Tucker Carlson: Guest says Big Bang is Nonsense

Source: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/FpcXw3Td4Ws
Published: Jan 27, 2025
Author: Horse
Post Date: 2025-01-27 04:01:25 by Horse
Views: 32313

Chamath Palihapitiya: Zuckerberg, Rogan, Musk, and the Incoming “Golden Age” Under Trump

0:00 The War Machine Takeover

3:22 Chamath’s Dark Passenger

19:47 The Emptiness of Silicon Valley Elites

27:06 Is the US at Risk of Losing Its Place as Leader of the Free World?

33:15 The Traps That Kill American Ingenuity

44:19 The Climate Agenda vs. Artificial Intelligence

59:34 Is There an Existing Healthcare System That Actually Works?

1:13:41 Origins of the All-In Podcast

1:20:57 How Chamath Changed Silicon Valley’s Perception of Donald Trump

1:41:40 Reacting to Mark Zuckerberg’s Joe Rogan Appearance

1:46:18 Elon Musk’s Role in the Trump Admin

1:56:34 Silicon Valley Needs God

Post Comment   Private Reply
⋮  138 earlier comments not shown — Page Up  |  Full Thread  ⋮

#139: watchman    To: FormerLurker (#135)

So said the Jews who murdered them.

Here you are mistaken.

The Israelites, not the Jews, attacked the Amalekites.

Huge difference.

watchman posted on 2025-01-29 14:46:08   Reply   Private Reply

#140: FormerLurker    To: watchman (#138)

How do you know this? Maybe the Creator is in fact this, if we are all part of God, and that God is ALL that exists.

God is actually not evil, so ok, evil is not part of God, but part of the Destructor, who also exists.

FormerLurker posted on 2025-01-29 14:51:26   Reply   Private Reply

#141: FormerLurker    To: watchman (#139)

The Israelites, not the Jews, attacked the Amalekites.

The Israelites were not Muslim, Hindu, or anything other than Jewish.

The JEWS are those who follow the Jewish faith, which is also their perceived history.

So yes, they WERE Jews. Call them Hebrew, Israeli, Israelite, or Jew, they are all Jewish.

FormerLurker posted on 2025-01-29 14:54:23   Reply   Private Reply

#142: FormerLurker    To: watchman (#139)

Was not Jesus named "King of the Jews"?

FormerLurker posted on 2025-01-29 14:55:35   Reply   Private Reply

#143: watchman    To: FormerLurker (#142)

Was not Jesus named "King of the Jews"?

By the Roman Pontius Pilate...in mockery.

Jesus' proper title is "King of kings and Lord of Lords"..

And he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, King Of Kings, And Lord Of Lords. Revelation 19:16

watchman posted on 2025-01-29 15:28:18   Reply   Private Reply

#144: FormerLurker    To: watchman (#143)

By the Roman Pontius Pilate...in mockery.

Not only there, but by the wise men seeking out the location of his birth..

From Matthew 2:2

“Saying, Where is he that is born King of the Jews? for we have seen his star in the east, and are come to worship him.”

FormerLurker posted on 2025-01-29 16:46:50   Reply   Private Reply

#145: watchman    To: FormerLurker (#144)

“Saying, Where is he that is born King of the Jews? for we have seen his star in the east, and are come to worship him.”

The true Israelite tribes morphed into "Jews" during and after the Babylonian captivity. (The Magi asked amiss imo).

And in every province, and in every city, whithersoever the king's commandment and his decree came, the Jews had joy and gladness, a feast and a good day. And many of the people of the land became Jews; for the fear of the Jews fell upon them. --Esther8.17

𝘼𝙣𝙙 𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙮 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙡𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙗𝙚𝙘𝙖𝙢𝙚 𝙅𝙚𝙬𝙨...imagine that, Babylonian people 'became' Jews.

Meanwhile, back in Israel Edomites (the descendants of Amalek, the people you love) 'became' "Jews".

If someone were of the tribes of Israel they identified as such: the apostle Paul made it known he was of the tribe of Benjamin. Matthew may have been of the tribe of Levi. Jesus was of the tribe of Judah (He was not a jew).

Jews were and are interlopers.

watchman posted on 2025-01-29 17:16:01   Reply   Private Reply

#146: FormerLurker    To: watchman (#145)

So Jesus was Muslim? Hindu?

FormerLurker posted on 2025-01-29 18:50:23   Reply   Private Reply

#147: FormerLurker    To: watchman (#145)

As I've already said, people who practice the religion of Judaism are called Jews.

Hebrew is a language and a ethnicity.

Israelite is a nationality.

There is no religion called Hebrew or Israelite.

