They had 2 forensic examinations done on Floyd, and they both said the man died of a heart attack brought on by his Fentanyl overdose as well as a host of other underlying conditions such as hardened arteries and diabetes. He was going to die at some point and probably die young. Because he was a drugged out douchebag.

So, what did the family do? They got a TV show involved and a TV Show doctor from Forensic Files which of course told a different story of MURDER.

If Crump the attorney has any balls he will disclose the FBI involvement in the Mexican Mob Money Laundering and Counterfeiting scam they were running out of the night club that Chauvin and He worked at. Of course it’s just about race, racial justice and of course my favorite, White Cops Hating Minorities.

Speaking of retards. Some neck bearded beta cuck shot up a couple Chinese Massage Parlors in Georgia today and got captured. Just as the communists were trying to ram through GUN CONTROL. Bet they get the votes now to ban everything!

That motherfucking beta likely voted for Biden and for all I know it’s just another phony event created by the Chinese government to make their bolshevik puppets in our government enact sweeping gun control.

Would it be racist to consider Floyd died by suicide???

Fantastic -- if Garrison drew up the affair like that it's gotten universally known the whole thing is a fraud. StoneToss's take from way back in June!:

stonetoss.com/comic/black-lives-tattered/

I say Floyd is still alive and well and THE WHOLE THING WAS STAGED, based on video evidence in Bitchute etc. The main BC video is gone now, but I see there's a lot of material on it there that should be good (aside from prolly crediting the assumption he's dead).

I remember the Rodney King case in CA many years ago. They never showed the entire video, they just showed the part when the cops try to subdue him. My take is that the autopsy will not be entered.

And should a riot occur — and violent protests in Louisville, Seattle and Portland over the weekend seem to point to another such long hot summer - may we expect our new national leaders (Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer) to denounce the mob and stand up unequivocally for the rule of law?

FAT CHANCE!!!

I couldn't resist "circling back" LOL:

NBC Today Anchor, MSNBC Host Tweets Directive To Use "Protests" Rather Than "Riots" In Reporting

Tyler Durden

Fri, 05/29/2020 - 13:30

Authored by Jonathan Turley,

A police station in Minneapolis was torched last night as looting and rioting continued in that city. The escalating violence and looting has magnified controversies over how networks are describing the scenes.

Earlier, Craig Melvin, an MSNBC host and co-anchor of “Today,” shed some light as to how his network is framing its reporting.

Melvin tweeted a “guide” that the images “on the ground” are not to be described as rioting but rather “protests.”

That framing has been used on other networks, including some segments where the reporting seems bizarrely out of sync with the scenes in the background.

On Thursday morning, Melvin tweeted “This will guide our reporting in MN. ‘While the situation on the ground in Minneapolis is fluid, and there has been violence, it is most accurate at this time to describe what is happening there as ‘protests’ — not riots.'”

It is not clear where that “guide” originated but Melvin is quoted for a source.

Most television journalists from NBC to CBS to ABC to BBC to Fox have done excellent jobs in stressing the understandable outrage over the death of George Floyd, which is currently under investigation not just by local prosecutors but the Justice Department. Indeed, many of these reporters have shown considerable bravery in going into very volatile and violent scenes to report on the protests.

However, the looting and destruction is also a major part of the story as is the storming of a police station and burning it.

The effort to avoid referring to the rioting raises questions about the editorialization or shaping of the news. There are not a lot of ways to refer the looting and burning of businesses like the Target.

In the meantime, MSNBC journalist Ali Velshi stood in front of burning buildings but reported “For most of the day, today, it looked a lot calmer than yesterday looked,. And that’s what happened yesterday. It picked up later in the evening. The crowds gathered here and the standoff with the police looked very different last night.” He added:

“I want to be clear on how I characterize this. This is mostly a protest. It is not, generally speaking, unruly but fires have been started and this crowd is relishing that. There is a deep sense of grievance and complaint here, and that is the thing. That when you discount people who are doing things to public property that they shouldn’t be doing, it does have to be understood that this city has got, for the last several years, an issue with police, and it’s got a real sense of the deep sense of grievance of inequality.”

The concern over semantics in a story involving obvious rioting, looting, and arson undermines the reporting overall. There are frankly only a few words to describe rioting. It reminds me of my litigation representing members of Congress seeking to stop the undeclared war in Libya during the Obama Administration. The Administration argued in court that attacking the capitol and military force in Libya was not a “war” but a “kinetic action.”

It would be hard to come up with similar alternatives for these scenes. For example, “arson” could be called “combustive demonstrations” but it does not really convey the scene. Likewise, “looting” could be referred to as “unpurchased advocating” but it does not capture the scene of men breaking open cash registers with hammers or pictures of stores being picked clean of everything from big screen televisions to garden tools.

What is bizarre is that there is no need to try to sanitize or shape the story. There is a legitimate outrage over this death. There are many peaceful protests and most protesters are not looters or arsonists. However, there was obviously a riot unfolding and the media should be focused on reporting on scene rather than shaping it in a more positive light. Viewers can understand that there will always be an element within protests that will turn to violent or criminal means.

The men with the hammers stealing cash are not protesters. They are looters. The people storming and torching a police station are not protesters. They are rioters. That seems a lot easier than tweeting out speech guidelines. It does not take away from the terrible underlying story of Floyd’s death or the need for action on that case. It does not belittle the reason for the peaceful protests or the anger of many in the city. It is just fair reporting on what is occurring at these scenes..."

https://cryptonews.bizlim.com/news/nbc-today-anchor-msnbc-host-tweets-directive-to-use-protests-rather-than-riots-in-reporting?uid=348157

Whites, conservatives, and patriots standing outside the People's House on January 6, or walking peacefully through it after the police threw open the doors, are "armed rioters" and "white supremacists" and "domestic terrorists".

Blacks, BLM, Antifa and other Judeo-Communist toadies raping, burning, murdering, and pillaging, and a U.S. government bombing the capitol of a country that did not attack us are just peaceful protesters, doncha know.

They lack the most basic A-B-C levels of honesty. They are despicable soulless rats and jackals.

Whenever you see language getting more wordy and euphemistic, rest assured we're getting JEWED again. 'Undocumented American' = wetback border-breaking criminal. 'Extraordinary rendition' = fedgov kidnapping of some hero.

They lack the most basic A-B-C levels of honesty. They are despicable soulless rats and jackals.

Whenever you see language getting more wordy and euphemistic, rest assured we're getting JEWED again.

Yup. They change definitions like Horse posted here on the changing definition of "vaccine":

freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=246849

I read somewhere in the past few weeks that that is how they made an end-run around the Constitution...by changing definitions.

It holds true in the IRS scam the way they redefined words such as "income", "state", "employee", etc. etc.

Neck Restraints were standard operating procedures for the Minneapolis police. It was in their training manual...until after George Floyd:

https://taketheredpillpeople.com/news/2020/05/29/minneapolis-police-department-trains-officers-on-choke-holds-to-intentionally-render-a-person-unconscious/

T'would be nice if it came out in court that they learned it in Israel:

https://christiansfortruth.com/israeli-consul-confirms-over-100-minneapolis-police-officers-received-israeli-anti-terror-training-in-2012/

Absolutely. The scoundrels are criminally insane and change the most crucial definitions to match the dementia they're forcing on everybody. One of my many beefs about republiCons and cornsoyvatives is that they blithely take up the devil's jargon and make it their own.

OMG, it's prolly part of Krav Maga, a scheme of dirty fighting only the Izrullis would think up.