Ancient Earth A team of Harvard scientists believe the remnants of an ancient Earth that date to the time another planet collided with ours to produce the moon may still be lodged deep within the Earths mantle
If you thought it was a trip to see the Earth from space, then wait until you get a load of this: A team of scientists from Harvard University believe that have found evidence that an ancient Earth exists inside our planet. The team believes that a previously unexplained isotopic ratio from deep within the Earth might be a signal from material from before our world collided with another planet-sized body, which led to the creation of the Moon. This might be an echo of an ancient Earth that existed 4.5 billion years ago, prior to the proposed collision.
The current favored theory says that the Moon was formed 4.5 billion years ago when the Earth collided with a mass the size of Mars, dubbed Theia. This theory states that the heat generated by the collision would have melted the whole planet before some of the debris spun off to create the Moon.
But now, the team at Harvard, led by Associate Professor Sujoy Mukhopadhyay, believe that theyve found evidence to support that only part of the Earth melted, and that an ancient part still exists within the planets mantle.
According to Professor Mukhopadhyay: The energy released by the impact between the Earth and Theia would have been huge, certainly enough to melt the whole planet. But we believe that the impact energy was not evenly distributed throughout the ancient Earth. This means that a major part of the impacted hemisphere would probably have been completely vaporized, but the opposite hemisphere would have been partly shielded, and would not have undergone complete melting.
The team analyzed the ratios of noble gas isotopes from deep within the Earths mantle and compared the results to isotope ratios closer to the surface. They found that 3He to 22Ne ratio from the shallow mantle is significantly higher than the equivalent ratio deep within the mantle.
Professor Mukhopadhyay remarked: This implies that the last giant impact did not completely mix the mantle and there was not a whole mantle magma ocean.
Further evidence comes from analysis of the 129-Xenon to 120-Xenon ratio. Material brought to the surface from the deep mantle has a lower ratio than whats normally found near the surface. Because 129-Xenon is produced by the radioactive decay of 129-Iodine, the isotopes place the formation age of the ancient section of mantle to within the first 100 million years of Earths history.
The geochemistry indicates that there are differences between the noble gas isotope ratios in different parts of the the planet, and these need to be explained. The idea that a very disruptive collision of the Earth with another planet-sized body, the biggest event in our planets geological history, did not completely melt and homogenize the Earth challenges some of our notions on planet formation and the energetics of giant impacts. If the theory is proven correct, then we may be seeing echoes of the ancient Earth, from a time before the collision, said Professor Mukhopadhyay.
RELATED: Heres a Visual Guide to the 10 Dimensions of Reality
Professor Richard Carlson of the Carnegie Institution Department of Terrestrial Magnetism stated: This exciting result is adding to the observational evidence that important aspects of Earths composition were established during the violent birth of the planet and is providing a new look at the physical processes by which this can occur.
The findings of the team at Harvard coincide with a German teams findings supporting the theory that the Moon was formed 4.5 billion years ago after a catastrophic collision with a planet-sized mass.
What was this ancient Earth? Was there life there? We hope new findings about the ancient Earth will come out as quickly as possible, so we can discover more about the ancient history of our world.
#21: Lod To: Liberator (#19)
Richard Evelyn Byrd was born on 25 October 1888 in Winchester, Virginia.
Lod posted on 2020-01-27 11:40:00 Reply Private Reply
#22: Liberator To: Lod (#17)
There were a couple decent explanations...UNTIL I arrived at this blatant disinfo:
"It is possible to fly over South Pole as well. In 1977, PanAm 747Sp flew over South Pole while flying from Sydney to Recife. However, South Pole does not lie on the great circle route for too many points."
Two obvious lies.
Liberator posted on 2020-01-27 11:41:14 Reply Private Reply
#23: BTP Holdings To: Liberator (#20)
But still the magnetic north pole is not the same as the geographic north pole. ;)
BTP Holdings posted on 2020-01-27 11:43:17 Reply Private Reply
#24: Lod To: Liberator (#20)
True, but supposedly today's GPS is unaffected by magnetism. (This is about to get over my pay grade.)
Lod posted on 2020-01-27 11:43:27 Reply Private Reply
#25: Liberator To: Lod (#21)
Yes, American....