FormerLurker posted on 2025-01-29 18:52:47   Reply   Private Reply

#148: watchman    To: FormerLurker (#146)

You need reading glasses...

watchman posted on 2025-01-29 18:52:52   Reply   Private Reply

#149: watchman    To: FormerLurker (#147)

Just admit it...you didn't read my post #145

watchman posted on 2025-01-29 18:55:01   Reply   Private Reply

#150: FormerLurker    To: watchman (#145)

Meanwhile, back in Israel Edomites (the descendants of Amalek, the people you love) 'became' "Jews".

I neither love nor hate people because of labels assigned to them.

Are you one of those who hate all Palestinians and would slit the throat of a Palestinian baby because Netanyahu described that child as "Amelek"?

Sadistic murder is never condoned by God, no matter what the Jews say.

FormerLurker posted on 2025-01-29 18:56:32   Reply   Private Reply

#151: FormerLurker    To: watchman (#149)

Just admit it...you didn't read my post #144

Apparently you're the one needing glasses, as I'm the one who wrote post #144..

FormerLurker posted on 2025-01-29 18:58:01   Reply   Private Reply

#152: FormerLurker    To: watchman (#149)

So what religion was Jesus, and what religion is the Torah?

FormerLurker posted on 2025-01-29 18:59:18   Reply   Private Reply

#153: watchman    To: FormerLurker (#150)

I neither love nor hate people because of labels assigned to them.

Are you one of those who hate all Palestinians and would slit the throat of a Palestinian baby because Netanyahu described that child as "Amelek"?

Sadistic murder is never condoned by God, no matter what the Jews say.

Your posts are worse than Rocky's...

You just blurt out emotional nonsense.

watchman posted on 2025-01-29 18:59:22   Reply   Private Reply

#154: FormerLurker    To: watchman (#149)

You dance around dishonest linguistic gymnastics.

And you still can't define what religion was practiced by the Israelites.

FormerLurker posted on 2025-01-29 19:00:50   Reply   Private Reply

#155: FormerLurker    To: watchman (#153)

Your posts are worse than Rocky's...

I wouldn't doubt you and Stone are the same person.

FormerLurker posted on 2025-01-29 19:01:34   Reply   Private Reply

#156: watchman    To: FormerLurker (#152)

So what religion was Jesus, and what religion is the Torah?

I give up...what is Jesus' religion?

watchman posted on 2025-01-29 19:02:02   Reply   Private Reply

#157: FormerLurker    To: watchman (#156)

I give up...what is Jesus' religion?

I really need to tell you? I thought you were a religious expert.

Look it up on the Internet if you need to..

FormerLurker posted on 2025-01-29 19:05:55   Reply   Private Reply

#158: Pinguinite    To: watchman (#124)

Yes. The Bible is filled with examples of God's anger.

Which I say is evidence the Bible is not the WoG.

And what could ever possibly happen that God couldn't recover from? What could ever happen that God would need to recover from?

Question not understood.

When one is angry, one recovers from that emotional state. Anger is a state of weakness. At least that is what I argue. I expect you would agree that any person who suffers from overwhelming anger needs prayer. That on it's face is an admission that it is a state of weakness.

I say the concept of an angry or jealous God is inconsistent with the attributes you listed above.

His anger falls under the attribute of being just, requiring justice. And also love.

Being just does not require one be subject to anger.

Nope. The leaders didn't have to tell the people of God's anger...everyone felt it immediately and personally. God would flat out kill scores of people until they came back into line.

Or the leaders would point to an incident in which people died and claim it was because God was angry.

But didn't God say we are made in His image? You have emotions because God has emotions.

I maintain anger stems from weakness. And God is not weak.

Pinguinite posted on 2025-01-29 20:22:20   Reply   Private Reply

#159: Pinguinite    To: FormerLurker (#128)

Here is where I can't take people such as yourself seriously.

The murder of innocent men, women, and children, theft of their possessions, destruction of their livestock, is EVIL and it is WRONG.

It's like something Charles Manson would approve of.

. . .

Well said. It's where theology becomes less of a sound philosophy and more an art of making a square peg fit in a round hole.

Pinguinite posted on 2025-01-29 20:26:33   Reply   Private Reply

#160: Pinguinite    To: watchman (#133)

Amalek means "those who lick blood"

They were utterly barbaric.

According to those who wrote the history books about them, which were their enemies.

Pinguinite posted on 2025-01-29 20:28:58   Reply   Private Reply

#161: Pinguinite    To: FormerLurker (#137)

The winner always gets to write history..

You beat me to it!

Pinguinite posted on 2025-01-29 20:29:59   Reply   Private Reply

#162: watchman    To: Pinguinite (#158)

And God is not weak.

Does God have emotions?

watchman posted on 2025-01-29 20:34:45   Reply   Private Reply

#163: watchman    To: Pinguinite (#160)

According to those who wrote the history books about them, which were their enemies.

