Latest Sibrel Interview Destroys Moon Walk, NASA, CIA, USG

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kiBvdYO4yw
Published: Mar 7, 2022
Author: Bet-David with Sibrel
Post Date: 2022-03-07 18:30:50 by NeoconsNailed
Views: 681

Was The Moon Landing Faked? This Man Believes It Was

Patrick Bet-David sits down with Bart Sibrel. He is an American author and film maker who has written, produced, and directed works in support of the belief that the Apollo moon landings between 1969 and 1972 were staged by NASA under the control of the CIA.

Visit Bart's website here: bit.ly/3n2Dp6G Purchase Bart Sibrel's Book "Moon-Man" here: bit.ly/2YPEyGf

Recommended videos: - The Future of Time Travel, Aliens & The Universe - Dr. Michio Kaku: youtu.be/DXtpibqvFfE - Classified Alien Encounters Revealed By Traumatologist: youtu.be/CiKT2z5HiDU

About guest: Bart Sibrel is an American author and film maker who has written, produced, and directed works in support of the belief that the Apollo moon landings between 1969 and 1972 were staged by NASA under the control of the CIA. He has written, produced, and directed four independent films promoting the ideas, with the first being the 2001 film A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon. In his works, Sibrel in part films himself asking that various Apollo astronauts put their hand on the Bible and swear an oath that they walked on the moon. In the case of the Apollo 11 astronaut Buzz Aldrin, whom Sibrel arranged to meet on a false pretense, outside the Luxe Hotel in Beverly Hills, the interaction resulted in Aldrin punching Sibrel, and in significant publicity but no criminal charges.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

This material hosted by an obviously Mideastern Jew who looks like he just stepped out of an IDF uniform? No wonder he's so sane -- he's Irani-born:

www.patrickbetdavid.com/about-patrick/

Bart Sibrel has at times been a bit difficult to take seriously. He not only looks but talks and smiles like Uncle Fester. He admits to having challenged the astronots a little too brashly sometimes. I don't see how the career he makes claim to be real

www.sibrel.com/about- bart-sibrel

.... but what he and others people DOCUMENT on the supposed moon walks is enough to throughly convince me of his overall thesis.

You've heard him on those matters -- now you'll hear how the feds tried to assassinate him and much more. Incidentally I found this because wikid's 'On this day' items just included "2009 – The Kepler space telescope (depicted), designed to discover Earth-like planets orbiting other stars, was launched." The accompanying artist's impression of the craft shows it, kookily like the Apollo Lunar Module, partly made of gold-colored foil:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mai...pe_spacecraft _model_2.png

There are times when they work like hell to get us to believe a lie, and times when they make it so obvious it's ridiculous. The way humanity including me has gone along with official whoppers is alarming. NN

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply

#1: Pinguinite    To: NeoconsNailed (#0)

I've taken time to thoughtfully consider a number of arguments that the moon landings were faked, but found all of them lacking or flawed in one way or another.

Pinguinite posted on 2022-03-07 19:26:46   Reply   Private Reply


#2: NeoconsNailed    To: Pinguinite (#1)

Why is it such a problem for astronots to swear on the Bible it happened? Their reactions are stunningly childish, even violent. Why foil -- Why did we stop 'going to the moon'.

NeoconsNailed posted on 2022-03-08 00:11:20   Reply   Private Reply


#3: Pinguinite    To: NeoconsNailed (#2)

Why is it such a problem for astronots to swear on the Bible it happened?

They'd view any such requirement as an insult. Consider that they risked their lives to do this and it was very much the pinnacle of their life. Yes, voluntarily, but just the same, any time anyone gives their all and succeeds in an accomplishment that massive, no matter what it might be, to have people then accuse them of faking it is understandably insulting.

Why did we stop 'going to the moon'.

Because there's nothing there. Nothing. If there was a 10,00 acres of moonscape on the earth, who would buy lots in it? No water, no dirt. No plants will grow there, no air, enormous temperature swings day and night, solar radiation.... it's worthless. And it was and still is quite expensive so there's no economic or scientific benefit. Six trips there was pretty much enough to tell us all we needed to know. At least at that time.

Pinguinite posted on 2022-03-08 00:23:40   Reply   Private Reply


#4: NeoconsNailed    To: Pinguinite (#3)

They should be delighted to swear on camera -- asking them to isn't an insult. Their reactions are bizarre and inexplicable unless a cover for fraud.

Everybody knew the moon was barren but we supposedly went there 6 times, and now the mania is for colonizing both the moon and Mars. The vainglorious next big thing would logically be setting up scientific facilities on the moon.

A major brag has always been that technology made such strides in the effort that it accounts for half of our main modern conveniences, notably personal computers.

NeoconsNailed posted on 2022-03-08 00:58:20   Reply   Private Reply


#5: Pinguinite    To: NeoconsNailed (#4)

and now the mania is for colonizing both the moon and Mars.

Being a health nut, I have a hard time seeing colonization of either place due to low gravity which I expect will have dramatic health consequences. And the idea of never going outside every again would make me want to kill myself, I think.

The vainglorious next big thing would logically be setting up scientific facilities on the moon.

That I could see, maybe, though the advantages of experiments there would be best exploited in zero G orbit, probably. And there is a mineable resource on the moon consisting of hydrogen isotopes that could be used in fusion reactors once that tech is finally developed, but obviously we can't do commercial fusion yet. We may need another 100-200 years of scientific progress before we're really ready to leave earth for another planet. But that requires us to avoid a nuclear war which can't be ruled out.

Pinguinite posted on 2022-03-08 01:29:03   Reply   Private Reply


#6: NeoconsNailed    To: Pinguinite (#5)

Were talking at this point about the imaginings or ameriKa's reigning madmen, vainglorious fatcats and the hundreds of millions of people whose religion is technology -- not you.

www.nasa.gov/spe cials/apollo50th/back.html

NeoconsNailed posted on 2022-03-08 02:09:15   Reply   Private Reply


#7: Esso    To: NeoconsNailed, 4um (#2)

Their reactions are stunningly childish, even violent.

If you're referring to "Buzz" Aldren, he was going the way of Bidet, even kind of looked like him.

Esso posted on 2022-03-08 02:19:05   Reply   Private Reply


#8: Esso    To: Pinguinite, 4um (#1)

I've taken time to thoughtfully consider a number of arguments that the moon landings were faked, but found all of them lacking or flawed in one way or another.

Does it even matter anymore?

Esso posted on 2022-03-08 02:20:42   Reply   Private Reply


#9: NeoconsNailed    To: Esso (#7)

Yeah, Booze Aldrin -- he really took to the sauce and repeatedly made a fool of himself.

NeoconsNailed posted on 2022-03-08 02:25:08   Reply   Private Reply


#10: NeoconsNailed    To: Esso (#8)

Yes -- profoundly. This is his greatest video and I think you'd find it vividly interesting.

NeoconsNailed posted on 2022-03-08 02:27:22   Reply   Private Reply


#11: Esso    To: NeoconsNailed (#10)

What video? I can only burn so many bridges any given day.

(Edit) Don't waste your time. My mission profile is strictly anti-Japanese (bidet) toilet propaganda.

Esso posted on 2022-03-08 02:30:42   Reply   Private Reply