But remember -- Byrd was likely schooled in formal English; If you watched and listened to his Longines interview on his Antarctica missions, His language reflected that.
Liberator posted on 2020-01-27 11:44:06 Reply Private Reply
#26: Liberator To: Lod (#24)
Heh -- It's already above ALL our "pay grade."
Yet...we'll do the best we can -- which often is MUCH better than The Lab Coats.
From everything I've read -- and yeah, toss Common Sense & Logic into that mix -- it's MAGNETISM issue that prevents North Pole air nav.
Liberator posted on 2020-01-27 11:47:12 Reply Private Reply
#27: BTP Holdings To: Lod (#24)
GPS is not affected by magnetism since it uses satellites to pinpoint your position on the surface of Earth. ;)
BTP Holdings posted on 2020-01-27 11:47:37 Reply Private Reply
#28: Liberator To: BTP Holdings (#23)
The magnetic North Pole is all that matters on a physical realm and contemporary mapping that is now heavily challenged.
Liberator posted on 2020-01-27 11:49:15 Reply Private Reply
#29: Liberator To: BTP Holdings, Lod (#27)
a) "Satellites" if anything fly in VERY Low Orbit.
b) Given GPS (of both earthed base and Low Orbit "satellites") pinpoint positioning, we'd have to assume it's far more effective further away from Polar magnetic interference.
(rhetorical): Has anyone actually verified whether GPS works within 50 miles of the magnetic North Pole?
Liberator posted on 2020-01-27 11:53:53 Reply Private Reply
#30: Lod To: Liberator, BTP Holdings, 4 (#26)
www.britannica.com/biography/Richard-E-Byrd
Lod posted on 2020-01-27 11:57:53 Reply Private Reply
#31: Lod To: All (#30)
Maybe I don't know how to use GM...
Lod posted on 2020-01-27 12:03:35 Reply Private Reply
#32: Liberator To: Lod, BTP Holdings, Bill D Berger, NeonconsNailed, 4 (#30)
Yup. Byrd was an absolute American legend. The guy was even celebrated down the "Canyon of Heroes" in a ticker-tape parade.
The US military thought so highly of him that he led FIVE expeditions to the Polar regions. (yes, too bad things ended badly/mysteriously.)
(listen briefly to Byrd from 8:07...)
"I think it's important...for us to explore that [Antarctica] area....important for the human race...TO FIND OUT WHAT'S THERE...."
(WE STILL DON'T KNOW. At least 99.9% of us)
**And btw -- WHY explore "Mars" if we still don't really know what lies at the interior of an unexplored Antarctica??**
Liberator posted on 2020-01-27 12:19:39 Reply Private Reply
#33: Liberator To: Lod (#31)
Sheeeet.
Just imagine the Google Map SNAFU of Antarctica....
Liberator posted on 2020-01-27 12:21:02 Reply Private Reply
#34: Liberator To: Lod, BTP Holdings, Bill D Berger, NeonconsNailed, ALL (#31)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WQTYb36Cew
Liberator posted on 2020-01-27 12:26:12 Reply Private Reply
#35: Liberator To: All (#34)
If you notice within the scene -- and just as today -- the Scientists AND Military were joined at the hip.
The Martian "warning" spoke of "primeval slime" that mankind was said to have been borne; IT was and is still advancing the presumptive the Evolution Lie over the Creationist-Biblical Truth.
Liberator posted on 2020-01-27 12:32:34 Reply Private Reply
#36: Lod To: Liberator (#35)
Lod posted on 2020-01-27 13:08:34 Reply Private Reply
#37: Esso To: Lod (#31)
Maybe because there's no land mass, just ice there?
Esso posted on 2020-01-27 14:17:58 Reply Private Reply
#38: BTP Holdings To: Liberator (#28)
Really? And have you tried to look up any information about how GPS works? ;)
www.quora.com/Does-GPS-us...netic-north-or-true-North
BTP Holdings posted on 2020-01-27 14:42:05 Reply Private Reply
#39: Liberator To: Lod, James Deffenbach (#36)
Thanks, brutha. I appreciate the kind words and encouragement.
Knowledge is great, knowledge is essential, knowledge is important -- BUT, is Knowledge THE most important thing in our lives? (remember how Eve was convinced by the Serpent that it indeed WAS above all else?)
