I am puzzled, as I assume my readers are, why the powers-that-be chose the two least electable candidates for the Democrat nominations for president and vice president.
It makes no sense to choose people who have little chance of winning - unless the globalists intend to rig the election and elect them, or install them after a color revolution, in order to make the US a laughing stock throughout the world as a way of removing the US, a hegemonic power, as an obstacle to the global elite.
Really, once you see Biden in action, it is difficult to believe that even white liberals can vote for the Democrat ticket:
Imagine the ridicule that would be heaped upon Biden by the presstitute media if he were the Republican candidate.
Those of you old enough to remember President Reagan will remember all the presstitute insinuations about Reagan being senile and falling asleep at cabinet meetings. Of course, the presstitutes were never at cabinet meetings.
Reagan successfully confronted the two major problems of his time—stagflation and the nuclear armageddon that could result from misunderstood intentions or a warning system error. Reagan’s supply-side policy deep-sixed stagflation—the simultaneous rise of inflation and unemployment—and his negotiations with Soviet President Gorbachev ended the Cold War.
The Establishment has buried both achievements, and today Reagan is understood as the president who made Americans feel good while he cut taxes for the rich and poured money into the Pentagon and defense contractors. Reagan’s “star wars” was more illusion than real. It’s purpose was to convince the Soviets to end the Cold War. This was also the purpose of his military interventions against leftish takeovers in the US “sphere of influence.” The reason for these interventions was to give the message to Moscow that there would be no further territorial gains for communism.
Americans today, especially the youth, know nothing about how the Reagan administration gave us two decades of economic growth without having to pay for it with rising inflation, and they do not know that Reagan ended the Cold War.
Today the rightwing and Russians themselves believe that Reagan won the Cold War. That was not Reagan’s goal. President Reagan told those of us involved that the purpose was “to end, not win, the Cold War,” and that we must never act or speak in any way that implied that we had prevailed over the Soviets. Wikipedia, a disinformation website, opens its account of Reagan’s foreign policy with a blatant lie: “The foreign policy of the Ronald Reagan administration was the foreign policy of the United States from 1981 to 1989. The main goal was winning the Cold War.” The ignorance of whoever wrote this is extraordinary. The Soviets never would have agreed to losing the Cold War. President Reagan understood this, which is why he emphasized that our purpose was to end, not win, the Cold War.
Everything President Reagan accomplished by creating trust between Washington and Moscow has been destroyed by successor US administrations. As Stephen Cohn, myself, and a few others emphasize, the danger of both accidental and intentional nuclear war at the present time is substantially greater than during the Cold War.
It is difficult to reconcile Washington’s pursuit of hegemony with the divisiveness that has been created in American society. The Democrats and the presstitutes have made it clear that the November election will be used to deepen the divisiveness. For the rest of the world, the silver lining in America’s internal conflict is the end of US hegemony.
#1: NeoconsNailed To: Horse (#0)
NeoconsNailed posted on 2020-09-17 09:00:08 Reply Private Reply
#2: BTP Holdings To: NeoconsNailed (#1)
I remember when John Hinckley, Jr. tried to kill Reagan in 1981.
Timothy McCarthy took a bullet for him. He is now Chief of Police in Orland Park, Illinois.
Orland Park is southwest suburb of Chicago and is northwest of Tinley Park where we worked concerts at the outdoor World Music Theater. ;)
BTP Holdings posted on 2020-09-17 09:39:23 Reply Private Reply
#3: BTP Holdings To: Horse (#0)
That's a fact.
Reagan himself was responsible for the fall of the Berlin Wall.
He met with Gorbachev in Iceland. After that meeting the wall came down.
After the wall fell, the west Germans found there had been virtually no repairs done to the infrastructure in East Berlin because of damage done during WW II. No wonder people wanted to get out of there.
I believe there is a section of the wall in Reagan's Presidential Library. ;)
BTP Holdings posted on 2020-09-17 09:44:48 Reply Private Reply
#4: NeoconsNailed To: BTP Holdings (#2)
And here we have another guy who DOES deserve thanks for his service for defending his country where it's most crucially needed -- FROM INSIDE. Hope Mr. McCarthy got some kind of medal but I'm not taking it for granted.
