let’s look at the fabricated case.

First of all, the alleged whistleblower is not a legitimate whistleblower. He is Eric Ciaramella, a CIA officer with a second-hand complaint who met with House Intelligence (sic) chairman Adam Schiff a month ahead to orchestrate the event. Ciaramella served on Obama’s staff when VP Joe Biden was point man for Ukraine. Ciaramella also worked with CIA Director John Brennan, the architect of “Russiagate,” and with a Democratic National Committee operative who encouraged Ukraine officials to come up with dirt on President Trump.
>
Finally, there is the question of the whistleblower law. If this interpretation sent to me by a reliable source is correct, there is no basis in law for the alleged whistleblower complaint.

https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2019/09/30/the-whistleblower-complaint-is-an- orchestration-not-in-compliance-with-whistleblower-law/

There is a Clinton era treaty with Ukraine signed in 2000 I did not know existed which seems to authorize the very conversation Trump was having with the President of Ukraine. Here is the treaty language:

Article 1 that “[t]he Contracting States shall provide mutual assistance, in accordance with the provisions of this Treaty, in connection with the investigation, prosecution, and prevention of offenses, and in proceedings related to criminal matters.” [+ 4um Ref. re: 1998]

The so-called "whistleblower" is an accomplice parroting whoever the "gossipy" leaker is that illegally spoke to them about a classified phone call between President Trump and the President of Ukraine. Who is that national security breaching leaker and why haven't we heard yet that they've been charged as a lawbreaker?

Joe Biden brags in front of the Council on Foreign Relations that he gave the Ukrainian president 6 hours to fire the prosecutor or forfeit $1 billion in US aid.
>
As Biden was US Vice President at the time and is currently the leading Democratic candidate for the US presidential nomination, he is clearly guilty of what Trump is accused. Why is only Trump subject to investigation? If an offense that is merely suspected or alleged suffices for impeaching a president, why isn’t a known and admitted and bragged about offense reason to disqualify Biden from being president?

One would think that a question this obvious would be the topic of debate.

This manifestly disqualifes the nonsensical Democrat Party from the 2020 election, imo:

McConnell: Democrats would rather impeach Trump than fund our military - YouTube, 4 minutes | Published on Oct 30, 2019 by Fox News

Kentucky Republican Sen. Mitch McConnell addresses the impeachment inquiry from the Senate floor and Democrats' threat to filibuster defense funding legislation

@ 0:52 , (R-KY) Senator McConnell: "If Democrats filibuster this Defense funding, as they've threatened to, they will literally be filibustering the exact kind of Military assistance for Ukraine over which they are trying to impeach the President. Let me say that again: This legislation is what appropriates the money for the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative - precisely the program the Democrats are trying to impeach President Trump for supposedly slow-walking. And yet, tomorrow - right here in the Senate, they say they're going to filibuster funding for the exact same program. Only in Washington - only in Washington would you see a show like that. They want to impeach the President for delaying assistance to Ukraine while they block funding for the program themselves. I'd say it's unbelievable except that's exactly what's happening."

They want to impeach the President for delaying assistance to Ukraine while they block funding for the program themselves.

Is this what this phony impeachment is all about? Talk about double standards.

You can't have your cake and eat it too. Maybe these clowns should be thrown out themselves or censured at the very least. ;)

Maybe these clowns should be thrown out themselves or censured at the very least. ;)

Yes, at the very least. Evidently, they can't even read properly:

washtimes.com transcript.pdf | MEMORANDUM OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION | SUBJECT: (C) Telephone Conversation with President Zelenskyy of Ukraine | PARTICIPANTS: President Zelenskyy of Ukraine | Notetakers: The White House Situation Room | DATE, TIME: July 25, 2019, 9:03 - 9:33 a.m. EDT | AND PLACE: Residence | Declassified by order of the President | September 24, 2019 | Excerpts:

(S/NF) The President: I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it. I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike... I guess you have one of your wealthy people... The server, they say Ukraine has it. There are a lot of things that went on, the whole situation. I think you are surrounding yourself with some of the same people. I would like to have the Attorney General" [Note: AG Bill Barr, not Attorney Rudy Giuliani] "call you or your people and I would like you to get to the bottom of it." ... "they say a lot of it started with Ukraine. Whatever you can do, it's very important that you do it if that's possible." [Note: The only favor Pres. Trump requested was not about investigating the Bidens at all. It was about the alleged DNC server issues of Russiagate.]

