We Jews love our golems. We’ve been loving our golems for thousands of years, and what a strife-free history we have to show for it! In case you’re unfamiliar with the golem fable, I’ll give you the CliffsNotes edition. There’s no one single version of the story, and each retelling might alter certain details, but the unchanging basic narrative is this: Jews are being threatened by Gentiles (no, really?), so a rabbi obsessed with protecting his people builds a giant humanoid monster out of clay (or mud) and brings it to life to defend his beloved shtetl (or village, or kosher deli).
Once the main threat has been defeated, the rabbi, in his lust for vengeance, can’t stop using his golem to right real or imagined wrongs. Soon enough, the golem starts attacking Jews. The monster has now turned its ire on the very people it was built to serve, and the rabbi is forced to battle his own creation.
Get the irony? Because it’s about as subtle as a Buddy Hackett routine. The hellish creature the Jews conjure for their salvation ends up turning on them. A people blinded by fear and paranoia create a demon that metastasizes and grows beyond their control.
It’s been four thousand years. Can we please finally start acting like we’ve learned the lesson of that story?
What is Congressmuslim Ilhan Omar if not a golem? For decades, leftist Jews have been the biggest boosters of flooding the West with Third World immigrants. “Hey, here’s a plan—let’s dump a hundred thousand Somalis in the whitest parts of the U.S. That’ll save us from Fargo Hitler!” Inundating the West with nonwhite immigrants is seen by Jews as an insurance policy against “white supremacy.” The idea is that these immigrants will act as a wedge, diluting “white power” while remaining small enough in numbers to be manageable. “Can we please finally start acting like we’ve learned the lesson of that story?”
Jews have done this elsewhere—playing two groups against each other as a way of assuring Jewish security. “Let’s play Hamas against the Palestinian Authority. Let’s play ISIS against Assad.” To be fair, this is not a uniquely Jewish strategy. Arguably, the British did this kind of thing to perfection during their colonization craze, playing different ethnic groups and castes against each other for their own benefit. But for people who pride themselves on having an abnormally high IQ, we Jews can be among the most retarded of geniuses, because that strategy no longer works. It used to work when the masterminds, be they Brits or colonial Americans (playing different Indian tribes against each other), could control the flow of information. But today we live in a world in which even the lowliest bark-eater in the Kalahari can have internet access. It’s not as easy to fool entire groups of people anymore (individuals, sure, but not an entire race, ethnicity, or faction). I don’t care how little one might think of Third World intellectual acuity; even a dog will eventually figure out that you’re not really going to throw the ball after ten or twenty fake-outs.
And now we Jews, so worried that Minnesota might become the Frozen Fourth Reich if left in the hands of evil whites, have created for ourselves a good old-fashioned golem in Ilhan Omar (and a bunch of other Third World freshman congressthingies). Yeah, Omar hates whites. Yeah, she thinks “white supremacy” lurks behind every glass of milk and “OK” finger sign. But she hates Jews a hell of a lot more. And here are my people—my brilliant retards—now forced to defeat the monster they created, a monster not only brought about by Jewish-backed policies, but one that mirrors Jewish rhetoric like a pro.
Jews: “Oy vey! Omar’s criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic!” Omar: “Inshallah! Your criticism of my criticism of Israel is Islamophobic!” Jews: “Your criticism of our criticism of your criticism of Israel is anti-Jewish!” Omar: “Your criticism of my criticism of your criticism of my criticism of Israel is anti-Muslim!” Jews: “Your criticism of our criticism of your criticism of our criticism of your criticism of Israel will lead to mass shootings of Jews like what happened in Pittsboig!” Omar: “Your criticism of my criticism of your criticism of my criticism of your criticism of my criticism of Israel will lead to mass shootings of Muslims like what happened in New Zealand!”
Peas in a pod. And who could have seen that coming? Only every fucking Jew in the world who ever read the golem story.
The reaction of Muslims to the New Zealand shooting has been fascinating to observe. The exploitation of the tragedy, the calls for censorship and suppression of political views, the guilting of “all whites” over something one dude did…Jews could not have done a better job. This is Yo-Yo Ma-level shit, outsiders learning the sheet music of a different culture and performing it better than the originators. In the words of Sato from Karate Kid II, “The student has become the teacher.”
Muslim terrorists murdered twenty Filipino Christians as they attended services in their church two months ago, and do you recall the response from local Muslim leaders? Was it “We must address the anti-Christian bigotry in our community?” Or “We must stand in solidarity with our Christian countrymen?” Nope. It was “Well, to stop us from killing more Christians, let us carve a Muslim-only autonomous region in the country.” That’s literally like whites responding to the New Zealand massacre by saying, “Well, the solution is to keep New Zealand white and Christian. If we don’t have to mix, we won’t have any more race- or religion-based mass shootings.”
