Cops put GPS tracker on man’s car, charge him with theft for removing it

Source: https://governmentslaves.news/2019/11/19/cops-put-gps-tracker-on-mans-car-charge-him-with-theft-for-removing-it/
Published: Nov 19, 2019
Author: staff
Post Date: 2019-11-19 20:37:59 by Horse
Views: 698

Back in 2012, the US Supreme Court ruled that it’s illegal for the police to attach a GPS tracking device to someone’s car without a warrant. But what if you find a GPS tracking device on your car? Can you remove it?

A little more than a year ago, the state of Indiana charged a suspected drug dealer with theft for removing a government-owned GPS tracking device from his SUV. This month, the state’s Supreme Court began considering the case, and some justices seemed skeptical of the government’s argument.

“I’m really struggling with how is that theft,” said Justice Steven David during recent oral arguments.

One time in Warrick County

The case began in July 2018, when the Warrick County Sheriff’s Office got a warrant to attach a GPS tracking device to Derek Heuring’s car. Information from a confidential informant had led them to believe that Heuring was using the vehicle to sell meth.

The GPS device transmitted data for a little more than a week. Then it stopped. Officers suspected Heuring had discovered and removed it.

After waiting another 10 days to see if it would start working again, detectives applied for a warrant to search Heuring’s home and a nearby property belonging to Heuring’s parents. US law requires law enforcement to show probable cause that a crime had been committed before engaging in a search. In this case, police said they suspected that Heuring had committed the crime of theft by taking the GPS device.

Police did find the tracking device. They also found methamphatamine and drug paraphernalia—evidence that police say show that Heuring had been dealing drugs.

So Heuring was charged both with drug dealing and with theft of the GPS device. Is it theft to remove a GPS tracking device?

At trial, Heuring’s legal team argued that the search had been illegal because the police didn’t have probable cause to believe their client had committed theft. The defense pointed out that the device could have fallen off the car by accident or simply malfunctioned.

Even if Heuring did take the device off the vehicle, he couldn’t have known for sure that it belonged to the government. It wasn’t exactly labeled as the property of the Warrick County Sheriff’s Office. Most important, it’s not clear that taking an unwanted device off your car is theft—even if you know who it belongs to.

Post Comment   Private Reply

#1: Lod    To: Horse (#0)

Police did find the tracking device.

How can it be theft if the device had been moved to a safer location?

Lod posted on 2019-11-19 22:52:40   Reply   Private Reply


#2: Pinguinite    To: Horse (#0)

That's funny. It wasn't theft because he was already in possession of it. The police gave it to him.

What's theft is the extra gas the guy lost because the police added this extra bit of weight to the car for which he provided free transport. And if it was powered by his car, he can charge for that loss as well.

Pinguinite posted on 2019-11-19 23:45:58   Reply   Private Reply


#3: Horse    To: Pinguinite, Lod, (#2)

They got the search warrant based on the theft of their GPS tracker. If that is thrown out, there is no basis for the warrant and that drug conviction is over turned.

Horse posted on 2019-11-20 01:07:44   Reply   Private Reply


#4: Pinguinite    To: Horse (#3)

They got the search warrant based on the theft of their GPS tracker. If that is thrown out, there is no basis for the warrant and that drug conviction is over turned.

I certainly get that compelling interest on the part of the state to argue it was theft. If the court rules against them, not only does it invalidate the warrant and case against him, it also means that any time the state puts a tracker on a car, they they are taking a chance that it'll disappear with no recourse. It might even invalidate some prior convictions.

I don't see how the state can possibly win this one.

Pinguinite posted on 2019-11-20 02:37:42   Reply   Private Reply


#5: noone222    To: Lod (#1)

How can it be theft if the device had been moved to a safer location?

(A). Because in this bizzaro world you and I own nothing. "THEY" own it all and if you so much as think you own it, you'll soon find out that you have stolen it or gained it by fraud.

(B). Vehicles are openly owned by the STATE. That's why you pay an annual fee to be able to use it without being charged with auto theft !

Ha hahaha ... the game is rigged.

noone222 posted on 2019-11-20 05:58:33   Reply   Private Reply


#6: BTP Holdings    To: noone222 (#5)

Vehicles are openly owned by the STATE.

And that is why you need insurance, to protect the State from potential losses. ;)

BTP Holdings posted on 2019-11-20 06:50:25   Reply   Private Reply


#7: Lod    To: Pinguinite (#2)

It wasn't theft because he was already in possession of it. The police gave it to him.

Perfect.

Lod posted on 2019-11-20 10:31:11   Reply   Private Reply