(S/NF) President Zelenskyy: [Note: The first time that Guiliani is mentioned in the conversation is by Pres. Zelenskyy, not Pres. Trump.] ... "one of my assistants spoke with Mr. Giuliani just recently and we are hoping very much that Mr. Giuliani will be able to travel to Ukraine and we will meet once he comes to Ukraine." ... "I guarantee as the President of Ukraine that all the" [Note: DNC server and CrowdStrike] "investigations will be done openly and candidly. That I can assure you."

(S/NF) The President: "Good because I heard you had a prosecutor who was very good and he was shut down and that's really unfair. A lot of people are talking about that, the way they shut your very good prosecutor down and you had some very bad people involved. Mr. Giuliani is a highly respected man. He was the mayor of New York City, a great mayor, and" [Note: in response to Pres. Zelenskyy's comment above re: Giuliani] "I would like him to call you. I will ask him to call you along with the Attorney General." ... "The other thing," [Note: on the shutdown topic of Ukraine's Prosecutor, besides making phone call arrangements about that re: AG Barr + phone call arrangements for Zelenskyy's stated interests re: Atty. Giuliani] "there's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it... It sounds horrible to me."

washtimes.com transcript

And to think this was all out in public view for anyone to read at their leisure. Maybe they need some new advisors too. ;)

washtimes.com transcript

And to think this was all out in public view for anyone to read at their leisure. Maybe they need some new advisors too. ;)

The Communistas seemingly exist in an alternate dimension where they believe nothing from anyone that contradicts their inane lies and fictions. Examples [4um Ref.]:

the two foundational texts of the deceitful Russiagate narrative [are]: the Steele Dossier and, directly related, the contrived but equally ramifying Intelligence Community Assessment of January 2017. (Not coincidentally, they were made public at virtually the same time, inflating Russiagate into an obsessive national scandal.)
>
if Kremlin leader Putin so favored Trump, as a Russiagate premise insists, is it really plausible that underlings in the Kremlin would have risked Putin’s ire by furnishing Steele with anti-Trump “information”?

Nevertheless, they continually insist against logic that Russia wanted to "help" Trump win the election and harm HRC's electability. As a result of that lie, America was put on a war footing against any nation of the world the Commiecrats accuse of "election interference" because DHS Sec Jeh Johnson declared elections to be among our Critical Infrastructures, making even alleged Facebook ads that they don't like the equivalent of an Aggressive Act of War in the range of a War Crime. He did that based on the so-called "Intelligence Community Assessment of January 2017" re: the alleged Russia hacks of Democrat cyber-systems data and such -- based on no inspection by any Intel agency here whatsoever of the DNC server, which the Democrat Party refused to turn over to them despite several requests.

What that Russia-villification "Assessment" was bizarrely based on is just the CrowdStrike reportings by that company's Moscow-born "cyber security" official, Dmitry Alperovitch -- who is suspected himself of staging the mess on behalf of the supposedly "Anti-Russian" Democrat Party, Neocons&Never Trumpers, Globalist agendists, Oligarchish money moguls, et al. Now we're in the Ukrainegate phase where they want Trump impeached for what they've done and threatened to do themselves, with an Inquisitional "Dem. Star Chamber"/Soviet-styled kangaroo court that obstructs and denies Due Process procedures for Republicans -- but Leftists aren't concerned at all about the national security breaching leaker and lawbreaker, who they claim informed their alleged "whistleblower" of wrongful actions by Trump that the Ukraine phone call transcript verifies didn't happen. Pelosi didn't even wait for it to be publicly released for reading before she launched the Impeachment "Inquiry". Maybe she thought of it like "national health care legislation" or something that would have to be Congressionally voted on as "approved" before it could be read and understood by others. They definitely do need better advisors but most likely wouldn't be convinced to reconsider unless it's what they want to hear.

if Kremlin leader Putin so favored Trump, as a Russiagate premise insists, is it really plausible that underlings in the Kremlin would have risked Putin’s ire by furnishing Steele with anti-Trump “information”?

they continually insist against logic that Russia wanted to "help" Trump win the election and harm HRC's electability.

ROTFLOL

And to think that Hillary and Bill benefitted from "donations" to the Clinton Foundation by arranging 20% of U.S. Uranium to be taken by the Russians.

This indeed was a Quid Pro Quo that Trump has been accused of that never happened. This was the Uranium One scandal.

Hillary was Secretary of State at the time. So why has she not been tried, convicted and put in prison yet? ;)