More than ever these days, I believe we desperately need to share our witnessing for His Word, His Truth. What is more important than that?
As we've grown older, our priorities should change. Whence in youth we are more about ego, reproduction, our life's work, and personal accomplishment; This invariably (should) give way to wisdom, selflessness, and refinement of our faith (and His Truth.)
As we age, many of us also experience the inevitable -- the death of family and close friends. For me personally, the grieving process has especially been challenging -- but heart/spirit changing experience. That's made it a blessing.
The grieving process also underscores how important it is that we understand how relatively brief our "trial period" by our Lord and Creator is -- as well as our respective "mission" it is to understand His Word and/or share our scriptural understanding of His Grace and Gospel *before* our/their "deadline."
As those we love pass on, it is a further critical reminder to do so before those we love and know check out into their "Forever Home." As you know there are no Second Chances.
Liberator posted on 2020-01-27 15:45:33 Reply Private Reply
#40: Liberator To: Esso, Lod (#37)
Maybe. Maybe not. That's what we've been told, isn't it?
Why should the gummint(s) be relied on to be truthful about that when they obviously are not abut so much?
Esso...IF WE WANTED, the three of us still wouldn't even be able to conduct extensive research and investigation near the magnetic North Pole epicenter either.
Both the Arctic and (especially) Antarctic regions for some reason are considered largely verboten from independent research and exploration.
Liberator posted on 2020-01-27 16:00:48 Reply Private Reply
#41: Liberator To: BTP Holdings (#38)
Absolutely. (pretty convoluted, ain't it?)
At the Quora link, there are several divergent opinions and theories on just how GPS works. Quite a few from those considered in the "Science" field.
An odd claim has been made with respect to GPS reception in the deeper regions of the Southern Hemisphere. GPS is BLACKED OUT and doesn't work.
One theory/reason: GPS is mostly a land-based phenomena. In the vast stretch of the South Pacific, this claim might be valid.
Liberator posted on 2020-01-27 16:05:25 Reply Private Reply
#42: BTP Holdings To: Liberator (#41)
That might have something to do with the positions of the satellites. ;)
BTP Holdings posted on 2020-01-27 17:33:29 Reply Private Reply
#43: NeoconsNailed To: Liberator (#19)
"I am reminded that I am a Military Man and I must obey orders -- isn't that wonderful? Soldier's honor so often means shutting up about things that have to be crucial to your fellow ameriKans. A bobby-soxer I know married an recruit who 'served' in the War Of Terror. I asked what he reported about his experience. "There's a lot he was ordered to keep silent about," she says in an awed tone.
"War crimes against women and children," I thoughtfully replied. People today don't give a crap whether their kin are war criminals -- if they ever did.
NeoconsNailed posted on 2020-01-27 20:29:02 Reply Private Reply
#44: Dakmar To: NeoconsNailed (#43)
Dakmar posted on 2020-01-27 20:52:46 Reply Private Reply
#45: NeoconsNailed To: Dakmar (#44)
www.youtube.com/watch? v=cPCLFtxpadE
NeoconsNailed posted on 2020-01-27 21:50:03 Reply Private Reply
#46: Dakmar To: NeoconsNailed (#45)
I woke up as the sun was reddening; and that was the one distinct time in my life, the strangest moment of all, when I didn't know who I was - I was far away from home, haunted and tired with travel, in a cheap hotel room I'd never seen, hearing the hiss of steam outside, and the creak of the old wood of the hotel, and footsteps upstairs, and all the sad sounds, and I looked at the cracked high ceiling and really didn't know who I was for about fifteen strange seconds. I wasn't scared; I was just somebody else, some stranger, and my whole life was a haunted life, the life of a ghost. ― Jack Kerouac, On the Road
Dakmar posted on 2020-01-27 22:02:40 Reply Private Reply
#47: Lod To: Dakmar, NeoconsNailed, Uncle Bill, Straight Gate, Cyni, Esso, 4 (#46)
Lod posted on 2020-01-27 22:25:38 Reply Private Reply
#48: NeoconsNailed To: Dakmar (#46)
Putting it in the first person now
www.youtube.com/watch? v=TlHaX55wG0Y
I hate the Cher-monster, but (am I repeating myself again) just looooooove her original Bang Bang record -- think it's a big little masterpiece, really do.
