Chamath Palihapitiya: Zuckerberg, Rogan, Musk, and the Incoming Golden Age Under Trump
0:00 The War Machine Takeover
3:22 Chamaths Dark Passenger
19:47 The Emptiness of Silicon Valley Elites
27:06 Is the US at Risk of Losing Its Place as Leader of the Free World?
33:15 The Traps That Kill American Ingenuity
44:19 The Climate Agenda vs. Artificial Intelligence
59:34 Is There an Existing Healthcare System That Actually Works?
1:13:41 Origins of the All-In Podcast
1:20:57 How Chamath Changed Silicon Valleys Perception of Donald Trump
1:41:40 Reacting to Mark Zuckerbergs Joe Rogan Appearance
1:46:18 Elon Musks Role in the Trump Admin
1:56:34 Silicon Valley Needs God
#64: FormerLurker To: watchman (#62)
Then you should know that what I've said concerning the mistranslation of Genesis is an absolute fact,
Do you also know Gematria?
FormerLurker posted on 2025-01-28 18:13:51 Reply Private Reply
#65: FormerLurker To: watchman (#62)
I could make the same claim.
FormerLurker posted on 2025-01-28 18:16:03 Reply Private Reply
#66: Dakmar To: FormerLurker (#54)
That is why an infinite number of cycles is crucial to that theory. If I claimed, like, nine, the obvious next question would be "what happened before that, where did matter come from?" to which I am at a complete loss to give an intelligent answer.
Dakmar posted on 2025-01-28 18:16:13 Reply Private Reply
#67: Pinguinite To: Dakmar (#50)
I had been perplexed about where the energy comes from in a supernova explosion. Stars fuse from hydrogen to helium to iron. And apparently putting too much iron in one spot causes the greatest explosion in the universe (after the BB). Why? Still not completely clear on the physics but it seems an understandable explanation is there.
So a giga supernova is what you suggest. Maybe, but it would need to bypass the supernova explosive stage somehow.
But yes, if a "critical mass" is part of the equation then it suggests that not all mass in the universe need be involved. If that's the case, I expect conventional science to find matter that pre-existed the perceived date of the BB. That would be an endorsement of the long discarded "Steady State" theory.
Alternate theory says there may be many more BB events that occurred throughout the mega-cosmos. E.g. perhaps one occurred 100 billion light years away. We'd have no means of detecting it as light from it wouldn't be anywhere near our own BB bubble. Could be thousands or trillions of others out there.
And God could be behind each and every one of them.
Pinguinite posted on 2025-01-28 18:16:50 Reply Private Reply
#68: FormerLurker To: Dakmar (#66)
And that is where we all are. The BB theory doesn't explain that either.
FormerLurker posted on 2025-01-28 18:17:22 Reply Private Reply
#69: Dakmar To: Pinguinite (#67)
I've not kept up on my Science Digest subscription, but don't supernovas collapse into some sort of density pit?
Dakmar posted on 2025-01-28 18:21:29 Reply Private Reply
#70: Pinguinite To: watchman (#60)
To me, it's an endorsement of the sciences. So to conclude that believing the BB theory is rejecting God... doesn't work. Not for me. It is our destiny to ask questions and seek answers. That's what science... REAL science, does.
And I see both BB and evolution falling into that category. It is legitimate research. Not liking the answers is fine, but that's NOT science. The truth doesn't need any help to stand up.
Pinguinite posted on 2025-01-28 18:21:50 Reply Private Reply
#71: FormerLurker To: Pinguinite, Dakmar (#67)
E=mc2 they say.
Which means the amount of energy available (in Joules) of mass is equal to the constant of the speed of light squared times the amount of mass (in kilograms).
But WHAT exactly are they?
FormerLurker posted on 2025-01-28 18:24:42 Reply Private Reply
#72: Dakmar To: FormerLurker (#68)
BB explains why galaxies are hurtling away from us and spinning!
Dakmar posted on 2025-01-28 18:25:53 Reply Private Reply
#73: FormerLurker To: Dakmar (#72)
FormerLurker posted on 2025-01-28 18:29:28 Reply Private Reply
#74: Dakmar To: FormerLurker (#71)
Mass is matter
Energy is either velocity or electric charge
Until we get to the complex stuff. :)
Dakmar posted on 2025-01-28 18:29:29 Reply Private Reply
#75: Dakmar To: FormerLurker (#73)
Cargo planes, ca 1943
Dakmar posted on 2025-01-28 18:30:29 Reply Private Reply
#76: Dakmar To: watchman (#53)
Why would either need to be created if they have always existed?
Who or what created God?
Dakmar posted on 2025-01-28 18:34:22 Reply Private Reply
#77: FormerLurker To: Dakmar (#74)
We can break down matter to atoms and subatomic particles.
But what ARE they really?...
We know we can describe what energy does, but what IS it exactly?
BTW, charge isn't energy, it's potential energy.
