Twitter has done an about-face and sold the company to the richest person in the world for $44 billion.
Rightists are having a merry old time making fun of the melodramatic reactions from high-profile liberals who fear Elon Musks purchase will lead to more free speech on the platform for people who dont align with them politically, and many of the blue-checkmarked commentariat who live on Twitter and cant go five minutes without checking their notifications are making a big show of pretending theyre about to leave.
Many critics on the left are responding to the news by ringing alarm bells about a powerful oligarch controlling an influential social media platform, as though Twitter was anything besides oligarch-controlled before today and as though billionaires buying up media is some shocking new development. Some anti-imperialists have expressed tentative hope that this new development may lead to some rollback of the jarring escalations in censorship weve been seeing on the platform in defense of US empire narratives, due to the plutocrats comments on the importance of free speech.
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1518677066325053441? s=20&t=J3HJAp_7kWZ6-ZAY17EXtg
From what I can see, though, the overwhelming majority of excitement on Twitter about Musks purchase is coming not from those who challenge power in any meaningful way but from those who want Donald Trumps account restored and want to be able to say mean things to trans people. And I suspect that says a lot about what were looking at here.
This important distinction was summed up by journalist Michael Tracey, who tweeted, The biggest test for Elon Musk will not be whether he rolls back the most obvious woke content policies that should be a given but whether he continues to let Twitter be used as a vehicle for the US national security state to counter official enemies like Russia and China.
Speaking for myself I wont be surprised if we do see some of the former, but I will be absolutely astonished if we see the latter.
You dont get to be a billionaire, much less a billionaire with massively influential media ownership, unless you collaborate with existing power structures. Musk has certainly been collaborating with the oligarchic empire very nicely up until this point, and its a safe bet that his purchase would not be happening if the empire felt its narrative control machine was in any way threatened by it.
Believing Elon Musk is going to save Twitter is as naive as believing Joe Biden was going to save America. Arguing over which oligarchs should control the media is as silly and undignified as arguing over which oligarch-owned politicians should run the government.
Billionaires coming to the rescue only happens in movies and comic books. Youre as likely to be saved by Elon Musk as you are by Bruce Wayne or Tony Stark.
Image
How many times are people going to fall for this a billionaire is about to stick it to the man and save us all schtick? Its very sad that were at a point where speech is being throttled so severely that people are hoping an eccentric billionaire will swoop in and rescue them from oppression. Real life is like a dumber, more boring version of Gotham City, except Batman is working with the bad guys.
Ill start paying attention to Musks talk about free speech if and when Twitter stops censoring Russian media and unbans people like Scott Ritter who were removed from the platform for questioning official empire narratives about whats happening in Ukraine. Until then Im going to assume hes at most only interested in protecting speech that doesnt threaten the powerful like Republican partisan bullshit and hate speech against marginalized groups.
The billionaires are not coming to save us. The idea that they might is a carefully constructed propaganda narrative that weve been sold for generations. The leaders of the capitalist class are not going to overturn the systems of oppression and exploitation which form the very foundation of capitalism. Superhero stories are designed to prevent us from realizing that only we the people have the power to rescue ourselves.
#1: Pinguinite To: Ada (#0)
It's not like anyone is betting any money on what Musk will do. We're spectators here, so we're not "falling" for anything. Twitter was a censoring platform before -- that much we know, and we know Musk has stated he wants a platform that respects "diversity and inclusivity" in political opinion, the current (fake) hallmarks of the left.
Platforms invariably come with situations in which censorship in some form is required, when it comes to things like porn, damaging disclosure of private info, libelous material, threats and the like, and those things invariably introduce grey areas where subjective calls need to be made. But we'll see what happens. So far, at least Tucker Carlson and the Babylon Bee have had accounts restored which is good.
Pinguinite posted on 2022-04-26 12:55:21 Reply Private Reply
#2: Esso To: Pinguinite, 4um (#1)
Esso posted on 2022-04-26 15:12:41 Reply Private Reply
#3: BTP Holdings To: Ada (#0)
BTP Holdings posted on 2022-04-26 16:33:47 Reply Private Reply
#4: Esso To: All (#2)
Democrats Call For Immediate Regulation Of Big Tech
WASHINGTON, D.C.In a sudden and unexplained change of heart, the Democrat party is now calling for the immediate regulation of Big Tech platforms, which they say have become too powerful now.
"We have decided, for reasons completely unrelated to certain news about Elon Musk, that the time has come to regulate the terrible scourge of Big Tech," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi in a press conference. "For too long, we have allowed these unaccountable platforms to censor free speech and endanger democracy. We are calling for immediate regulation of Twitter and all other social media."
Pelosi then checked her phone to make sure her broker made the recent tech stock trades she had told him about.
Experts in the Democrat party warn that if Twitter is privately owned by a billionaire who says things they don't like, that may encourage others to say things they don't like as well, which will definitely endanger democracy.
"We in the Democrat party have a proud history of standing up against powerful special interests and never cozying up to billionaires and powerful special interests," said Press Secretary Jen Psaki. "If you would like to know more about Democrat plans to regulate Big Tech, please follow me on GETTR."
Esso posted on 2022-04-26 16:51:17 Reply Private Reply
#5: Pinguinite To: Esso (#2)
Pinguinite posted on 2022-04-26 16:51:21 Reply Private Reply
#6: Esso To: Pinguinite (#5)
(Edit) I wonder if cross-banning is going to be a new thing? Say something unapproved on Twitter, then EweToob, FaceBook, et al ban you? Wouldn't surprise me as irrational as everybody is getting.
Esso posted on 2022-04-26 17:01:16 Reply Private Reply
#7: Lod To: Ada (#0)
That really simplified things in my little pin head.
Lod posted on 2022-04-26 17:04:04 Reply Private Reply
#8: BTP Holdings To: Esso (#6)
You never know what those Fascist slobs in the corporate board rooms are about to do next.
The definition of fascism is the combination of government and corporations. We have had that in spades in this country for decades.
And to think we fought a war in Europe in the 1940s to rid the world of fascism. ;)
BTP Holdings posted on 2022-04-26 18:54:55 Reply Private Reply
#9: Pinguinite To: BTP Holdings (#8)
Thankfully we now have "Antifa" to do their best to, well, make fascism permanent.
Pinguinite posted on 2022-04-26 19:31:34 Reply Private Reply
#10: BTP Holdings To: Pinguinite (#9)
Pick your poison. ;)
The Ideologies of ANTIFA and BLM in a Nutshell ;)
BTP Holdings posted on 2022-04-26 19:44:32 Reply Private Reply
#11: Esso To: Pinguinite, 4um (#6)
EweToob is really throttling Knowles bandwidth on his show right now. Everybody in chat is complaining about the 144p resolution. I thought it was at my end at first.
youtu.be/s8kdeOhZ26E
Esso posted on 2022-04-27 12:14:18 Reply Private Reply