The spinning "Globe" Earth is the actual "conspiracy".
The actual truth: The Earth is a stationary plane.
Careful now. This awesome documentary is 25 minutes worth of concentrated Red-Pill truth.
Or...ignore it. Don't watch. OR...don't bother watching the first few minutes, give up only to go ahead and swallow the Blue-Pill once again. "They" prefer this be the case.
There is no Purple-Pill compromise.
#1: Liberator To: All (#0)
There are very few who criticize the content. BECAUSE...it is irrefutable.
Who ya gonna believe??
Weathermen, media, and "scientists" telling you what you see is a "mirage" (when it's obviously NOT?); Neil deGrasse Tyson and Bill Nye, who discredit themselves by speaking out of three sides of their mouth (as NO ONE calls them out)?; NASA and SpaceX as they perform like bad CGI magicians and circus animals -- yet calling it "Science"?
It's time not only to question past voodoo "Science," theoretical magic numbers and formulas; Mandela-Effect TV "history" and books; It's time to challenge these liars and their cheesy special FX and reject the non-stop theater.
PROVEN: A "spinning-Globe" DOES NOT EXIST.
Liberator posted on 2020-02-23 14:06:12 Reply Private Reply
#2: Liberator To: NASA Scientific Visualization Studios (#1)
That's right. NASA requires an ENTIRE ART Studio to catapult its propaganda. Actual Photos?? NOT ACTUALLY NECESSARY.
This tool is called, the 'Scientific Visualization Studios' https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/Gallery/index.html
You'll find "images," "simulations," "holograms,"...but few actual PHOTOS. Of course you'll find MANY "weather" images, because somehow that's become NASA's most important "mission."
And don't forget to check out the subject matter by category.
There is a Gallery, 'The Moon's South Pole'. But not one on the EARTH'S Antarctica or 'South Pole.'
Yes, you'll find "Landsat" (Land Satellite) Images. "Radarsat". "Animation." But no actual Images of Antarctica from "Spacesats" (Space Satellites)
Does anyone find this oddity deliciously ironic??
Liberator posted on 2020-02-23 14:23:25 Reply Private Reply
#3: Liberator To: 4 (#1)
"REAL" Images claims. NASA can well afford a "Visualization Studio" given their $52 million per day budget.
Yup. THAT is the sun you "see." AND the "Planets." AND "Outer Space." *cough* (Still ZERO photos from any Satellite of our own Earth and Antarctica. I guess it's not as exotic or exciting.)
At 10:15 is Pluto...But...but...the satellite zoomed in soooo close!
Uh-oh...hmmm....But what's that stamp to the left say in fine-print?:
"NASA NAIG Concept..." Nevermind.
"Mars Rover"?? smh
Come on, man...
Wait...Finally near the end, NASA Visualization Studio tosses a reality bone. An actual, believable "REAL" photo at 10:47 of an actual star. As though taken from a telescope or Nikon 1000.
NASA: $52 million per day. Below: NASA Visualization Studio vids. showcases 'Earthrise: The 45th Anniversary'.
Right. Let's celebrate the SIX lunar landings missions with that ONE & ONLY photo)
Liberator posted on 2020-02-23 14:41:35 Reply Private Reply