How do you think the media would have responded to that? Or the U.N.? Or most Western politicians? But in fact, the world response (and the response from media organs like CNN and the BBC) to the Muzz demand was essentially “Yes! Yes! Give them an autonomous region, so that they needn’t mix with those damn Christians.”
This is a point that bears repeating: A white Christian kills a bunch of Muslims in New Zealand, and the response is “More diversity! More mixing! Force them damn intolerant whiteys to get along, or jail their asses as racists.” Muslims in the Philippines massacre a bunch of Christians, and the response is “Let the Muslims be autonomous! Let them live free of mixing, free of diversity! Let them never have to see another Christian again!”
What we’ve witnessed in the aftermath of the New Zealand shooting is the full maturation of the golem. It doesn’t need instructions from the rabbi anymore. I realized that when I saw a couple of college-age Muzz bimbos berating Chelsea Clinton at a vigil for the New Zealand victims. According to the harassers (who were rewarded for their efforts with a BuzzFeed column), Chelsea’s criticism of Ilhan Omar’s views on Israel “led” to the slaughter in New Zealand.
A murderous Aussie troll mows down Kiwi Muzzies, leaving behind a 74-page manifesto outlining his reasons, not one of which has anything to do with Chelsea Clinton, and yet some ground-level Muzz agitators successfully manage to steer the conversation toward the completely unrelated topic of Clinton vs. Omar as a way of silencing any criticism of the latter’s anti-Israel views.
That is some ADL-worthy shit right there. I mean that. Grudging respect to the Muslims on this one; they may be detestable, but you gotta admire the skill. Abe Foxman in his prime could not have done better.
I think I can best chart the evolution of the golem by recalling the February 2011 Lara Logan sexual assault. CBS reporter Logan was covering the “Arab Spring” in Tahrir Square in Egypt when a bunch of elated Muslim Brotherhood thugs sexually assaulted her. The Brotherhood’s beloved “mufti,” Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, was a well-known advocate of rape (I mean literally, he was in favor of rape). So after Logan’s rape at the hands of al-Qaradawi’s goons, one would think the blame would fall first on the rapists, and second on their rape-happy spiritual leader. But no! Suzi Parker, a self-proclaimed “anti-redneck” white writing for AOL/HuffPost, put the blame squarely where it really belonged: on Sarah Palin and Ann Coulter! See, within the previous year, Palin had popularized the term “lamestream media,” and Coulter had recently mocked the press during her appearance at CPAC. So of course the rape was the fault of Palin and Coulter, and not the actual rapists or their pro-rape guru.
“Journalist” (and NYU fellow) Nir Rosen, a self-proclaimed “anti-Israel Jew,” added that the reasons for Logan’s rape were irrelevant anyway, because she had it coming for being a “warmonger.”
The unifying factor in the media’s response to the sexual assault was that the Muzzies were not to blame. They were influenced by a white Christian failed vice presidential candidate from Alaska who they’d never heard of (does “lamestream” even translate to Arabic?), and a popular white Christian pundit and author who gave a speech in Orlando to a group they’d never heard of. And besides, they were justified in their rapery because if evil “warmonger” babes don’t deserve a gang bang, who does?
Yet looking back on that 2011 incident, it’s clear that Muslims still had to rely on self-hating whites and self-loathing Jews to do the rationalizing for them. Not so post-New Zealand. The skilled exploitation of the mass shooting, the campaign to attack and silence people who had nothing to do with the killer or his motives, is coming from Muslims. They’ve learned from the best, and now they’re doin’ it for themselves.
FUBU: “For Ummah By Ummah.” Jews should be particularly afraid of their new Islamic golems. Muzzies might not be smarter than Jews, but they’re stronger and more numerous, and their level of “batshit crazy” is off the charts. Of all the golems the Hebraic high-IQ dunces have created—from the communist state they helped birth in 1917, which later turned on them, to the integration craze they helped create here in the U.S., which now forces them to flee public schools—the Muzz golem has the potential to be the most destructive one yet.
In a perfect world, these rabbinical Rain Men would finally get the fuck over the Holocaust and end their war of hostility against the West. They’d see that whites are no longer the enemy, but indeed the opposite. They’d see that importing foreign mud to mold golem after golem in traditionally white regions of the U.S. is bad strategy.
But the world isn’t perfect, and Jews are our dumbest geniuses. It’ll take a lot more than one or two Ilhan Omars to make them rethink their views. Hell, if the exodus of French Jews from a France now infested with immigrant golems hasn’t altered their thinking, nothing will.