Well, then, are any history books trustworthy? How does one know?

watchman posted on 2025-01-29 20:40:22   Reply   Private Reply

#164: Pinguinite    To: watchman (#162)

Does God have emotions?

How do you define emotions? Emotions that are a result of the human mind functioning, no, God does not.

God is not human.

Pinguinite posted on 2025-01-29 20:51:42   Reply   Private Reply

#165: watchman    To: Pinguinite (#164)

Does God have emotions? How do you define emotions? Emotions that are a result of the human mind functioning, no, God does not.

God is not human.

Humans have emotions, capable of love, hate, caring, anger, jealousy, etc.

Did God not create us...or did God give us something He does not have?

I believe God is a Person, perfect, in every way. Capable of love, anger, jealousy...but never allowing those emotions to become sinful.

You're saying God is not even capable of love?

watchman posted on 2025-01-29 21:01:24   Reply   Private Reply

#166: The_Rock    To: Pinguinite (#164)

, no, God does not.

God is not human.

God is not human and you are not God. So you couldn't know if God had emotions unless you read the Bible. Hypnotists who consult demons doesn't count.

Of course God has emotions. God loves us.

Your position is utterly ridiculous.

The_Rock posted on 2025-01-29 22:38:12   Reply   Private Reply

#167: The_Rock    To: watchman (#165)

Humans have emotions, capable of love, hate, caring, anger, jealousy, etc.

Did God not create us...or did God give us something He does not have?

I believe God is a Person, perfect, in every way. Capable of love, anger, jealousy...but never allowing those emotions to become sinful.

You're saying God is not even capable of love?

Good points. You are making sense. I am going to do my best to respond to you in a different manner.

The_Rock posted on 2025-01-29 22:39:41   Reply   Private Reply

#168: The_Rock    To: watchman (#7)

The BB denies that God has communicated to us, that He has told us clearly how He created the universe.

The BB may pay lip service to "God" but adamantly denies that He has intentionally instructed us on His method* of creation.

As to rejecting God, try being a Christian professor (or student) in a secular university. You'll find out immediately who is narrow minded and vindictive.

The so called big bang is the theory of ancient dumb people.

The_Rock posted on 2025-01-29 22:41:23   Reply   Private Reply

#169: The_Rock    To: watchman (#1)

So Tucker's guest is correct...the Big Bang Theory is nonsense...foolishness.

Even more so for the Theory of Evolution.

More truth from you.

The spirit of antichrist is rampant.

The_Rock posted on 2025-01-29 22:42:27   Reply   Private Reply

#170: The_Rock    To: FormerLurker (#14)

Tell me, where in the bible does it explain nuclear physics?

lol. how cute.

The_Rock posted on 2025-01-29 22:43:23   Reply   Private Reply

#171: The_Rock    To: Pinguinite (#6)

so it doesn't mean the BB theory is rejecting God.

Yes it does.

The_Rock posted on 2025-01-29 22:45:10   Reply   Private Reply

#172: The_Rock    To: FormerLurker (#20)

You're the one that tried to compare the sculpture to the big bang.

And human beings and animals are much more complex than a statue. But you don't get it because you push your failed ideology.

The_Rock posted on 2025-01-29 22:46:23   Reply   Private Reply

#173: The_Rock    To: FormerLurker (#18)

but I trust the Biblical account... And what IS that account?

You are such a deep thinker. Not.

The account given in the Bible. Which is doubtful you even read.

The_Rock posted on 2025-01-29 22:47:38   Reply   Private Reply

#174: The_Rock    To: FormerLurker (#24)

What it comes down to bro is that the bible does NOT explain EXACTLY how anything was created.

The big bang is a theory that DOES fit into the biblical words of "let there be light".

HOW that light was created is still a mystery and up to debate.

No the Bible doesn't explain everything. It explains what God wanted us to know. IF WE TAKE THE TIME TO READ IT AND BELIEVE IT. Which you haven't.

Your big bang theory doesn't fit into anything to do with the Bible. It doesn't even fit into anything scientific. It is a theory of ancient dumb people.

No how light was created isn't up for debate. You can bad mouth what God said and pretend you are a God. But the truth is the truth.

The_Rock posted on 2025-01-29 22:51:44   Reply   Private Reply

#175: The_Rock    To: Pinguinite (#33)

It could have been a divine event caused by the instant injection of mass that caused the creation of our universe. Some event outside of our universe that caused this universe to be created. In fact, I don't see how anyone believing in an ultimate supreme God could argue that our current universe contains God Himself. God MUST be beyond our universe.

Whatever that means. Who knows.

The_Rock posted on 2025-01-29 22:53:26   Reply   Private Reply

#176: The_Rock    To: Pinguinite (#34)

You have no room to accept the possibility that there could have been divine power and design behind either the BB or Evolution?

