
Author says results highlight problem of transprejudice
A new study which found that only 3 per cent of heterosexuals were willing to date a transgender person proves society has a problem with transprejudice and must be re-educated, according to its author.
In the study, which was published in the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, participants were asked to check which of the following they would consider as a potential dating partner.
a cisgender woman
a cisgender man
a transgender woman
a transgender man
a person with a non-binary gender identification
The study found that only 3.1 per cent of heterosexuals were willing to date a trans person compared to 55 per cent of people with queer or bisexual sexual orientations.
According to its author Karen L. Blair Ph.D., the results showed that many heterosexuals rejected dating trans people because they thought they had make believe identities and that this is a form of transprejudice.
These types of responses questioned the legitimacy of transgender and non-binary identities and took a very dehumanizing tone in referring to trans people, writes Blair, noting that even people who rejected trans partners because they mentioned a desire to only date people with whom they could have biologically related children did so using dehumanizing language, such as saying that a trans man was not a natural man or a real man.
Blair said that such dehumanization and transprejudice could be combated with more education about the diversity of gender identities and by increasing accurate media representations of trans and non-binary people.
The author notes that the same type of prejudice doesnt exist when it comes to dating people of a different race.
There definitely appears to be some kind of innate stigma that straight people have towards transgenders when it comes to having romantic and possibly sexual relationships with them.
Some transgender commentators have previously asserted that it is bigoted for heterosexuals to choose not to date transgenders.
Is this really something that can be changed with enough re-education and social engineering, or is it a completely normal preference to hold?
Poster Comment:
Surprised that as many as 3% would date a transgender thing. Maybe not on 4UM.
#1: Lod To: Horse (#0)
Lod posted on 2019-06-17 10:36:08 Reply Private Reply
#2: ghostdogtxn To: Lod (#1)
ghostdogtxn posted on 2019-06-17 11:06:32 Reply Private Reply
#3: Pinguinite To: Horse (#0)
If they propose to be able to fix such preferences in straight people, why do they say they cannot fix it in gay people?
Pinguinite posted on 2019-06-17 12:57:10 Reply Private Reply
#4: TommyTheMadArtist To: Pinguinite (#3)
TommyTheMadArtist posted on 2019-06-17 14:20:58 Reply Private Reply
#5: noone222 To: Pinguinite (#3)
Great analysis !
noone222 posted on 2019-06-17 14:56:09 Reply Private Reply
#6: BTP Holdings To: Pinguinite (#3)
When I worked for the State of Illinois, I was in the Brothers Tavern after work for a couple of beers. This guy came on the TV news. It was one of the designers from the florist shop I used to do deliveries for as a young man. It seems he had found his long, lost brother.
I stood up on the rungs of the bar stool, pointed at the TV and shouted, "THAT GUY'S A FAGGOT!"
Everyone was saying, "How do you know?"
I told them, "I used to work with the guy. It was in the same shop, but we had different jobs."
That place closed in 1998 and the corporation was disbanded. I wonder who the Joos are using now for weddings and Bar Mitzvah's?
After all, the owner was a millionaire already in the early 80s. ;)
BTP Holdings posted on 2019-06-17 16:41:11 Reply Private Reply
#7: TommyTheMadArtist To: Horse (#0)
With the whole 437 genders, these morons want to make themselves more interesting sounding than they really are. Jesus Christ I wish people would read books or something to have something else to talk about.
TommyTheMadArtist posted on 2019-06-18 06:11:41 Reply Private Reply