New generations of Jews will continue to read the golem story and learn nothing from it.
We Jews are master storytellers. Trouble is, we prefer telling ’em to understanding ’em. And that’s both frustrating and tragic.
#1: Lod To: Ada (#0)
Lod posted on 2019-04-02 21:13:36 Reply Private Reply
#2: Dakmar To: Ada (#0)
Who is responsible for the terrorist attack that killed at least 50 New Zealanders as they prayed in their mosques? Looked at one way, the answer is simple: The shooter alone bears the guilt for his crimes. But the picture is wider than that.
In the days since the attack, attention has rightly been focused on the shooter’s admiration of white supremacists, especially violent ones like Norwegian mass murderer Anders Breivik, whom the shooter called his “true inspiration” and who allegedly gave his “blessing” for the attack. His manifesto called Donald Trump “a symbol of renewed white identity and common purpose,” and uses words that directly echo Trump’s own. The discussion can even be expanded to those who have helped shape the U.S. president’s message, like Steve Bannon, Stephen Miller, and Donald Trump Jr. It’s not unreasonable to place some measure of blame on those who have stoked the international spread of white-supremacist ideology.
So why do I feel so guilty? And why am I so angry not just at the obvious targets, but at my country?
I’m a white Australian. I know that blaming myself and my cohort is illogical, but I can’t escape the feeling that all of white Australia is implicated in the deaths—a white majority that has fomented and let foment hate. Though he may have labeled himself a European, 28-year-old Brenton Tarrant was an Aussie through and through, growing up in a country town north of Sydney, steeped in mainstream Australian racism and our particular national brand of Islamophobia. He grew up in the same Murdoch-controlled mass media environment that the rest of us did—one that recently trashed Islam 2,891 times in a single year—and under the same governments, with prime ministers who have repeatedly stoked anti-Muslim sentiment for votes, with one major party making it central to their electoral strategy.
I grew up steeped in the same environment, just two years younger than Tarrant, and when I was a child the omnipresent racism seemed, well, normal to me. Australia was a proud multicultural country, I was told, but this also seemed to encompass race riots and the turning back of boats filled with brown, black, and Muslim refugees. Publicly demonstrative racists like Australian Sen. Pauline “Please explain” Hanson were a national joke, not a national threat—the refugees were the threat, apparently. These days, as one local from Tarrant’s hometown told the New York Times, “There is still a lot of racism around the place. It’s usually sort of hidden a little bit.”
You could say the same of federal politics, with its coded appeals to white, racist fear—it’s only hidden until suddenly you can’t avoid it. Indeed, many white Aussies will tell you that the persistence of racist tropes is mostly harmless, as many did after the Serena Williams cartoon incident. Australians: We’re just a bunch of fun-loving, cheeky larrikins, right, mate? Well, we can now say that one of the deadliest hate crimes in history was perpetrated by a white Australian. But not just by a white Australian: As Amy Remeikis at the Guardian put it, the massacre was “carried out in the name of white Australia.”
I’ve long felt that racism is Australia’s most serious problem, our “festering sore”—I’ve written about it before. Many other Aussies have also been unsurprised, as I was, to learn that Tarrant was one of ours—but that lack of surprise should be more damning, not less. I have not myself stoked racial resentment, nor did I vote for Sen. Fraser Anning or the governments that made race-baiting appeals. But did I do enough to stop the ideology’s spread? Did I condemn hatred loud enough? Did I fight white supremacy every day? I did not pull the trigger, but it does not feel right to say I bear absolutely none of this national burden.
Shame, guilt, remorse, disgust—whatever you want to call it, I’m not alone. A number of Australian commentators are expressing similar feelings over the actions of “one of our citizens.” We face an overdue and now unavoidable reckoning with the role our anti-immigrant politics and culture played in shaping and normalizing Tarrant’s brand of hate. We are a nation born of shame.
What also cannot be ignored is that our citizen went and did this as a guest in another nation. As Christchurch Mayor Lianne Dalziel told CNN: “He did not develop his hatred here. He came here to perform this act of terrorism.” Why did he go to New Zealand if he was an Australian citizen angry about Muslim immigration? Partly it may have been Australia’s strict gun laws; his attack would have been much harder to pull off at home. Tarrant didn’t originally intend to target New Zealand—he was only living there while he “planned and trained”—but he soon decided that New Zealand would “bring to attention the truth of the assault on our civilization, that no where in the world was safe, the invaders were in all of our lands, even in the remotest areas of the world.”
The horror of this attack is compounded by the fact that New Zealand is meant to be our mate—our greener, funnier, more progressive little sibling. There are many clichéd metaphors to describe the special relationship between Australia and New Zealand, and they feel especially meaningless now, but it’s the closest relationship we have. It’s a closeness Tarrant took advantage of, committing his crime in the country that welcomes us without a visa.