Are you a Beat or Kerouac fan? I'm not, but a great deal of my fave music embodies it. Sounds like the author was really stuck outside of Mobile with the Memphis blues again ;)
NeoconsNailed posted on 2020-01-28 00:17:39 Reply Private Reply
#49: NeoconsNailed To: Lod (#47)
NeoconsNailed posted on 2020-01-28 00:57:34 Reply Private Reply
#50: Lod To: NeoconsNailed (#49)
Lod posted on 2020-01-28 07:14:34 Reply Private Reply
#51: NeoconsNailed To: Lod (#50)
NeoconsNailed posted on 2020-01-28 09:31:15 Reply Private Reply
#52: Liberator To: BTP Holdings (#42)
OR...not.
Hard to stick towers with dishes to depths of 18,000 ft the middle of the South Pacific. ;-)
Liberator posted on 2020-01-28 10:38:17 Reply Private Reply
#53: Liberator To: Lod, NeoconsNailed, Uncle Bill, Cynicom, Esso, BTP Holdings, 4 (#47)
Whoa...
I guess this thread got slightly derailed off course...
(I'll post a Monkees video or photo of Helen Thomas if that helps da cause)
;-)
Liberator posted on 2020-01-28 10:42:14 Reply Private Reply
#54: Liberator To: Dakmar (#44)
Better in color...
Liberator posted on 2020-01-28 10:44:13 Reply Private Reply
#55: Liberator To: Lod, Bill D Berger (#15)
I'm re-reading some of Amadeo Giannini's book ('Worlds Beyond The Poles')...
He points out yet another theoretical definition or context of "Master" as Byrd mentioned the word.
"Master-Builder" -- as in, God.
Liberator posted on 2020-01-28 10:51:26 Reply Private Reply
#56: Liberator To: All (#55)
(Very brief):
The Wilkins Antarctic Expedition:
https://www.south-pole.com/p0000106.htm
Meanwhile...
HERE is an excerpted account of Admiral Byrd's first Antarctic mission. You may find the details of the prep-logistics, struggles, and discoveries by Byrd's teams fascinating. Odd that they were conducted at nearly the very same time as Wilkins Team conducted theirs:
Byrd Antarctic Expedition I 1928-1930) *NOTE: (Assistance was provided for the selection of equipment by the US Navy, the New York Times and several corporations)
https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/antarctica/highjump/great_antarcticexpedition04.htm
....The Byrd Expedition was the first American expedition to explore Antarctica since the U. S. Exploring Expedition under Charles Wilkes in 1840. The expedition launched a revival of interest in the Antarctic for Americans, an area much in the public mind during the early 1800's.
The exploring expedition organized by Richard E. Byrd in 1928 may be considered the first of the mechanical age of exploration in Antarctica. The program was the first of its kind to utilize the airplane, aerial camera, snowmobile and massive communications resources.
Although Sir Hubert Wilkins, on November 6, 1928, was the first to fly an airplane in Antarctica, he preceded Byrd by only ten weeks. (Byrd first flew on January 15, 1929). However, Byrd's flights, made with three planes (Ford monoplane, Fokker Universal and a Fairchild monoplane), were much more significant than Wilkins since they were made in higher latitudes and were tied in with ground surveys....
.....With help from the booster on the Fairchild, the engines on the Ford tri-motor were started and together both planes arrived back at Little America about midnight.
At 3:29 p.m., on November 28,1929, the FLOYD BENNETT took off from Little America on its historic first-flight over the South Pole. With Byrd as navigator, Harold June as co-pilot and radio operator and McKinley as aerial photographer, the heavily loaded plane proceeded to climb towards the Queen Maud Mountains. For purposes of navigation, magnetic compasses were useless so close to the South Magnetic Pole....
(I find the very last sentence on "navigation" curious...because finding -- never mind assuming a "South Magnetic Pole" existed was never proven... and does not exist.)
For what it's worth, I don't know who the actual author of this account was.
Liberator posted on 2020-01-28 11:30:49 Reply Private Reply
#57: Liberator To: Bill D Berger, Lod, Pinguinite, all (#4)
Why one but not the other?
