HARD PROOF: Dominion Vote Tabulating Machines ALTER Vote Totals - May VOID Election in 28 States!

Source: https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/en/news-page/news-nation/hard-proof-dominion-vote-tabulating-machines-alter-vote-totals
Published: Dec 7, 2020
Author: Mike Rivero
Post Date: 2020-12-07 10:34:20 by Horse
Views: 521

Ware County, Ga has broken the Dominion algorithm: Using sequestered Dominion Equipment, Ware County ran a equal number of Trump votes and Biden votes through the Tabulator and the Tabulator reported a 26% lead for Biden.

37 Trump votes used in the equal sample run had been "Switched" from Trump to Biden.

In actual algorithmic terms this means that a vote for Trump was counted as 87% of a vote and a vote for Biden was counted as 113% of a vote.

Those conducting the test were so shocked that they ran the same ballots again. The same results appeared. ONE PIECE OF THE PUZZLE SOLVED. (It is worth noting that this was one County, and on one Tabulator alone.

Dominion Tabulators could have been configured with different algorithms in different Counties or States. The point is there is now hard evidence of electronic manipulation of the Election.

Post Comment   Private Reply

#1: Ricky    To: Horse (#0)

The FAT is in the Fire, Now.

Ricky posted on 2020-12-07 12:20:11   Reply   Private Reply

#2: BTP Holdings    To: Horse (#0)

Dominion Tabulators could have been configured with different algorithms in different Counties or States. The point is there is now hard evidence of electronic manipulation of the Election.

This is the evidence needed to put it all in the Supreme Court's lap. ;)

BTP Holdings posted on 2020-12-07 12:45:17   Reply   Private Reply

#3: Lod    To: Ricky (#1)

We hope.

Lod posted on 2020-12-07 13:13:42   Reply   Private Reply

#4: StraitGate    To: Horse (#0)

The numbers are suspicious, and cause me to doubt the veracity of this story. Why in the world would they decide to run the test giving each candidate 142 votes? Why not 150? Or 200? Or 500? And after they re-ran the test using 142 votes again (re-running with the exact same number was a good idea), why not run the test yet again using a different number of votes? Because you need more than a single data point to do the math and to see how the machine's cheating algorithm really works. A simple scale factor? Linear with an offset? A higher order polynomial? An exponential function? Any randomness? Etc.

StraitGate posted on 2020-12-07 19:57:29   Reply   Private Reply

#5: Horse    To: NeoconsNailed, StraitGate, Lod (#4)

We now have actual Dominion voting machines to examine so we should have results in a day or two.

What we have seen is that Dominion was giving candidates decimal number votes. How does a candidate get 17 1/2 votes?

Horse posted on 2020-12-07 23:21:09   Reply   Private Reply

#6: NeoconsNailed    To: Horse (#5)

I guess the same way a truckload of votes gets hijacked at a time....

www.rt.com/usa/508397-tru...ots-missing- pennsylvania/

NeoconsNailed posted on 2020-12-08 00:50:01   Reply   Private Reply

#7: Lod    To: StraitGate (#4)

... you need more than a single data point to do the math and to see how the machine's cheating algorithm really works. A simple scale factor? Linear with an offset? A higher order polynomial? An exponential function? Any randomness? Etc.

Just reading that made my brain hurt, but, I'm sure that you're right.

Lod posted on 2020-12-08 01:11:14   Reply   Private Reply