Charge produces an electrostatic field. Energy can be seen as light, electromagnetic radiation, heat, and force that causes a mass to accelerate.
FormerLurker posted on 2025-01-28 18:35:23 Reply Private Reply
#78: FormerLurker To: Dakmar (#76)
That is the age old question.
FormerLurker posted on 2025-01-28 18:36:16 Reply Private Reply
#79: FormerLurker To: Dakmar (#75)
LOL!!
FormerLurker posted on 2025-01-28 18:36:50 Reply Private Reply
#80: watchman To: Dakmar (#76)
God self-exists...
You are ascribing God-like attributes to matter and space.
The pagans do that and worship such things.
I believe only God has "always existed"...and created both matter and space when He saw fit.
watchman posted on 2025-01-28 18:45:59 Reply Private Reply
#81: Dakmar To: FormerLurker (#77)
Where did those come from? Did some diety create them?
Dakmar posted on 2025-01-28 18:51:44 Reply Private Reply
#82: Dakmar To: watchman (#80)
So does the universe. The universe self attests to me every moment that it exists.
Dakmar posted on 2025-01-28 18:53:36 Reply Private Reply
#83: Dakmar To: watchman (#80)
I'll take that as a compliment, for now :)
Dakmar posted on 2025-01-28 18:55:38 Reply Private Reply
#84: FormerLurker To: Dakmar (#81)
Perhaps all that exists IS God.
FormerLurker posted on 2025-01-28 18:59:36 Reply Private Reply
#85: Pinguinite To: watchman (#61)
In that we are the same.
But I do see flaws in the Bible. I do think it's generally a good book, at least the New Testament. The OT, however, to me has flaws that give it away as a product of man. I further see many elements that are characteristic of being a work of an ancient people that bear many of the same qualities of people in our current age. A people that seek relevance. They write about being blessed by the divine when things are well, and when things are not well, it's because they displeased God. Because having the power to displease a supreme creator is also a way of expressing the importance of oneself. I see writings that are designed to frighten and control the population just as our current gov does today with things like covid.
Dr. Fauci would have been a High Priest back then, going into the temple and coming out telling everyone what God's will was. People would go and listen to what's on the 3000 BC version of the internet, but unlike today, they still believed everything they were told. Well, people today still do that, don't they?
Controlling the masses through fear was as useful then as it is today. Fear of God's wrath or of dropping dead from a virus. Obey God (us) and you will be blessed. Mass media keeping people from rioting and revolting. All useful stuff. Nothing new under the sun.
That is what I see. And today people ascribe divine authority behind ancient writings really only because they are ancient. True, the Israelites did a meticulous job of replicating their writings, unlike the Greeks which had altered versions of their god's endeavors just as Marvel comics does today with gods like the Hulk and Spiderman. And for the same reason. Entertaining the masses. But Israelites considered their writings to be divine which is the reason they took so much care in replicating their scrolls. But that doesn't mean they were divine. And as I said, I see flaws in them that to me betray it's authenticity as God's perfect message.
Pinguinite posted on 2025-01-28 18:59:53 Reply Private Reply
#86: FormerLurker To: watchman (#80)
What if God IS all that exists, has ever existed, and will ever exist?
How would you know if that wasn't true?
FormerLurker posted on 2025-01-28 19:01:16 Reply Private Reply
#87: Dakmar To: FormerLurker (#84)
Can I call my savior Olive?
That might upset a lot of people, so it starts tomorrow.
Dakmar posted on 2025-01-28 19:04:09 Reply Private Reply
#88: FormerLurker To: Pinguinite (#85)
Especially in passages that order the Jews to "smite" their enemies, men, women, children, and livestock.
Seems more of a order from men than an order from any sort of supreme being.
FormerLurker posted on 2025-01-28 19:05:03 Reply Private Reply
#89: Dakmar To: Pinguinite (#85)
Amen. DoublePlusGood on your humorous writing style.
Dakmar posted on 2025-01-28 19:08:37 Reply Private Reply
#90: watchman To: FormerLurker (#84)
That's called pan theology.
watchman posted on 2025-01-28 19:10:07 Reply Private Reply
#91: watchman To: FormerLurker (#86)
We exist, don't we?
And we are certainly not God.
watchman posted on 2025-01-28 19:13:53 Reply Private Reply
#92: Dakmar To: watchman (#90)
But if God created Everything, wouldn't Everything equal God?
Or are there Creator bonus points? :)
Dakmar posted on 2025-01-28 19:28:36 Reply Private Reply
#93: watchman To: Dakmar (#92)
No.
It means that God is the Creator, and "everything" else is His creation.
watchman posted on 2025-01-28 19:32:37 Reply Private Reply
#94: watchman To: Pinguinite (#85)
I see problem passages in the Bible, but not flaws/error.
watchman posted on 2025-01-28 19:34:26 Reply Private Reply
#95: Dakmar To: watchman (#93)
But how could God exist if nothing existed?