If SOME our realm is purposely misrepresented or stuff hidden, why not ALL?
Q: Why self-impose limits, questions and assumptions of our physical realm altogether to begin with?
IF one prefers only to deal with Science instead of considering Biblical descriptions/claims, here we go...
500 years ago, neither globe-earth advocates Copernicus or Galileo explored OR were aware of the extent of the Earthly Realm. THEY ASSUMED -- based on mathematical calculations and principles.... THAT WERE WRONG. (Gerard Hickson challenges past theories and proves it WRONG. Like politicians, don't ever expect Theoretical Scientists or Astronomers to admit they are gaslighting us.)
In his incredible, eye-opening book -- 'KINGS DETHRONED' -- Gerard Hickson *documents* the history of the evolution of astronomy. He followed it from the time of the Roman Empire up to the date his book was published (1922)...
...then he examined, researched and detailed what he proved were a series of monumental miscalculations that began in the second century B.C.
Given once the very foundation and baseline computations of "Astronomy" was corrupted, would it follow that the REST of the calculations well into the 20th century would also be erroneous? (Oh yes, I highly recommend the book.)
https://www.amazon.com/Kings-dethroned-Hickson-Gerrard/dp/B01FA690L8
Because the institutional high priests of "Science" were in so deep in the mire, instead of re-calibrating the astronomical/cosmological truth, they stood pat -- refusing to admit the blunder. (MOREOVER...To do so might cause people to turn BACK to believing Scripture and Genesis on the descriptions of Earth & The Heavens again.)
We all know this corollary: "SCIENCE" NEVER ADMITS THEY ARE WRONG. (Q's: When are they going to also admit their so-called "BIG BANG" is just a kook-"theory"?? Same of the "4.5 Billion year old Earth" & "16 billion year old Universe." Same of their unproven "Evolution". YET...THEY PRESENT ALL THESE THEORIES S "FACT" in school text books, PBS, and Museums. (Why again must it be assumed as "Fact" that our Earth is a "Spinning-Globe"?? Hickson helps discredit that notion/assumption. Yes, yes...NASA. Nope.)
Back on point...
IF...IF 'Hollow Earth' is even possible (and who knows? ALL we have is the supposed testimony of the esteemed Admiral Byrd), it means this entire realm (as we've been programmed NOT to re-consider) needs to be questioned and challenged AS DOES the politics and agenda of Institutional Earth/Space Science and entire field of Astronomy.
Liberator posted on 2020-01-28 12:25:58 Reply Private Reply
#58: Pinguinite To: Liberator (#57)
The flaw there is that the speed of light has been measured and re-measured numerous times, and will likely be measured again as new tech tools and engineering allow. The science community is always interested in getting as precise measurements as possible in all things.
Pinguinite posted on 2020-01-28 13:07:48 Reply Private Reply
#59: NeoconsNailed To: Liberator (#54)
NeoconsNailed posted on 2020-01-28 14:16:17 Reply Private Reply
#60: Lod To: Liberator, 4 (#56)
www.scientificamerican.co...re-the-earths-magnetic-p/
Lod posted on 2020-01-28 14:57:05 Reply Private Reply
#61: Liberator To: NeoconsNailed (#59)
Yup. Far right. Playing like a boss. (traumatized snowflakes and liberals on the comments-thread still gnashing teef over Uncle Ted's politics.)
Liberator posted on 2020-01-28 15:33:39 Reply Private Reply
#62: FormerLurker To: Liberator (#57)
Prove it. You ASSUME a lot.
FormerLurker posted on 2020-01-28 15:58:32 Reply Private Reply
#63: FormerLurker To: Liberator (#26)
Don't be so pretentious as to claim the engineers who designed the GPS system weren't knowledgeable enough to understand what they were doing.
FormerLurker posted on 2020-01-28 16:00:15 Reply Private Reply
#64: FormerLurker To: Liberator (#13)
Concerning the shape of the earth and the fact it has a north and south pole, no.
NO aircraft is allowed to fly directly over the North Pole. THAT is correct and true info.
Prove it.
NO aircraft is allowed to fly over Antarctica (and especially its alleged "Pole".) FACT.
Prove it.
FormerLurker posted on 2020-01-28 16:02:41 Reply Private Reply
#65: FormerLurker To: Liberator (#14)
Wrong.
