One for you history buffs that I bet you didn't know!
In 1975, President Ford was left to manage the difficult ending of the Vietnam War. President Ford went to Congress for a relief package to allow American personnel and our allies to evacuate. However, there was ONE US SENATOR who opposed any such support. The result was the embarrassing and hurried evacuation from the roof of the American embassy in Saigon.
This senator reveled in the embarrassment and did everything he could to leverage it politically against Ford. Despite the efforts of this U.S .Senator--President Ford managed to rescue 1,500 South Vietnamese allies prior to the country's fall. Had President Ford not acted quickly, these people would have been targeted and slaughtered for their support for America. When they arrived in America, President Ford asked Congress for a package to assist these refugees to integrate into American society. That SAME troublesome SENATOR TORPEDOED ANY SUPPORT for these shell shocked, anti-communist, Americans and our helpers, the refugees.
Instead, President Ford had to recruit Christian organizations to offer assistance on a voluntary basis. As he did so, the Senator belittled those efforts. What kind of person would oppose President Ford's tireless work to do the right and humanitarian thing? Who would want to play politics with the well-being of innocent people who stood by America in the tragic Vietnam War?
THAT SENATOR WAS JOE BIDEN"
From the book - "When the Center Held." by Donald Rumsfeld in 2018.(biography)
#1: Darkwing To: Horse (#0)
Darkwing posted on 2021-02-03 13:27:53 Reply Private Reply
#2: DWornock To: Darkwing (#1)
Because it didn't fit their narrative.
DWornock posted on 2021-02-03 19:33:17 Reply Private Reply
#3: BTP Holdings To: Horse (#0)
This instance shows the Democrat Joe Biden embarrassing the Republican Gerald Ford.
It all comes down to party politics. And Joe Biden shows his true colors in this sordid affair. :-/
BTP Holdings posted on 2021-02-03 20:37:11 Reply Private Reply
#4: Lod To: Horse (#0)
Lod posted on 2021-02-03 20:39:32 Reply Private Reply
#5: BTP Holdings To: Lod (#4)
No doubt about that. ;)
BTP Holdings posted on 2021-02-03 20:47:40 Reply Private Reply