The Worst World War 2 Generals Of All Time

Source: https://www.ranker.com/list/worst-ww2-generals-mashup/mel-judson?format=slideshow&slide=2
Published: May 13, 2020
Author: Ranker
Post Date: 2020-05-13 18:58:54 by NeoconsNailed
Views: 1878

General MacKelvie's 90th division Division landed at Utah Beach a few days after the initial D-Day landings, and within days, had become bogged down and almost passive - despite the rapid gains American troops were making elsewhere. As the story goes , MacKelvie's assistant commander found the general cowering in a ditch during an enemy bombardment and berated him until he stood up. With the division losing so many soldiers that it had a replacement rate of over 100%, MacKelvie was sacked after just five days in command - likely the quickest replacement of any American general in the conflict.

Facing Rommel's elite Afrika Korps, Lloyd Fredendall was totally unsuited to the task of commanding American forces in the field. He was well-liked by superiors, but very hands-off in the field and issued orders in an incomprehensible personal slang code. One order typical of Fredendall's gibberish read: "Have your boss report to the French gentleman whose name begins with J at a place which begins with D which is five grid squares to the left of M." Beyond that, he infuriated Eisenhower by ordering an entire battalion to construct a giant command bunker 100 miles behind the front that he'd never have to leave. He left other commanders out of his decision-making process and had no grasp of how or where to position units to form a defensive line. The result was the US Army's humiliating defeat at Kasserine Pass. Soon after the fight, Eisenhower removed Fredendall from command.

A callous and bumbling military Luddite, Marshall Kulik was given command of the Soviet Artillery Directorate, despite loathing tanks and motorized artillery. He disdained modern tech like the machine gun, believed the field would be forever ruled by horses, and meddled in the construction of the iconic T-34 tank by ordering it to be armed with an inferior cannon. Kulik's interference in industrial production ensured the Soviet army was totally unprepared when Germany infiltrated in June 1941, leading to horrific casualties. A totally ineffective field commander (his motto was "jail or medal"), Kulik was nonetheless put in charge of the Leningrad Front - and led it so poorly that the iconic city was surrounded almost immediately, leading to a three- year siege. Kulik somehow survived the conflict, but was detained in a post-conflict purge, and then slain in 1947.

The commander of American forces infiltrating Italy in September 1943, Clark dithered on breaking out after his initial landing, which nearly let the German's push the Allies back. Then, in January 1944, in a glory-seeking effort to take the strategically critical ancient abbey Monte Cassino, he sent an under-strength infantry division on a dangerous river crossing against dug-in German defenses. Predictably, the division was nearly wiped out and Clark was later the subject of a Congressional inquiry. Finally, Clark's troops had the elite German 10th Army on the run after breaking out of the Anzio landing . But at that critical moment, Clark switched gears to capture Rome - despite it having no strategic value. Rome was taken with no resistance, and Clark rode in as a conqueror, but the bulk of the German force escaped, necessitating nearly another year of vicious combat - and 44,000 more Allied casualties.

Click for Full Text!


Poster Comment:

My faves are the ameriKan demigods, of course ;)

While MacArthur has a reputation as one of the most innovative and courageous generals in US history, he also committed inexplicable blunders at multiple points in the conflict. After the strike on Pearl Harbor, MacArthur was ordered to carry out strike plans on Japanese bases but gave no reply. As a result, Japanese planes immediately struck, wiping out his air force. His thinly spaced and poorly supplied US and Filipino forces crumbled, and he was ordered to evacuate Manila with his command staff. 150,000 Allied troops had been slain, wounded, or captured. His bold conduct over the next four years gained him a justifiable reputation as a hero. But he was also reckless, arrogant, careerist, saw his role as the occupational governor of Japan as a stepping-stone to running for president, and pardoned Japanese war criminals involved in human experimentation.

The Eisenhower case should have been here. They used his portrait for the series thumbnail but didn't include his blunders!!??!!

Post Comment   Private Reply

#1: Ada    To: NeoconsNailed (#0)

Predictably, the division was nearly wiped out and Clark was later the subject of a Congressional inquiry

As I recall, Mark Clark lost more men in the Battle of Monte Cassino than MacArthur lost in his entire Pacific island hopping.

Ada posted on 2020-05-13 19:56:46   Reply   Private Reply


#2: NeoconsNailed    To: Ada (#1)

ROFL! I'm looking for the dirt on Ike but it's hard to come by. I have an old TV show about it on VHS tape tho.