We are a nation born of shame. A white-majority Australia exists only as the result of a genocidal invasion—another irony missed by Tarrant (and Trump) in his rants about invasion. It’s an original sin the country has recently grappled with: In 2008, the nation officially apologized to Indigenous Australians for its extreme mistreatment of them, in particular the horrendous policy of taking Indigenous children from their families—“a great stain [on] the nation’s soul,” said the prime minister at the time. Australians have also taken collective responsibility for more local tragedies. Earlier this year when Palestinian exchange student Aiia Maasarwe was murdered walking home in Melbourne, Australians were stricken. When her father Saeed came to Australia and took part in a televised interview, presenter Jamila Rizvi told him: “I know I speak for every Australian when we say we’re so sorry that your daughter came to visit us and we didn’t take better care of her.” Following Christchurch, ashamed Australians are apologizing personally to New Zealanders on Twitter.
But what has become clear is that the shame—and the apologies—are no longer enough.
White Australians must no longer tolerate those mainstream voices who give white supremacy a platform and megaphone. Instead of brushing aside the racism in our homeland, or pointing instead toward Trump and the United States, we must call out dog whistles in our own government, in our own backyard, every chance we get. We must condemn hate speech not just when someone like Anning goes “too far,” and we must deny visas to alt-right figures who come to our shores expecting a friendly welcome not just in the wake of right-wing terror attacks, but always. We must fight the normalization of Islamophobia. And above all we must accept responsibility for the hatred we have normalized. Rather than go easy on ourselves, we must go hard. “Resist the urge to blame,” wrote Quillette founder Claire Lehmann. On the contrary, this is exactly when we need to be assigning more blame and scrutinizing the racist swamp from which Tarrant emerged. And we should be wary of those, like Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton, who would protest this as “politicization.” Jess Dweck satirized this kind of response as: “Please don’t bring politics into this tragedy in which the perpetrator was clearly inspired by my politics.”
You might think that this is all too strong, that placing at least some of the blame on white Australia is a kind of self-centered masochism, that blaming a nation’s culture for the sins of a citizen is like blaming humanity for the crimes of one man. But it’s better than the alternative, of saying “#notallAustralians” and looking the other way, thinking, well, there’s nothing I can do.
White Australians may not be strictly answerable for Tarrant’s crime, but we have some big questions to ask ourselves. If you’re an Australian and reading this makes you feel defensive, you should ask them now.
Remember when we used to treat people who hallucinated?
Dakmar posted on 2019-04-02 22:10:20 Reply Private Reply
#3: James Deffenbach To: Dakmar (#2)
I wonder where his crocodile tears were for all the Christians who have been slaughtered by Muslims. Dumb bastard.
James Deffenbach posted on 2019-04-03 00:30:09 Reply Private Reply
#4: GreyLmist To: Dakmar, *Music Club* (#2)
GreyLmist posted on 2019-04-03 13:43:42 Reply Private Reply
#5: Dakmar To: James Deffenbach (#3)
Dakmar posted on 2019-04-03 20:44:41 Reply Private Reply
#6: Dakmar To: GreyLmist (#4)
Pretty much. Confiscate all property for the benefit of the party elites. It's been said Stalin was the wealthiest person ever, the entire Soviet Union belonged to him.
Dakmar posted on 2019-04-03 20:50:27 Reply Private Reply
#7: BTP Holdings To: Dakmar (#6)
Not only that but he held the power of life and death over everyone. Stalin was extremely paranoid and frequently used body doubles at public events.
Hitler, on the other hand, used only one body double. It was a cousin of his who looked much like Adolph. His body was burned at the Fuhrer Bunker to hide the fact the Hitler had escaped to Spain.
I know this for a fact since I have read the Gestapo Chief books by Gregory Douglas. Heinrich Mueller escaped to Switzerland at the end of the war. U.S. representatives went there to interview him in 1946.
When they asked him about Hitler he replied, "You could try Spain." Then he elaborated, "Maybe the Russians could go to Barcelona and ask Franco about him. They might end up buried in an orange grove." Then he added, "And if you went there you might end up in the next orange grove over."
They brought Mueller to the United States, gave him a rank of Major in the U.S. Army and he played the piano for Harry Truman.
The reason Mueller was brought here is because his specialty was Soviet Counter- intelligence. And we all know where the Soviet Union is today. ;)
BTP Holdings posted on 2019-04-03 21:55:44 Reply Private Reply
#8: James Deffenbach To: Dakmar (#5)
You got that right.
James Deffenbach posted on 2019-04-04 00:28:54 Reply Private Reply