There are so many things impossibly wrong with this supposed "Mars" project, video, landscape, horizon -- yes, this entire theater.

Many comments at YouTube: "I can't believe we are on another planet!"

Yes, and for good reason: WE AREN'T. It's impossible for too many reasons.

Even if one assumes the Mars Rover to be real; Why are there still nothing but blurry "photos" and "video" of and on the moon? Why are there nothing but fake, different "photos" of the Earth from the Moon?

WHY is NO "Moon-Rover" camera set up on the Moon? NO detailed video shots of IT? (and no, there are no mythical "mirrors" set up on the Moon given its coincidental reflective qualities.)

And...WHY is there NO detailed video of the interior of our own unexplored Antarctica?

Yet... we-the-pods are to fully believe NASA (who is coincidentally overseeing "Climate Change" and Chemtrailing projects here on Earth) have managed not only to send a space ship to Mars, but land the craft safely, set up a Land-Rover for months/years... then start clicking super-clear video from a landscape that looks suspiciously like EARTH.

Literally UN-BELIEVABLE.

*quad-quadruple eyeball roll*

Why doesn't NASA set up a Moon-Rover to snap this very same super-detailed 1.8 Billion-Pixel panorama video of Moon landscape...AND ALSO PLANET EARTH IN REAL TIME??

"NOPE, it's too inhospitable, too vast, too hard. And besides, nothing to see -- MOVE ALONG."

Explore Mars, a supposed planet in supposed "outer-space" (outside The Firmament) that is supposedly 140,000,000 MILLION miles away:

"Piece of cake. HOLD MUH BEER."

(and no, there are no mythical "mirrors" set up on the Moon given its coincidental reflective qualities.)

You are another doubting Thomas on the moon landings too.

Do you know what Neil and Buzz left on the moon in 1969? ;)

en.w ikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Laser_Ranging_experiment

The moon landings though? Total hoax. The Mars rovers? Likely hoax. Space....

We can achieve low earth orbit. We got a flipping space station up there we lie to the public about. I mean it's up there but we are not sending football jerseys to space for superbowl. The fuel waste would be inexcusable

Space travel is all about the cold equations. Math don't will not change for pc policies or to save a life. Once the fuel is spent that's it. And the van Allen radiation belts have an inner and outer belt and the outer belt is worst than the first.

The moon hoax is a hoax.

The Mars rovers are also most likely fake.

You are another doubting Thomas on the moon landings too.

I have no "doubts" at all.

It was/ forever Mission-Impossible to the nth degree :-)

Yes, I am familiar with Buzz and the supposed set up of parabolic mirrors on the Moon.

When all else fails, it is THIS alleged "proof" on which all True Believers must now hang their hat: "SEE!?? WE REALLY WENT! MIRRORS WERE LEFT ON THE MOON!!"

Unfortunately, like all the other "Moon Landing proof," this is just more wishful thinking and pure bunk.

COMMON SENSE: Wouldn't it be MUCH simpler for NASA to land another "Lander" on the Moon, then merely set up a hi-def camera and point it at Earth in real time?? But no, NASA didn't do that in any of their alleged 5 Moon landings. OR made one single subsequent future trip since 1972.

What we are NOT told:

The Moon's material is reflective plasma. Folks supposedly bounce lasers off of the lunar surface (Buzz's "mirrors.") It provides great cover for the "Moon Landings."

I'll post a link when I get a chance.

Do you believe in the realm of "outer space" and it's "trillions" of "Light Years"?

Q: If the earth is "round", which "formulas" and "math" are to be cited as proof? (just asking)

NASA says it no longer possesses the technology to land on the moon again.

Since the Titan V rocket was merely five V-2 rockets strapped together to give enough boost to break free of Earth's gravity. We can see how all of this works.

I will be happy to see the link you might post. I looked up that Professor and he claims the moon is made up of plasma and cannot be landed upon.