NeoconsNailed posted on 2020-05-13 20:10:48   Reply   Private Reply


#3: StraitGate    To: NeoconsNailed, Ada, BTP Holdings (#2)

Only slightly off topic...

I've been watching the 1962-67 TV series Combat! on JTube since BTP posted a link to it here a few weeks ago. So far all of Season 1 and several episodes of Season 2.

Interestingly, the American soldiers almost always refer to the Germans as Krauts (rarely Germans), and the French call them Boche. Nobody ever calls them Nazis.

And the words Jew and Holocaust haven't been used. At all. Even though the show was, as far I know, as thoroughly Jewish as any TV production.

StraitGate posted on 2020-05-13 20:40:11   Reply   Private Reply


#4: BTP Holdings    To: StraitGate (#3)

Nobody ever calls them Nazis.

Even Heinrich Mueller, Chief of Gestapo was not a member of the Nazi Party until later in his career. He was convinced by Goering to join the party since it would be a plus for him. ;)

BTP Holdings posted on 2020-05-13 20:46:54   Reply   Private Reply


#5: BTP Holdings    To: Ada (#1)

than MacArthur lost in his entire Pacific island hopping.

My Mom was in love with a SeaBee, but he got killed in the south Pacific.

Then she met my Dad at a dance hall. She always told my two sisters, "Never marry someone you meet at a dance hall." :-/

BTP Holdings posted on 2020-05-13 20:50:33   Reply   Private Reply


#6: Cynicom    To: StraitGate (#3)

Nobody ever calls them Nazis.

They were not Nazis.

NAZI was a political party.

Cynicom posted on 2020-05-13 22:25:00   Reply   Private Reply


#7: NeoconsNailed    To: StraitGate (#3)

Isn't that strange! I'm trying to remember whether the casual term was 'Nazis' or 'Germans' back then. Kids used to sing "There's a German in the grass with a bullet up his ***" to the 'assembly' bugle call. Boche is an interesting word

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terms_used_for_Germans#Boche

Book ptly by the renowned Nesta Webster:

https://www.betterworldbooks.com/product/detail/boche-and-bolshevik- 1923-1168988195

NeoconsNailed posted on 2020-05-13 22:38:47   Reply   Private Reply


#8: StraitGate    To: Cynicom (#6)

They were not Nazis.

NAZI was a political party.

Yes, thanks, that was my point. But English language newspapers of the day often referred to not only the German army, but also to Germany itself, as Nazis. E.g. this headline:

GERMANS INVADE DENMARK; NORWAY AT WAR WITH NAZIS

StraitGate posted on 2020-05-13 22:39:30   Reply   Private Reply


#9: StraitGate    To: NeoconsNailed (#7)

Oh, this is rich! That Wikidhebria article on List_of_terms_used_for_Germans casually calls Germans Nazis when discussing what the Yugos called them!

"In the SFR Yugoslavia [Svabo] was commonly used in movies depicting battles between the Partisans and Nazi forces." (Emphasis added by Strait.)

StraitGate posted on 2020-05-13 22:53:32   Reply   Private Reply


#10: NeoconsNailed    To: StraitGate (#9)

75 years later they can't let Germans be Germans again (roll eyes)....

NeoconsNailed posted on 2020-05-13 23:02:07   Reply   Private Reply


#11: Ada    To: NeoconsNailed (#2)

I'm looking for the dirt on Ike but it's hard to come by

Disregarding the dirt, there are other not to like him

Ada posted on 2020-05-14 10:02:02   Reply   Private Reply


#12: NeoconsNailed    To: Ada (#11)

isenhower’s farewell speech was a long and nearly hysterical argument for the Cold War. He presented it as more than a military policy against Russia, but rather as a grand metaphysical struggle that should take over our minds and souls, as bizarre as that must sound to the current generation.

His words were Wilsonian, even messianic. The job of U.S. military policy is to “foster progress in human achievement” and enhance “dignity and integrity” the world over. That’s a rather expansive role for government by any standard. But he went further. An enemy stands in the way of achieving this dream, and this enemy is “global in scope, atheistic in character, ruthless in purpose, and insidious in method.” This great struggle “commands our whole attention, absorbs our very beings.”......

Oh my goodness gracious -- it's fantastic!! Wherejew get it? THANX.

NeoconsNailed posted on 2020-05-14 14:55:15   Reply   Private Reply