Food for Thought

Source: http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/
Published: Jan 24, 2020
Author: Mike Rivero
Post Date: 2020-01-24 19:44:47 by Horse
Views: 741

"If my sons did not want wars, there would be none." -- Gutle Schnaper Rothschild

Post Comment   Private Reply

#1: NeoconsNailed    To: Horse (#0)

'Gutle Schnaper Rothschild' -- these NAMES! >;-D >;-D >;-D

NeoconsNailed posted on 2020-01-24 19:45:56   Reply   Private Reply

#2: Ada    To: Horse, neoconsnailed (#0)

Have you heard anything more about Rivero's health?

Ada posted on 2020-01-24 19:54:36   Reply   Private Reply

#3: Horse    To: Ada (#2)

Not yet. Still undiagnosed.

Horse posted on 2020-01-24 20:04:36   Reply   Private Reply

#4: Anthem    To: Horse (#0)

Has this "quote" been verified? If so, by whom, when, where, and how.

(Real) Journalism 101.

Anthem posted on 2020-01-24 21:32:34   Reply   Private Reply

#5: Horse    To: Anthem (#4)

I have heard it many times.

Horse posted on 2020-01-24 22:00:42   Reply   Private Reply

#6: Lod    To: Anthem (#4)

Search for the quote, there are scores of references out there, many with other interesting "banking" information.

Lod posted on 2020-01-24 22:08:14   Reply   Private Reply

#7: FormerLurker    To: Anthem (#4)

Couldn't bother looking it up yourself, eh slick?

FormerLurker posted on 2020-01-24 22:13:24   Reply   Private Reply

#8: NeoconsNailed    To: Horse, All (#3)

Stadmiller said on Friday's show that Mike is looking a lot better and will likely return to the microphone Monday.

John's show is really, really good too -- everybody check it out!

www.republicbroadcastinga...ategory/john-stadtmiller/

NeoconsNailed posted on 2020-01-25 03:26:36   Reply   Private Reply

#9: Anthem    To: Lod (#6)

Search for the quote, there are scores of references out there, many with other interesting "banking" information.

Of course there are. Any and all anti-Zionist anti-Rothschild sites are likely to have it, unless they are like me and want some convincing evidence that it was actually said. Who heard it and reported it to what publisher? I doubt that information will emerge with a creditable pedigree.

Quotes like this that are so easily challenged do nothing to further the cause of freedom. Even though there is some basis for the quote, it is itself a strawman. Better to trace and publish the source of government financing, as Lincoln attempted to do.

Anthem posted on 2020-02-13 12:01:15   Reply   Private Reply

#10: Anthem    To: Horse (#5)

flag to #9 above

Anthem posted on 2020-02-13 12:03:13   Reply   Private Reply

#11: Lod    To: Anthem (#9)

Apologies, but I don't have the time nor interest to try and vett any quote from the nineteenth century.

Lod posted on 2020-02-13 12:13:59   Reply   Private Reply

#12: Anthem    To: Lod (#11)

Understood; neither do I. Nor do I give it any credence.

Anthem posted on 2020-02-13 13:03:42   Reply   Private Reply

#13: Horse    To: FormerLurker, Lod, Anthem (#7)

Horse posted on 2020-02-13 13:08:54   Reply   Private Reply

#14: Anthem    To: Horse (#13)

It is not enough to claim there is evidence, the evidence must be presented. Otherwise it is a "crackpot" claim.

Anthem posted on 2020-02-13 15:44:37   Reply   Private Reply

#15: Esso    To: Anthem, 4um (#14)

It is not enough to claim there is evidence, the evidence must be presented.

Maybe, but even with the whole world of information at my fingertips (internet), I am finding it harder to determine the truth than I did 50+ years ago. I guess that sometimes we'll just have to trust our God-given senses. Seeing is believing, I think the saying goes.

Otherwise it is a "crackpot" claim.

I thought the whole gender issue was solved with the discovery of DNA and the XX and XY chromosome deal. Even with Down's Syndrome, and the extra X or Y chromosome, gender is still pretty straight forward. Penis or vagina in 99.99% of folks.

Now they're saying there's a whole bunch of "new genders." Where's the "truth" in that nonsense? Maybe that's why they call it nonsense, because people aren't using their senses.

I could be wrong, JMO.

Esso posted on 2020-02-13 16:29:28   Reply   Private Reply

#16: BTP Holdings    To: Esso (#15)

gender is still pretty straight forward. Penis or vagina in 99.99% of folks

Yep. And then there is that really tiny fraction that have both penis and mammary glands. ;)

BTP Holdings posted on 2020-02-14 07:38:37   Reply   Private Reply

#17: Anthem    To: Esso (#15)

Bit of a strange leap. There is plenty of evidence that there are only two sexes, easily presented.

The word gender used to be used primarily as an indicator for inanimate objects that fit together. Now it appears to be used to euphemistically label psychological problems related to sexuality.

Anthem posted on 2020-02-14 12:50:12   Reply   Private Reply