WE DID IT: Tulsi Hit the Donation Mark! In the Debates! Jews on Suicide Watch!

Source: https://dailystormer.name/we-did-it-tulsi-hit-the-donation-mark-in-the-debates-jews-on-suicide-watch/
Published: Apr 11, 2019
Author: Andrew Anglin
Post Date: 2019-04-11 08:46:08 by Ada
Views: 830

Good job, lads.

We got Tulsi in the debates.

I kind of didn’t really want to do the whole big push on this site and have her linked to us if she was going to make it without us (both because I don’t want the media attention and I doubt she wants to be considered a nazi candidate), but as it was clear she wasn’t going to make it without us, I figured it didn’t matter.

The media kikes are already ready taking note.

Get ready for maximum overload kvetching.

If anyone wants to get involved with a candidate’s campaign, join the Tulsi campaign. Or Yang.

In Tulsi’s campaign, you could talk about Jews starting all the wars, whereas in Yang’s campaign, you would be talking about how low-skilled immigrants are a nonsensical thing as we’re entering the age of robots.

Both of these candidates have issues that we care about, and that is what we need to start dealing with – issues, rather than candidates. The savior candidate thing failed totally with Trump, so now it’s time to go issue by issue, and just try to get any part of our agenda through that we can as the American system collapses around us.

As we saw with the White Nationalism hearing this week, basically our entire government is now run by Jews and brown people and the few whites that remain refuse to stand up for white interests beyond a timid defense fo the First Amendment. They are also openly attacking the Founding Fathers as evil racists.

They openly admitted that we are the inheritors of the legacy of the Founding Fathers. That we are the American people and that they are something alien that has come in and taken over our government to take our country from us.

So we have to start thinking of ourselves as a nation without a state.

We are operating within the national borders of our former nation-state, and the goal now is to work to create a new state by any means necessary.

This is going to involve politics, but not in the normal way of simply electing a leader to represent our interests. Our focus needs to be getting people to disconnect from the Zionist Occupation Government and embrace the reality that we are now prisoners of an international marketplace. We have to use the political system to rally people around the stateless nation of White America.

And infiltrating politics is the best way to get this done. Infiltrate everywhere and plant the seeds, get people on our side, move things forward.

We are on the cusp of an almost completely nonwhite government, and a majority nonwhite nation. But that also means that we are on the cusp of the large mass of people accepting the reality that our country has been stolen out from under us and that we now are a people without a state.

The boldness with which they are now attacking Thomas Jefferson and others of our Founding Fathers is going to make this relatively easy for most “conservative” types, especially when Trump is out and as the boomers die off. So focusing on getting to more liberal-type whites should be a priority.

I am going to work on fleshing out the idea of “people without a state” in simple meme terms.

Meanwhile, you all infiltrate these campaigns.

Be sly.

Don’t ever give yourself away as right wing.

You know all the talking points of the left, so acknowledge the various platitudes as you push specific targeted talking points.

Post Comment   Private Reply

#1: Horse    To: Ada (#0)

My favorite Tulsi photo was not to be found. This is my second favorite. It was at Veterans Today.

Tulsi Says Trump and Pence Suck al Qaeda Tush

Horse posted on 2019-04-11 11:41:20   Reply   Private Reply

#2: Ada    To: Horse (#1)

Tulsi Says Trump and Pence Suck al Qaeda Tush

She be wrong. Al Qaeda are simply shabbos goys.

Ada posted on 2019-04-11 12:41:49   Reply   Private Reply

#3: X-15    To: Ada, *Shooters* (#0)

LoLoLoLoL!!!!!!!!!!!!

gabbard.house.gov/gun- control

Tulsi is working to increase school security, shore up and reform our mental healthcare system, close the gun show and online loopholes, ban military- style assault weapons and bump stocks, and require background checks on anyone seeking to purchase a gun. She has cosponsored legislation like the Gun Show Loophole Closing Act, the Public Safety and Second Amendment Rights Act, the Keeping Guns from High Risk Individuals Act, the Assault Weapons Ban, the Support Assault Firearms Elimination and Reduction for our Streets Act, the Domestic Violence Loophole Closure Act, the Automatic Gunfire Prevention Act, the Gun Violence Research Act, and more.

X-15 posted on 2019-04-11 13:06:06   Reply   Private Reply

#4: Original_Intent    To: X-15 (#3)

Tulsi, despite her other good attributes, is a delusional gun grabber at war with individual liberty - as reinforced by the Second Amendment.

I would support Tulsi sometime after hell freezes over.

Original_Intent posted on 2019-04-11 14:12:24   Reply   Private Reply

#5: X-15    To: Original_Intent (#4)

She could hand out lollipops and blowjobs and I'd still kick her to the curb for her whacked-out views on the right of people to be armed.

X-15 posted on 2019-04-11 17:37:43   Reply   Private Reply

#6: Rotara    To: Original_Intent (#4)

😱

Rotara posted on 2019-04-11 18:24:41   Reply   Private Reply

#7: Original_Intent    To: X-15 (#5)

She could hand out lollipops and blowjobs and I'd still kick her to the curb for her whacked-out views on the right of people to be armed.

Nicely put. Concur.

