If the Supremes don't act soon, John Roberts will end up the scapegoat

Source: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/01/if_the_supremes_dont_act_soon_john_roberts_will_end_up_the_scapegoat.html
Published: Jan 3, 2021
Author: Douglas Herz
Post Date: 2021-01-03 09:09:34 by Ada
Views: 1488

The numbers simply do not add up. In the 2000 general election, Al Gore had two chances to make his case before the Supreme Court for voter fraud in one state — Florida — on the flimsiest of evidence (hanging chads and the like). In 2020, Donald Trump has had zero chances to argue his several cases for voter fraud in multiple states via unprecedented serious violations of election law: lax law enforcement, compromised voting machines, and multiple ballot-counting deceits. So the Democrats get two chances with the Supremes to overturn the vote in a single state with a single example of possible fraud, while Republicans get no chances in many states with multiple fraud mechanisms. It doesn't add up. In fact, it stinks to high heaven. The double-standard in the Democrats' favor is breathtakingly hideous.

The Supreme Court had better get off their useless Trump-hating behinds and start ruling on general election fraud ASAP, or there will be hell to pay.

The chief justice is in dire peril of ruining the reputation of his Court if he continues to hide while our Constitution is being trampled by corrupt Democrats. He had better act, and soon. If he does nothing, the American people will believe he is a voter fraud enabler. Without a fair hearing for Republicans, he will be the first to be blamed for the failure of the Trump team to get judicial traction.

John Roberts ought to ponder what that means.

Post Comment   Private Reply

#1: Pinguinite    To: Ada (#0)

I don't think the chief justice of the USSC has any more power to control what cases are heard than any associate justice. I think the "chief" title just means he has more admin work to do.

Pinguinite posted on 2021-01-03 09:22:40   Reply   Private Reply

#2: BTP Holdings    To: Pinguinite (#1)

I don't think the chief justice of the USSC has any more power to control what cases are heard than any associate justice. I think the "chief" title just means he has more admin work to do.

This article is a good read on those duties. ;)

BTP Holdings posted on 2021-01-03 09:41:13   Reply   Private Reply

#3: TommyTheMadArtist    To: Ada (#0)

John Roberts is a Lolita Express flyer. Better he be gone than on the court

TommyTheMadArtist posted on 2021-01-03 11:12:43   Reply   Private Reply

#4: DWornock    To: Ada (#0)

Don't blame Roberts for what Trump did. Trump could have had a 5 judge majority on the supreme court. However, instead of appointing Republicans and judges that would support the constitution, he appointed RINOs. In fact, all or almost all of his federal judge appointees were RINOs.

Since Trump is worthless as president, regardless of the election fraud, I don't care if Biden ends up as President. He will not be any worse than Trump.

DWornock posted on 2021-01-03 12:24:57   Reply   Private Reply

#5: Cynicom    To: DWornock (#4)

Since Trump is worthless as president,

Darned right.

Trump got ten million more votes than last time. This proves he was rigging the election

Cynicom posted on 2021-01-03 13:18:31   Reply   Private Reply

#6: DWornock    To: Cynicom (#5)

Trump got ten million more votes than last time.

Not that I care since neither Biden nor Trump support the people, if it was an honest election, Trump may have gotten ten million more votes than Biden. However, like Stalin said, "It's not the people who vote that count. It's the people who count the votes." And, that was the democrats who were aided by the deep state.

DWornock posted on 2021-01-04 11:10:51   Reply   Private Reply

#7: Cynicom    To: DWornock (#6)

We agree Trump tried to steal the election but honesty will prevail and Comrade Uncle Joe Biden will reign?

Cynicom posted on 2021-01-04 12:17:42   Reply   Private Reply