The civilized world has known the earth is a spherical planet orbiting the sun for over 500 years.
NASA was formed as a response to the Soviet space program that had just launched the first satellite into orbit, Sputnik.
There was a great fear that the Soviets would have a strategic and military advantage if the US didn't ramp up it's own space program and get a satellite, and later men, into orbit.
FormerLurker posted on 2020-01-28 16:06:13 Reply Private Reply
#66: FormerLurker To: Liberator (#20)
That's a lie.
The theory is the extreme magnetism emitted from the North Pole Area that could potentially affect electronic instrumentation.
Older auto pilot systems that used compass headings would fail when crossing over the pole. That problem has been eliminated with the GPS based autopilot.
Polaris, aka "The North Star" is always ascended directly above the North Pole. IT DOES NOT EVER MOVE POSITION.
So it's why it's used to determine direction using the stars for navigation. It's just because it happens to be the center point of the northern hemisphere of the celestial sphere.
In the southern hemisphere of earth the Southern Cross constellation is used instead (since it sits near the center of the southern celestial sphere) as Polaris is over the equator's horizon.
Hint:
What does this prove?
That indicates the earth is a sphere and its surface is obviously curved.
FormerLurker posted on 2020-01-28 16:15:21 Reply Private Reply
#67: FormerLurker To: Liberator (#22)
Seems the only one lying here is you.
FormerLurker posted on 2020-01-28 16:16:07 Reply Private Reply
#68: FormerLurker To: BTP Holdings, Lod (#27)
Liberator feels satellites are impossible, just how they used to think airplanes were impossible.
FormerLurker posted on 2020-01-28 16:17:47 Reply Private Reply
#69: FormerLurker To: Liberator (#29)
Some ORBIT in a low earth orbit, others don't, they travel in high orbits depending on their mission.
They don't "fly" as flying implies using lift to keep an aircraft in the air. In space there is no air.
BTW, I thought you didn't believe in satellites?
FormerLurker posted on 2020-01-28 16:20:37 Reply Private Reply
#70: Liberator To: Pinguinite, 4 (#58)
Excellent...
If I understood correctly, the notion is that the speed of light was substantially miscalculated early on, and that therefore, all calcs based on that error are also very much wrong.
Not only miscalculations/errors on the speed of light, but on several other "established" dogmas of science and astronomy. The respective authors of many theories packaged as "Scientific Fact" are the science icons or "Kings" on whom the title of the book is ironically based.
Einstein's main mission, motives AND theories (including the Theory of Relativity) were specifically and thoroughly shredded. There are THREE entire chapters devoted to Einstein:
* EINSTEIN'S THEORIES EXAMINED
* EINSTEIN'S EVIDENCE
* RELATIVITY
I don't ask anyone to believe me. Only to research for yourself if you or others are so inclined
The flaw there is that the speed of light has been measured and re-measured numerous times, and will likely be measured again as new tech tools and engineering allow. The science community is always interested in getting as precise measurements as possible in all things.
There's no question that the goal of Science's "grunts" or researchers at the bottom to middle of the Science pyramid of influence are mostly honest & interested in precision.
But Ping -- at the top "they" already know the Truth. Their Elites just won't allow it or revelations that damage "Science" dogma to stand.
Precise measurement tools of both LIGHT and MOTION have already long been available. Science's (mostly Atheist) high priests have been sandbagging/hiding the Truth for far too long. Archaeology is another field that's been corrupted at the top.
The biggest casualty of Big-Science (a "religion" itself) -- and hijacking the entire field at the highest levels -- has been belief/faith in God.(see" 'Big Bang'/Evolution/Old Earth.) So yes, there has indeed been an MO, agenda at work.
(Btw -- do you believe the 'Science Community' at the High Echelon level is genuinely and actually, "always interested in getting as precise measurements as possible in all things."??)
If anything, the opposite agenda is proven to be in effect -- even on the painfully obvious.
Two quick (SJW) examples below expose the 'Science Community'. They even refuse to settle the definitive, honest science with "precision":
1) Gender
2) "Global Warming" aka "Climate Change" (without even considering the Chemtrail Effect)
Liberator posted on 2020-01-28 16:21:15 Reply Private Reply