Early last Tuesday morning, a whistleblower who allegedly works in the federal circuit revealed a Supreme Court justice was seen in various Epstein tapes that were recently recovered by investigators:
One of the SCOTUS [justices] is in the Epstein tapes that were recovered yesterday. Im sure you can guess which one.
The shocking part is the canary is telling the feds a certain nation state has been blackmailing this gentleman since prior to his nomination to SCOTUS.
What does this mean? This justice was hand picked at the highest levels specifically because he was being controlled via blackmail. A sheep in wolfs clothing appearing to be which he is not.
Cat is out of the bag or I should say almost.
The canary the whistleblower is referring to may very well be Jeffrey Epsteins former madam, Ghislaine Maxwell.
The nation state that has been blackmailing the justice was later confirmed to be one of the 5 eyes:
Its not Israel. Its not even Russia/China. One of the 5 eyes.
After being prodded by readers to disclose the exact country, the whistleblower stated the following:
I dont know which country, but UK was in bed with our deep state intelligence agencies trying to dig up dirt on Trump. I dont think that is even questioned anymore. Outside of my area of specific knowledge though.
Also, since it was mentioned that the justice is a male (e.g. gentleman), some have speculated how it might be the Chief Justice.
The name John Roberts reportedly appears in Epsteins infamous little black book:
A screenshot from Jeffrey Epsteins little black book. (Source: Unknown / Unconfirmed)
In 2019, the Daily Mail published an article that included information about a passenger identified as John Roberts flying with Epstein on at least two occasions. (Source / Archive link)
The whistleblower continued:
Here is the best part. The SCOTUS justice on the tapes it is being rumored in the federal court community has sat down with the FBI to roll on a previous president AND wife in an effort to keep his position, or more likely, be allowed to gracefully retire before the next SCOTUS term.
If I were going to predict the future we are going to see a resignation in about 2-3 weeks as the last of the SCOTUS cases for this term are just about done.
Read more here (Warning: may contain some NSFW content)
#1: Ada To: Bill D Berger (#0)
Ada posted on 2020-07-13 10:41:18 Reply Private Reply
#2: Lod To: Ada (#1)
Bingo.
Lod posted on 2020-07-13 11:04:59 Reply Private Reply
#3: Cynicom To: Lod (#2)
Having two in the family, they were and are rotten inside out, top to bottom.
Never automatically trust Judges, lawyers and police. That would be foolhardy.
Cynicom posted on 2020-07-13 13:16:03 Reply Private Reply
#4: BTP Holdings To: Ada (#1)
Roberts' wife was unable to get pregnant.
They pulled some strings and adopted two young Irish girls.
They ended up having to take some heat for that. :-/
BTP Holdings posted on 2020-07-13 13:23:02 Reply Private Reply
#5: Ada To: BTP Holdings (#4)
If there is no statute of limitations, the Irish government could ask for their return.
Ada posted on 2020-07-13 14:55:36 Reply Private Reply
#6: BTP Holdings To: Ada (#5)
It is not Irish law that forbids adoption by parents outside of Ireland, it is the Hague Convention of which Ireland is not a signatory.
Do you really think Ireland would cause an international uproar by demanding those two children be returned to Ireland where they would likely be forced into foster homes? ;)
BTP Holdings posted on 2020-07-13 15:22:24 Reply Private Reply
#7: Ada To: BTP Holdings (#6)
The children were privately adopted from some South American country but both have blonde hair and blue eyes, suggesting European origin.
From The Thinker;
Which European country makes both private adoptions and out-of-country adoptions illegal? Yep. Ireland. Therefore, as the rumor has it, the Roberts children must have been born in the Emerald Isle and therefore their adoptions in America must have been illegal. Clearly the chief justice was ripe for blackmail if there were facts to back it up. Be a shame to see your family broken up over ObamaCare, wouldn't it, Chief?
Ada posted on 2020-07-13 16:05:07 Reply Private Reply
#8: BTP Holdings To: Ada (#7)
Ireland is not a signatory to the Hague Conventions on adoptions.
Look that up so you will understand this more fully. ;)
BTP Holdings posted on 2020-07-13 16:16:43 Reply Private Reply
#9: johnj To: Ada (#7)
Could this be a human trafficking story. Was Epstein into making a buck on adopting children for rich people?
johnj posted on 2020-07-13 16:51:33 Reply Private Reply
#10: Ada To: BTP Holdings (#8)
Ada posted on 2020-07-13 18:49:35 Reply Private Reply
#11: Ada To: johnj (#9)
Because Roberts appears to be under outside control, best guess is illegal adoption.
Ada posted on 2020-07-13 18:53:24 Reply Private Reply