Maybe we should discount the Chinese rover that has made it to the moon too. ;)

Q: If the earth is "round", which "formulas" and "math" are to be cited as proof? (just asking)

Remember they told Christopher Columbus if he sailed west he would fall off the edge of the Earth.

He landed on the island of San Salvador in the Bahamas.

Columbus thought he had sailed to the far east but had in fact landed in what was to become the New World. Spain laid claim to Florida originally and much of the other lands in Central and South America. Many Spanish Galions went to the bottom during those storms when loaded with gold dubloons.

In California the Span ish Missions brought Christianity to the west coast of North America. ;)

The moon hoax is a hoax.

The Mars rovers are also most likely fake.

Nah. The moon landings were for real.

Mars rover is likely for real too. ;)

Nah. The moon landings were for real.

Mars rover is likely for real too. ;)

How much have you really read into the incredible radiation captured into the van Allen belts and the distances of interstellar space in between the earth and the moon.

I'm telling you, my grand pa Cunningham was a part of the appolo program. Dropping the capsules in the ocean for testing. Also flew the SR 71 while it was in service.

Some folks will believe anything especially if it's repeated over and over again with out ever looking at the facts of the matter. Humans are very VERY gullible. The moon landings are fake. The van Allen belts are real.

Q: If the earth is "round", which "formulas" and "math" are to be cited as proof? (just asking)

The old formula for line of sight distance is off. That formula is a few centuries old. The earth has expanded a bit since then. The numbers need to be adjusted for natural earth expansion.

As for outer space and what not, yes I believe that's real. Do I think we have done better than low earth orbit? I'll need to see the lead lined space vehicle first.

The van Allen belts are real.

Yes I am aware of the van Allen belts.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Allen_radiation_belt

Your Grandpa must have been high ranking in Air Force to fly the SR-71. ;)

Some folks will believe anything especially if it's repeated over and over again with out ever looking at the facts of the matter. Humans are very VERY gullible.

That much is all too true.

The moon landings are fake.

As one who does not trust the gov, I'll say I've seen no compelling evidence or arguments against the moon landings, and I've thoughtfully considered a number of them.

The van Allen belts are real.

Yes they are. But they were not a show stopper for the moon trips. They can be largely avoided by exiting earth orbit at a high enough latitude away from the Equator, and effects further minimized by spending a minimal amount of time in it, both of which NASA had control over with the Apollo missions.

Your Grandpa must have been high ranking in Air Force to fly the SR-71. ;)

Lt. Col.

One of the first drafted into the army air corps before it was transitioned into the air force.

images.app.goo.gl/YsrdkrSXkuyBdgVk6

... do you know how they would keep so many quiet?

They'd never tell them that it was just another simulation run but rather let them all think it was a real run this time. And with those that knew the truth... well as my grand pa always said, he could tell you , but then he'd have to kill you.

Of course he drink like a fish too in retirement so sometimes , a liqured up tounge let the truth slip.

he could tell you , but then he'd have to kill you.

Secrets were only secrets if you did not run your mouth about what went on. ;)

And...WHY is there NO detailed video of the interior of our own unexplored Antarctica?

Ever figure out how to do a web search? Let me help..

http://duckduckgo.com/?q=antarct...98-1&ia=images&iax=images

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_mCHs79B6c

BTW, Antarctica is NOT unexplored.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Antarctica

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Antarctica

From the link:

Norwegian Roald Amundsen finally reached the Pole on 13 December 1911

There is an Amundsen High School in Chicago on north side. That is where I had my driver education classes.

We were practicing parallel parking. This one girl cut the wheels and looked over her shoulder. She forgot to put the car in reverse and crashed the car. They flunked her for that one. LOL

You should write a book, BTP.

I am very lucky to remember anything from the past since the meningitis wiped out so much of my memory. ;)

Explore Mars, a supposed planet in supposed "outer-space" (outside The Firmament) that is supposedly 140,000,000 MILLION miles away:

There is no "Firmament" as you believe. The original meaning of the word suggested the idea of an "expanse".

The expanse would most certainly include the entire Universe.