Debunking Nature Magazine’s “COVID-19 Definitely Didn’t Come From A Lab” China Propaganda

Source: https://rawconservativeopinions.com/2020/03/21/debunking-nature-magazine-s-covid-19-definitely-didn-t-come-from-a-lab-china-propaganda/
Published: Mar 21, 2020
Author: staff
Post Date: 2020-03-21 20:53:41 by BTP Holdings
Views: 448

Debunking Nature Magazine’s “COVID-19 Definitely Didn’t Come From A Lab” China Propaganda

March 21, 2020

Maybe you shouldn’t blindly believe everything you read? Even if the source has a pretty solid reputation?

Nature magazine has censored over 1,000 articles at the request of the Chinese government over the past several years. And it seems pretty clear that their recent article, “The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 is just one more example of their influence.

China bought off the head of Harvard’s chemistry department, you don’t think they could buy off run-of-the-mill research scientists scrambling for tenure and funding and publication? It’s absolutely horrific that so many scientists and researchers are taking part in what’s really clearly a disinformation campaign orchestrated by the Chinese Communist Party, and willfully spreading a smokescreen about something that’s already killed thousands and is projected to kill millions more across the planet.

And while the mainstream corporate media mindlessly regurgitates claims from the Chinese government that are falsifiable with the simplest of google searches, allowing the public to be lulled into a false sense of security and complacency, and Reddit rapidly censors and moderates anything that might indicate that this virus leaked from a Chinese lab and so the Chinese government is to blame for this pandemic – sites like ZeroHedge, that have been at the forefront of keeping the lines of investigation open, have been banished from Twitter and marginalized.

Below is a takedown of that article, and the good news is a much more nuanced and honest look at the origins of COVID-19, the Wuhan Strain of coronavirus is just a click away.

Thus, the high-affinity binding of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein to human ACE2 is most likely the result of natural selection on a human or human-like ACE2 that permits another optimal binding solution to arise. This is strong evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is not the product of purposeful manipulation.

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply

#1: NeoconsNailed    To: BTP Holdings (#0)

I'm sure Nature mag is as jewed as the giant nature orgs.

NeoconsNailed posted on 2020-03-21 21:28:49   Reply   Private Reply


#2: BTP Holdings    To: NeoconsNailed (#1)

I'm sure Nature mag is as jewed as the giant nature orgs.

You decide for yourself. Here is their info. www.nature.com/nature/

Nature
British Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal

Nature is a British multidisciplinary scientific journal, first published on 4 November 1869. It is one of the most recognizable scientific journals in the world, and was ranked the world's most cited scientific journal by the Science Edition of the 2010 Journal Citation Reports and is ascribed an impact factor of 43.070, making it one of the world's top academic journals.

BTP Holdings posted on 2020-03-22 05:47:52   Reply   Private Reply


#3: NeoconsNailed    To: BTP Holdings (#2)

Can't tell from that, unless an entirely establishment view of the situation counts. I see its editor is a gurl with a given name that's normally jew -- Magdalena Skipper.

Here's the radically opposite stance of Daily Stormer, the anti-jew antigen:

dailystormer.su/coronavir...-300000-infections- 13000- deaths-is-this-really-a-lot-no-it-isnt/

Since the scientific and academic worlds are so thoroughly jewed over, it would logically be expected of a mag touting "an impact factor of 43.070, making it one of the world's top academic journals" ;)

NeoconsNailed posted on 2020-03-22 11:11:53   Reply   Private Reply