Another Major Part of the Whistleblower Memo Called out as False
Posted at 10:00 pm on September 27, 2019 by Nick Arama
The whistleblower complaint imploded big time yesterday when part of it was specifically called out as false by a senior government official, according to Christina Ruffini, the State Department and Foreign Affairs Reporter for CBS News.
twitter.com/EenaRuffini/status/1177307225024544768
Another problem in the story also emerged, according to Fox.
"[A]ccording to the whistleblower complaint, by mid-May, U.S. diplomat Kurt Volker sought to contain the damage from Trump attorney Rudy Giulianis outreach to Ukraine.
"But a July 19 text message conversation from Volker to Giuliani, provided to Fox News on Thursday, showed that Volker had in fact encouraged Giuliani to reach out to Ukraine even sending Giuliani a message reading, connecting you here with Andrey Yermak, who is very close to President Zelensky.
"Additionally, the complaint said Trump suggested that Mr. Zelensky might want to keep his current prosecutor general, a claim not supported by the transcript."
There were of course other things wrong with the claim to begin with, such as the claim that there was a quid pro quo offered when there was none, as the transcript shows. Ukraine has also made it clear that they did not in any way feel pressured in the phone call, despite the whistleblower saying differently. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said it was a normal call and no one pushed me.
But now theres even more.
The whistleblower complained that there was nothing at all sensitive in the call. So that there was no justification for thereafter secure storage system in the NSC. The argument was that Trump just didnt want people to hear the conversation.
As it turns out, thats also wrong, as Undercover Huber notes in a great Twitter thread.
#1: Lod To: BTP Holdings (#0)
Lod posted on 2019-09-29 18:05:43 Reply Private Reply
#2: BTP Holdings To: Lod (#1)
ROTFLOL I simply post them for comments. ;)
BTP Holdings posted on 2019-09-29 18:09:55 Reply Private Reply
#3: Pinguinite To: Lod (#1)
Pinguinite posted on 2019-09-30 02:26:20 Reply Private Reply