There is no room to accept that life evolved. When monkeys have sex they never produce people. When snails have sex they only produce snails. That goes for every other creature in our world without any exceptions.

To believe otherwise or open your mind to the possibility is quite insane honestly. Every real scientist knows that.

The_Rock posted on 2025-01-29 22:55:24   Reply   Private Reply

#177: The_Rock    To: watchman (#36)

in THEIR own likeness A reference to the triune nature of God...Father, Son, Holy Spirit

Yes. That is what I think. Mike Winger has a video on that. He gave some examples of what some other theories of that means. I don't recall everything he mentioned. Maybe I will post it sometime.

If I don't get banned for speaking my mind.

I have a special set of rules. Like if someone insults me I'm not allowed to insult them back.

The_Rock posted on 2025-01-29 22:57:50   Reply   Private Reply

#178: The_Rock    To: FormerLurker (#37)

Some can't think beyond what they are told.

Some people can't admit they are sinners in need or redemption. They want to hold onto their sin.

The_Rock posted on 2025-01-29 22:58:54   Reply   Private Reply

#179: The_Rock    To: FormerLurker (#39)

You can't trust mistranslated texts from a few thousand years ago to be 100% accurate or complete.

You cannot be trusted to tell the truth. You just made up something about mistranslated texts. So you cannot be trusted. Take that to the bank.

The_Rock posted on 2025-01-29 23:00:42   Reply   Private Reply

#180: The_Rock    To: watchman (#42)

His Son (actually our Universe) Show me the verse that says that.

He can't do that. Some people are not honest.

The_Rock posted on 2025-01-29 23:03:26   Reply   Private Reply

#181: The_Rock    To: Pinguinite (#41)

His ability is not in question.

It has in fact been put in question here. Some of you all have said it is not possible that God preserved his word and their are errors in it. Some people thing God is not capable of that.

The_Rock posted on 2025-01-29 23:04:50   Reply   Private Reply

#182: The_Rock    To: FormerLurker (#43)

Does God explain nuclear physics, chemistry, or math anywhere in the bible?

Do you think ancient Hebrews who wrote the bible would have known anything about those things?

That is a lame. God didn't give us the recipe for Eggnog either. So what does that matter?

The_Rock posted on 2025-01-29 23:06:11   Reply   Private Reply

#183: The_Rock    To: Pinguinite (#51)

Where does the Bible say the BB & evolution did not occur? If the Bible is silent on those matters, then it's not contradicting those theories.

God didn't say not to mix Clorox bleach and Ammonia. So maybe that is good for us to breathe. That is basically what you just wrote. And no the Bible isn't silent on those matters it gave us a very clear description in Genesis chapter 1 and 2 of what happened. Even a third grader could understand it if they don't go adding stuff the the verses and making stuff up. That is even more reliable than bitcoin.

The_Rock posted on 2025-01-29 23:09:27   Reply   Private Reply

#184: The_Rock    To: Pinguinite (#59)

It's actually improper scientific method to start with the assumption that something is true, then proceed to search for evidence supporting that conclusion.

You just said evolution and the Big Bang are bullshit.

The_Rock posted on 2025-01-29 23:11:21   Reply   Private Reply

#185: The_Rock    To: FormerLurker (#63)

I'm pretty sure

pretty sure means you don't know.

I'm sure you think you are smart.

The_Rock posted on 2025-01-29 23:12:46   Reply   Private Reply

#186: The_Rock    To: FormerLurker (#63)

In fact, if you look at skeletons of modern birds and compared them to skeletons of dinosaurs, they are quite similar. Which would mean modern birds are most likely descended from dinosaurs.

Everything in science says you are full of it. Birds have birds, people have people, turtles have turtles. What you say is a product of someone's imagination and you clinging to someone else's imagination as if it is a fact.

The_Rock posted on 2025-01-29 23:15:32   Reply   Private Reply

#187: The_Rock    To: FormerLurker (#64)

Then you should know that what I've said concerning the mistranslation of Genesis is an absolute fact,

You have already proven that you are not to be trusted. Now you have doubled down on it.

More wisdom to come tomorrow if I am not banned for speaking my mind. You know free speech and all.

The_Rock posted on 2025-01-29 23:16:50   Reply   Private Reply

#188: Pinguinite    To: watchman (#165)

I believe God is a Person, perfect, in every way. Capable of love, anger, jealousy...but never allowing those emotions to become sinful.

But God killing some of his children out of anger or jealousy wouldn't be considered "sinful" right? But it would be for us?

Pinguinite posted on 2025-01-30 13:19:42   Reply   Private Reply

⋮  128 later comments not shown — Page Down  |  Full Thread  ⋮