Original_Intent posted on 2019-04-11 19:19:14   Reply   Private Reply

#8: Original_Intent    To: Rotara (#6)

Just thought I would pop in and say hello. Hello. :-)

Original_Intent posted on 2019-04-11 19:20:17   Reply   Private Reply

#9: GreyLmist    To: Ada (#0)

They openly admitted that we are the inheritors of the legacy of the Founding Fathers. That we are the American people and that they are something alien that has come in and taken over our government to take our country from us.

So we have to start thinking of ourselves as a nation without a state.


Wrong. They are hostile Foreign Agent battalions without a nation state here who are trying to take over ours by PsyOp, etc. So, American Constitutionalists should think more about 3rd Amendment judicious proceedings to evict, incarcerate and deport them:

No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

GreyLmist posted on 2019-04-11 19:49:52   Reply   Private Reply

#10: Lod    To: GreyLmist (#9)

Great take: I like your thinking on this invasion. Thank you.

Lod posted on 2019-04-11 20:04:00   Reply   Private Reply

#11: GreyLmist    To: Lod, Original_Intent (#10)

You're welcome, Lod, and thanks for your affirmation about the 3rd Amendment route. :)

Waving to OI ~

GreyLmist posted on 2019-04-11 20:50:47   Reply   Private Reply

#12: Original_Intent    To: GreyLmist (#11)

Waving back - with big smile.

Original_Intent posted on 2019-04-13 01:22:57   Reply   Private Reply

#13: Prefrontal Vortex    To: Ada (#0)

Yang-Gabbard 2020. That would get my vote.

Prefrontal Vortex posted on 2019-05-16 22:17:52   Reply   Private Reply

#14: Lod    To: GreyLmist, 4 (#11)

Trump may go the insurrection route

President Donald Trump is planning on using the Insurrection Act to remove illegal immigrants from the United States, The Daily Caller has learned.

According to multiple senior administration officials, the president intends to invoke the “tremendous powers” of the act to remove illegal immigrants from the country.

“We’re doing the Insurrection Act,” one official said.

Under the Insurrection Act of 1807, the president has the authority to use the National Guard and military in order to combat “unlawful obstruction or rebellion” within U.S. borders. The act was last invoked in 1992 by George H.W. Bush to quell the Los Angeles riots, and was also used by Eisenhower in 1957 to enforce school desegregation in the south.

Lod posted on 2019-05-16 23:00:43   Reply   Private Reply

#15: GreyLmist    To: Lod (#14)

Trump may go the insurrection route

Trump Plans To Invoke Insurrection Act To Boot Illegal Immigrants | The Daily Caller | 05/16/2019

President Donald Trump is planning on using the Insurrection Act to remove illegal immigrants from the United States, The Daily Caller has learned.

According to multiple senior administration officials, the president intends to invoke the “tremendous powers” of the act to remove illegal immigrants from the country.

“We’re doing the Insurrection Act,” one official said.

Under the Insurrection Act of 1807, the president has the authority to use the National Guard and military in order to combat “unlawful obstruction or rebellion” within U.S. borders. The act was last invoked in 1992 by George H.W. Bush to quell the Los Angeles riots, and was also used by Eisenhower in 1957 to enforce school desegregation in the south.


Thanks for that info, Lod. Added a link for the source and links at paragraph 4 as they appear in the article. This is for the first link of that paragraph, which says: "Insurrection Act of 1807" but displays as:

10 U.S. Code § 252 - Use of militia and armed forces to enforce Federal authority | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may call into Federal service such of the militia of any State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 15, § 332; Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title X, § 1057(a)(2), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3440; renumbered § 252, Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title XII, § 1241(a)(2), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2497.)


This is about the second link at paragraph 4 of the Daily Caller excerpts (linked above in the quote section), which says: "last invoked" and displays an article at justsecurity.org. That article is problematic, imo, and it's the usual obfuscating spin about the Posse Comitatus Act (as if America isn't allowed to have a U.S. Military to defend our own borders from foreign invasion leagues cuz they're supposedly restricted here by the PCA to just acting as indirect support for law enforcement agencies -- i.e. like we can only depend mostly on the very same agencies that couldn't or wouldn't do their jobs sufficiently as national security guards of our border and immigration laws). The problematic issue is this:

The "justsecurity.org" article contains a more expansive link that says "Insurrection Act" there but I think it's the wrong link [which goes to: 10 U.S. Code CHAPTER 15—MILITARY SUPPORT FOR CIVILIAN LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES for § 271-§ 284 -- nothing there for § 252, as quoted above]. This excerpt only provided an abbreviated version of the most relevant content at #2 and I'm not sure where they got the preceeding section at #1:

The Insurrection Act, dating from 1807, warrants the most scrutiny. This law authorizes the President to use the armed forces to enforce the law when:

1. there is an insurrection within a state, and the state legislature (or governor if the state legislature cannot be convened) requests assistance; or

2. the “President considers that unlawful obstructions ... assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States [...] by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings.” [...]


Missing text there can be read at the 10 U.S. Code § 252 example presented first in this post. This Wikipedia source for the Insurrection Act lists a link for §§ 251–255: 10 U.S. Code Chapter 13 – INSURRECTION


I'm thinking we should build a border-spanning Military base.

GreyLmist posted on 2019-06-10 01:48:34   Reply   Private Reply