So in order to make changes to Wiki that stick and don't get eliminated by the Wiki gang, these Zionists have to overcome the editorial position of those established editors, by argument in the Wiki discussion pages for each Wiki page (this can be seen by clicking the "Discussion" tab at the top of any Wiki topic page, link is to the Wiki page for the Gaza blockade). Sometimes you can convince the Wikians to change a page, naturally requiring a reputable footnoted source to support the changes. You can see the History of a page and who has attempted to change the page and whether the changes were accepted or eliminated (rolled back) by clicking the History tab. This can be very informative if there is a concerted effort, in this case by Zionists, to exert pressure to control the content on an issue and present a slanted view as an independent and neutral article.

At any rate, the Wiki establishment should anticipate extensive and unrelenting challenges to their pages and should expect that, if they are sufficiently resistant to the pro-Zionist position, that they and Wiki will be tarred and feathered as anti-Semitic, merely because they are not willing to peddle the Zionist line while pretending neutrality.

Such an attack on the Wikians as "antisemitic" would begin with a few articles in places like Commentary or Weekly Standard with headlines like "Is Wikipedia Antisemitic?". Then there would be little blurbs on Fox News, maybe an article or two in NYSlimes or WaPo, setting the stage for a full media assault (the media establishment already hates the Wikians for obvious reasons and would like to destroy their influence over information and public opinion which is far more extensive than any newspaper).

In short, they're planning to ADL the Wiki folk if they don't cave in to the Zionist party line. This may be comparable to the recent actions that have been taken against Julian Assange of WikiLeaks.

Wikipedia Editors Paid to Protect Political, Tech, and Media Figures

http://breakthematrix.com/blog/wikipedia-editors-paid-to-protect-political- tech-and-media-figures/?mc_cid=1a01507ef8&mc_eid=c2f3577829

"A report in Huffington Post recently revealed the case of Wikipedia editor (((Ed Sussman))), who was paid by media clients such as NBC and Axios to help diminish critical material. Paid editors operating in a similar manner to Sussman have worked on behalf of CNN contributor (((Hilary Rosen))) and the CEOs of Reddit and Intel, among other clients"....

Reddit is evil too -- allowed somebody to post my phone number for harassment calling because he didn't like my politics.

tinyurl.com/2s3f3t82

Yeah, who knows what LV's readership is post-covidiotically -- but it's got to be many thousands per day. In any case it's one of my various congregations, and knowing that people will be reading these comments for years to come puts a spring in my step. Yeah, I get replies from it that are years old!

I'm telling you folks, for all its problems and faults, 4um remains the main temple of timely truth on this earth. Every day we're piling up the suppressed and PC-destroying facts makes it all the more so.

Please think of it that way and USE it freely as such. The Latest Articles page's search boxes, judiciously worked, are your million-entry card catalog. Egad, nothing can top it!

you've told us of your problems in that area.

Hey, I'm not vaxxed, I'm fine.

I was making fun of Prez, Pedo Pampers, not you.

I've got to know what it's got to do with this page?

Nothing. It was a mistake. I didn't notice it until you posted.

Better?

I started doing the [Trash Thread] so I don't smeg up the sidebar with BS that isn't worthy of its own thread and push everything else down. Everybody is free to use it.