Media And Public Disagree On Tulsi Gabbard's Debate Performance

The mainstream media seem to judge the Democratic primary debate last night quite differently than the general public.

Quartz cites multiple polls which show that Tulsi Gabbard won the debate:

[T]wo candidates seemed to pique a lot of interest among US voters, at least when judged by who Americans searched for on Google: New Jersey senator Cory Booker and Hawaii Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard.

A poll by the right-leaning Drudge Report also found Gabbard to be the breakout of the debate with 38% of the vote, well ahead of Massachusetts senator Elizabeth Warren in second place. Gabbard also topped polls by local news sites including NJ.com and the Washington Examiner.

Now contrast that with the mainstream media.

The Washington Post discusses winners and losers of the debate and puts Gabbard in the second category:

Gabbard was lost for much of the debate. That may not have been her fault — she wasn’t asked many questions — ....

Duh!

The New York Times main piece about the debate mentions Gabbard only once - in paragraph 32 of the 45 paragraphs long piece. It does not reveal anything about her actual political position:

There was little discussion of foreign policy until near the end of the debate when two little-known House lawmakers, Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii and Tim Ryan of Ohio, clashed over how aggressively to target the Taliban.

The New York Times also has some 'experts' discussing winners and losers. Gabbard is only mentioned at the very end, and by a Republican pollster, as a potential candidate for Secretary of Defense.

CNN also discusses winners and losers. Gabbard is not mentioned at all.

NBC News ranks the candidates' performance. It puts Gabbard on place 8 and inserts a snide:

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, D-Hawaii: Seized an opportunity to highlight her military experience in Afghanistan and her signature anti-intervention foreign policy views, without being tainted by her past sympathetic comments on Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad.

Most of the above media have long avoided to mention Gabbard and to discuss her political positions. It is quite evident that the mainstream media do not like her anti-regime-change views and are afraid of even writing about them.

Tulsi Gabbard's campaign posted a video of her parts of the debate. She received some good applause.

---

Tulsi Gabbard Full Debate Performance | First 2020 Primary Debate Highlights

Thanks.

Easy to see why people liked those answers to those questions. I did, and she seems to have a force of presence that most of the other mullets do not have.

Tulsi Gabbard has broken the ice – she has brought up Netanyahu, Saudi, Bolton, and Pompeo as enemies of peace.

The big question is will anyone have the courage to second her?

she has brought up Netanyahu, Saudi, Bolton, and Pompeo as enemies of peace.

Netanjoohoo is definitely an enemy of peace.

So are the Saudis. Apparently they have acquired nuclear technology from the Pakistanis. The Paki's are one of the few who hold nukes that are not signatories to the Non Proliferation Treaty.

Then there is the Uber-Neocon John Bolton. Anything he does or says is proof he is an Israelophile.

Pompeo I do not know too much about. But since Tulsi brought him up I imagine she has the scoop on him too. ;)