[edit] I know, God just exists... :)
Dakmar posted on 2025-01-28 19:34:37 Reply Private Reply
#96: watchman To: Dakmar (#95)
As I've mentioned God self-exists.
He is eternal...without beginning or end.
If this were not true He wouldn't be God.
watchman posted on 2025-01-28 19:37:08 Reply Private Reply
#97: watchman To: Dakmar (#95)
Now you're gettin' it!
You'll be a theologian in no time.
watchman posted on 2025-01-28 19:38:15 Reply Private Reply
#98: Dakmar To: watchman (#97)
Dakmar posted on 2025-01-28 19:39:17 Reply Private Reply
#99: Dakmar To: watchman (#96)
We reach!
Dakmar posted on 2025-01-28 19:44:14 Reply Private Reply
#100: watchman To: Dakmar (#98)
Omniscience: God's ability to know everything from beginning to end in one thought
Omnipresence: God's presence everywhere at all times, the totality of His being fills the universe
Merciful: God's quality of showing mercy
Loving: God's quality of love that is selfless, unconditional, and sacrificial
Sovereign: God's position of power and authority over all things things
Immutable: God's quality of being unchanging in his character, will, and promises
Self-sufficient: God's quality of possessing infinite riches of being, wisdom, goodness, and power, complete in every way
Holy: God's quality of being perfectly holy
Just: God's quality of being perfectly just
Good: God's quality of being perfectly good
Gracious: God's quality of being perfectly gracious
Faithful: God's quality of being perfectly faithful
Truthful: God's quality of being perfectly truthful
watchman posted on 2025-01-28 19:53:30 Reply Private Reply
#101: Esso To: Dakmar (#99)
Been a long ride, brutha.
Esso posted on 2025-01-28 20:31:04 Reply Private Reply
#102: ghostrider To: watchman (#28)
ghostrider posted on 2025-01-28 20:31:55 Reply Private Reply
#103: watchman To: ghostrider (#102)
watchman posted on 2025-01-28 21:36:17 Reply Private Reply
#104: Pinguinite To: Dakmar (#69)
My understanding is that basic stars are made of hydrogen which fuse into helium. After the hydrogen runs out, the helium then fuses into iron and once there's too much iron then it explodes in a supernova. In the explosion all the other elements are made instantly. All the material is blasted out into the surrounding space where it can form into rocks and such and planets.
Maybe there's something special about iron.
Pinguinite posted on 2025-01-28 21:57:20 Reply Private Reply
#105: Pinguinite To: Dakmar (#76)
We do not know. And it's okay not to know. What we do know is that we are here and that we were created in some way. So just because we don't understand the creation of all things including God doesn't mean God doesn't exist.
Pinguinite posted on 2025-01-28 22:03:06 Reply Private Reply
#106: watchman To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#13)
I only know his name.
I did hear that he is expecting a revival because of the election.
That did it for me.
As far as I'm concerned the churches are completely fallen away and spued out...as delusional as the world...believing every lie they hear. And that would include Ray Comfort.
Chances of revival are slim to none...
watchman posted on 2025-01-28 22:10:19 Reply Private Reply
#107: Pinguinite To: FormerLurker (#88)
That would be one of them yes. Christian theology really has to do some backbending to explain this, basically in saying that since God created all of us and owns all of us he can do anything with us as he pleases. Okay maybe but it's still cruel as hell and simply isn't consistent with the New testament.
Pinguinite posted on 2025-01-28 22:10:43 Reply Private Reply
#108: Dakmar To: Pinguinite (#104)
This stuff is way beyond my pay grade, but if black holes exist they have either always existed or more likely had an origin.
Dakmar posted on 2025-01-28 22:11:59 Reply Private Reply
#109: Pinguinite To: watchman (#94)
What's an example of a "problem passage"? Just so I understand the difference.
Pinguinite posted on 2025-01-28 22:16:12 Reply Private Reply
#110: watchman To: Pinguinite (#107)
Had Israel obeyed, the world would not be suffering under the Edomites as we are today.
Remember Noah's flood? God destroyed everything on the earth.
Remember Sodom and Gomorrah? God destroyed everyone in those cities.
And He will kill off His creation again as we head to Armageddon.
God is perfectly just.
watchman posted on 2025-01-28 22:24:24 Reply Private Reply
#111: Dakmar To: Pinguinite, FormerLurker (#104)
Dakmar posted on 2025-01-28 22:26:17 Reply Private Reply
#112: watchman To: Pinguinite (#109)
We don't shy away from them at all.
Will try to round up some examples after chores on the am
Edit: Perhaps you could provide an example of a flaw you found.
watchman posted on 2025-01-28 22:27:17 Reply Private Reply
#113: Pinguinite To: watchman (#110)
Sounds like it's a case of the ends justifying the means. That is a philosophical point that is soundly rejected under Christianity, is it not?
Pinguinite posted on 2025-01-28 22:36:00 Reply Private Reply