NeoconsNailed posted on 2020-09-17 14:02:14 Reply Private Reply
#5: NeoconsNailed To: BTP Holdings (#3)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fall_of_the_Berlin_Wall#Background
Here's a real hero of the cause -- and since he's such a rarity, nobody's ever heard of him:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otto_von_Habsburg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dissolution_of_the_Soviet_Union
Maybe you're right -- maybe the 'Tear down this wall' speech set the whole thing in motion. Course it was the next year after the summit ;)
NeoconsNailed posted on 2020-09-17 14:15:27 Reply Private Reply
#6: BTP Holdings To: NeoconsNailed (#5)
Yes this gentleman was a historic figure.
And it was the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand in Sarajevo which led to the start of WW I. ;)
BTP Holdings posted on 2020-09-17 16:12:30 Reply Private Reply
#7: NeoconsNailed To: BTP Holdings, All (#6)
Here's mine, and it will be the poorest: Various alliances were formed by countries in response to real and imagined threats from other countries. Attitudes heated up, testosterone roiled, temperatures boiled to the point that a mangy little jew saw an opportunity to kick the free-for-all into action -- the assassination.
Something that just happens to power ppl but this time triggered horrors never seen before.
tinyurl.com/y39fbyt4
NeoconsNailed posted on 2020-09-17 17:51:02 Reply Private Reply
#8: Bill D Berger To: BTP Holdings, NeoconsNailed (#2)
Don't forget Hinckley was friends with the Bush Family.
Bush Son Had Dinner Plans With Hinckley Brother Before Shooting (The Associated Press Domestic News March 31, 1981, Tuesday)
After Reagan was shot, Poppy Bush began running the show.
Bill D Berger posted on 2020-09-17 20:51:20 Reply Private Reply
#9: BTP Holdings To: Bill D Berger (#8)
We wonder if that was just co-incidence or not.
And that is why Hinckley was really out to shoot Reagan, so Bush the Elder could be POTUS.
Remember when Jerry Ford was President his life was attempted TWICE. Who was V.P.?
Nelson Rockefeller. ;)
BTP Holdings posted on 2020-09-17 20:56:45 Reply Private Reply
#10: Bill D Berger To: BTP Holdings (#9)
I forgot about that. The Rockerfellas have been high-level NWO for decades.
Bill D Berger posted on 2020-09-17 21:13:23 Reply Private Reply
#11: Dakmar To: Bill D Berger, BTP Holdings (#10)
How George H.W. Bush redefined the vice presidency
Bush might well have been Ford's choice two years later after Rockefeller was dropped from the 1976 ticket. Yet when Bush was nominated as director of the Central Intelligence Agency, Senate Democrats made confirmation contingent on Bush agreeing not to participate in the 1976 campaign, presumably to depoliticize the agency. But for that pledge, Bush, rather than Sen. Bob Dole, might have been Ford's running mate.
The prize seemed near again in 1980 after Bush was the effective runner-up to Reagan for the Republican presidential nomination. Ford came to the convention backing Bush as Reagan's running mate. Yet widespread interest in a Reagan-Ford dream ticket consumed the Republican convention, and negotiators for Reagan and Ford explored such an unprecedented pairing. The dream ticket seemed inevitable even as Bush delivered his convention speech.
Yet when Reagan and Ford determined that the arrangement was unworkable, Reagan belatedly turned to Bush, though with some misgivings, because Reagan, and his wife, Nancy, had been unimpressed with Bush's primary campaign and Reagan worried about differences in their positions. Bush accepted -- without reservation -- and handled the perception that he was Reagan's second choice with characteristic grace.
Dakmar posted on 2020-09-17 21:55:04 Reply Private Reply
#12: NeoconsNailed To: Bill D Berger, BTP Holdings, Horse (#8)
I'm seeing he was a better prez than I'd tho't, while retaining no illusions abt him.
www.stormfront.org/ forum/t774839/
NeoconsNailed posted on 2020-09-18 11:55:54 Reply Private Reply
#13: Horse To: NeoconsNailed (#12)
Horse posted on 2020-09-18 12:15:42 Reply Private Reply
#14: NeoconsNailed To: Horse (#13)
en.wikipedia.o rg/wiki/Bitburg_controversy
NeoconsNailed posted on 2020-09-18 12:31:10 Reply Private Reply