to be inferring or suggesting that I ban and/or censor certain "contributors." Below is my free speech policy. Any and all are welcomed to exercise their right to freedom of association or non association. It is time for me to address the issue of "free speech" on Freedom4um. My free speech means that I have 100% control over what I say and everyone else has 0% control over what I say. Now, I understand that there are consequences to exercising my right to free speech, but I still retain 100% control. Free speech means that I have a right to express or spew thoughts and words of preference, love, hate, or anything with which another may disagree. That said, the rules or policies of this forum, which is my private property (see this forum's Mission Statement), are that members can exercise free speech as long as they (1) do not make a specific threat against an identifiable person or target, (2) earnestly debate or discuss the relevant issues that are part and parcel of this forum's reason-to-be. Let me remind you that these are rules for this forum and, as such, do not necessarily apply off of this forum, as public laws should, in most cases, be even less restrictive than private property rules and regulations. Again, free speech on this forum means that people can express their love or hatred for anyone, any group, any race, any culture, or any thing, as long as they adhere to the two contingencies listed above. Everyone else on this forum is similarly at liberty to exercise their free speech right to challenge, debate, argue, or agree with the ideas and speech of another. We will not censor speech as we abhor political correctness and authoritarianism as well as those thought-control and speech-control tyrants who would restrict another's speech. Any limitation on thought and speech constitutes the first level of the destruction of all remaining rights. Afterall, the framers of the Constitution believed that free speech was the most fundamental right to be protected which was the reason that they placed it FIRST in the Bill of Rights. I do not say this lightly, but anyone who cannot handle the content of another's speech may not be suitable for this forum. Such a person may be better suited for a forum whose moderators control and steer the forum's ideas and speech in a given direction.
Like I said, I feel sorry for your kids having something like you as a parent
It's the second mouse that gets the cheese
The people who left did so as they could not earnestly or honestly debate. They exposed themselves as frauds and as such, tucked tail in shame and left. Good riddance.
I never suggested that you banned anyone. I believe I stated that some just... left and that's a fact. It happens and it's natural. I, myself, haven't visited LibertyPost or LibertyForum in many months. I wasn't banned, I simply lost interest. Does it seem that you are encouraging some of the more feeble-minded or bad- mannered who don't know better than 'debate' by personally attacking those they disagree with? I am afraid that it does seem to be the case. This is the way I see it and I am doing nothing but express my view on the topic.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
I wouldn't vote for either but I do understand the argument that McCain is less likely to tinker w/the 2nd, nor increase our taxes and, of course, there won't be Kwanzaa celebrations in the WH if he wins. I honestly believe Obama is a creation of the radical left and his domestic policy will resemble the policies of a collegiate Black Student Union at any university in America.
Never did.
Comments (98 - 172) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestI thought she kacked when she was run over by the bus.
#58. To: bluegrass (#27)
Personally, I'd rather the McCain shills and the Obamaphiles disappear, along with their candidates. Hear, hear. Maybe to Patagonia
#59. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#56)
Did you ping Obama
#60. To: scrapper2 (#37)
outside the 57 US states...oops, I must have been channeling the massive knowledge and intelligence of Presidential Candidate Barry Obama just now...I meant to say, 50 US states, of course...;)
#61. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#56)
Did you ping Obama when you wrote those terrible things about her last night?
#62. To: a vast rightwing conspirator, demon boy, Obama your people need guidance, paging Rev. Wright (#56)
Did you ping Obama when you wrote those terrible things about her last night?
#63. To: Jethro Tull (#44)
You will make a wonderful trainee in Obama's one-million person civilian home guard.
#64. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#58)
#65. To: scrapper2 (#37)
Ossetia where or what?
#66. To: bluegrass (#64)
(Edited)
Every four years, I always hope that both sides will cancel each other out like matter/anti-matter.
#67. To: Flintlock (#63)
#68. To: christine (#57)
no one's allowed to joke, huh?
#69. To: christine (#57)
no one's allowed to joke, huh?
#70. To: Flintlock (#20)
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power -- he's free again. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
#71. To: christine (#57)
admitted (in his book) to trying to distance himself from his white half.
#72. To: Rupert_Pupkin, christine (#66)
A few months ago this site was in danger of turning into DU lite. Now it's looking to become Free Republic lite.
#73. To: bluegrass (#72)
#74. To: christine (#57)
This was really funny way back when.......
#75. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#68)
#76. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#68)
#77. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#73)
#78. To: Christine, a vast deep cover commie traitor (#35)
i just reread the comments on that thread. no one cheered the death of obama's grandmother. what was expressed was suspicion and cynicism about the timing and circumstances of her passing.
#79. To: Jethro Tull (#75)
Perhaps the tragic passing of TOOT will give O more time to take care of his illegal immigrant auntie Zatooie in Boston?
#80. To: christine (#35)
our continuing to paint anyone who is not an obama supporter/worshipper as a mccain supporter/lover is guileful. the majority of 4um's members are against both. you know that.
#81. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#80)
It also happens that some of the more sensitive, decent or non-despicable contributors pack their bags, leaving the terrible ones behind. You know that this is happening. No? Contributors like these managed to destroy the once interesting site that LibertyForum was and turned LibertyPost into the joke that it appears to be today.
#82. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#80)
"Just to clarify. I am not saying that everyone who posts at this site is a despicable loser. The despicable losers may, in fact, be a small minority but, as far as I can see, they are the ones who are squealing and screaming and, possibly, keeping other decent persons away from this site."
#83. To: Jethro Tull (#81)
(Edited)
Name names.
#84. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#83)
Robin
#85. To: Flintlock, Christine, Jethro Tull (#84)
Robin Fuck her
#86. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#83)
#87. To: Flintlock (#84)
#88. To: a vast rightwing conspirator, Jethro Tull (#85)
robin
#89. To: Cynicom (#87)
#90. To: Jethro Tull (#86)
Aristides, likewise, hopped in the Obama tank and lost all credibility.
#91. To: Flintlock (#88)
FUCK YOU!
#92. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#80)
#93. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#91)
#94. To: christine (#92)
#95. To: christine (#92)
(Edited)
#96. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#90)
#97. To: Jethro Tull (#86)
She no longer stands for freedom.
.
.
.